vincentML
Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
My preference would be to eliminate personal subsidies on the public nickel (i.e., food stamps and welfare payments), strengthen public goods (such as community gardens and free education at ALL levels, which would allow flexibility to those of us in the labor force without incentivizing long periods of unemployment) and open the boarders to let the market do its work. Markets tend to diffuse racial, national, and ethnic tensions because, the better and more EXPLICITLY they funciton, the more we all see we need one another (capital needs labor and vice versa), and the more we each see that every other is an opportunity to cooperate for mutual benefit, rather than a threat to our own economic security. I wonder if you are aware that the Welfare program underwent reform in 1996 and is now called Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and that most of the money goes to families with dependent children. Probably some nine million children or more. You would take food stamps away from families with kids? I wonder what your thinking is. I am also amused by your faith in free markets to diffuse "racial, national, and ethnic tensions." I am not sure how you can justify that statement in the face of a long history of exploitation of Labor by Capital. Need you be reminded of slavery, child labor, the great railroad strikes and lockouts of the 1877, the incidents at Haymarket Square in Chicago and the Triangle Shirt Factory fire in NYC. And you offer what... community gardens? Really?
_____________________________
vML Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.
|