Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:27:51 PM   
Elisabella


Posts: 3939
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

That does make sense, but I guess they're using him as an example and I really can't be too upset over him going to jail...yeah I think 60 years is pretty crazy but a year or two not so much, if it is true that he was told that his workers SSN's were bad and didn't do anything about it.


Ain't you just the little blond haired blue eyed bigot.
You have no problem chucking an illegal alien back across the boarder and making him wait ten years to get in a 25 year long waiting line to apply for legal entry but you think a slaver should not be punished more severly.
You are a real piece of work girl.



K thx bai.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:29:36 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

quote:

That does make sense, but I guess they're using him as an example and I really can't be too upset over him going to jail...yeah I think 60 years is pretty crazy but a year or two not so much, if it is true that he was told that his workers SSN's were bad and didn't do anything about it.


Ain't you just the little blond haired blue eyed bigot.
You have no problem chucking an illegal alien back across the boarder and making him wait ten years to get in a 25 year long waiting line to apply for legal entry but you think a slaver should not be punished more severly.
You are a real piece of work girl.



K thx bai.


Dont listen to him.   He is on medication.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:33:49 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx


quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Personally I think taking everything he owns is better than sending him to jail...jail is a whole other expense and he probably wont even get jail time...keep jails for the people who are a danger physcially/mentally to the public.
keep an eye on his wealth and income for a few years... White collar assholes get off easy
fuck him in the pocket,




OMFG not you too ...you are breaking my heart baby.
This piece of shit is a slaver I say fuck him in the wallet and let bubba noneck fuck him in the ass.
Sixty years in the joint is not near enough.

Im thinking of the cost honey, and space...

Early release for a couple of street level marijuana dealers and there will be an empty bunk for him.
while jail is a trip for white collars, the fact that more get away with it is what gets me pissed. you know damned well he aint gonna get banged up with bubba redneck, but with people like others like him in the country club jails
tookind

Here in california prisons are big business. Since he is not a violent felon he would go first to a minimum security facility...he does not appear to be wealthy enough to go to club fed like crough and the rest of nixon's plumbers.
dont get me started cos I AM being politically correct,

Please stop it does not fit your personality.

what Id really like to do with people like him is against TOS

When you get moderated you can sit next to me and arlo on the group "w" bench.
We will have a fine ol time.





(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:43:18 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


quote:

ORIGINAL: thompsonx

You want to go easy on this fellow who has commited a felony but you never seemed to feel it was ok to go easy on the illegal alien who had only commited a misdemeanor....kinda points to your agenda...ya phoquing bigot.

What part of that was unclear?




The part where I said I want to "go easy" on him. I think the law itself is stupid.

But anyway if you're just going to call names on this for what you perceive my motivations to be let me know so I can pop you on ignore for a week or so because this shit is tiring.



Well of course you think the law is stupid it is a white guy going to prison.
You can put me on iggy from now till hell freezes do you think that will change your phoquing bigot status?
I have my opinions about some of the laws in oz but I don't live there so it is really none of my business.
I do live here and this is my business.
Please stay there and don't come back to my country cuz bigots like you are enablers for shit piles like this baker.
I would love to see his ass deported when he gets out of prison...and if he dies in prison I hope they ship his fucking scumbag carcass back to where he came from.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:45:30 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Dont listen to him. He is on medication.


Et tu hunky?...

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:45:39 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
thompson,

My opinions posted are specific to this particular case. I am thinking objectively in terms the local economy, in this case, the San Diego area.

There is a big difference between this type of illegal activity and violent crime. I am not going to derail this whole discussion; start another if you want.

The cost of housing an inmate in California is more than $20,000 per year.
http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?xid=yl82yoctf9d1au

If the restaurant owner, Michel Malecot, is incarcerated then the taxpayers pay for it. I would rather he pays fines to ICE and keeps operating his business in accordance with the law.

I have no idea what you mean by "pc bigot". As for your other assumptions I have stated here in many conversations that my family is multi-ethnic and multi-lingual. We are a rainbow tribe.

And as mentioned previously, I have worked in the retail, restaurant and hotel occupations in California and seen how the system operates first hand. Most US born persons do not apply for the really low level dirty jobs that pay minimum wage or less. Typically your front of house staff at a restaurant or hotel is US born and the janitors, maids, laundry, etc are immigrants. And this is true for small businesses through the big mega-chains.

In some cases the conditions would be considered slave labor. In others the workers are treated the same as regular employees. There are differences between different companies and owners.

Please stop with the personal attacks thompson.

Vendaval







_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:49:14 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
quote:

But anyway if you're just going to call names on this for what you perceive my motivations to be let me know so I can pop you on ignore for a week or so because this shit is tiring.



If you are not proud of being a bigot then perhaps you should stop.

(in reply to Elisabella)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 4:53:40 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Thomson, you are out of line.

Try being a gentleman.   Take a break.   Later re-read how hostile you are.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:02:18 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
I think that elisabella has shown her true colors more than once on these types of threads.

If you want to get rid of illegals get rid of their employment opportunities. It's fairly simple shit.

I have no problem with the confiscation of property that is used in a crime. In Wisconsin if you are a poacher your car is up for grabs. Sucks to be you.

The Illegals are not the problem. They are doing what they do.

_____________________________



(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:07:07 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
re-read the thread.

there is no reason to be name calling.   who ever -  we are supposed to be the example.... and right now preschoolers would be better behaved.

we are adults....  -  or so I thought.

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:09:55 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
It's about getting results....You can attack the evil hispanics or their felonious overlords.

It seems that going after the Johns or Juans just does not make any sense whatsoever.

_____________________________



(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:22:51 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

thompson,

My opinions posted are specific to this particular case. I am thinking objectively in terms the local economy, in this case, the San Diego area.

There is a big difference between this type of illegal activity and violent crime. I am not going to derail this whole discussion; start another if you want.

I am on topic. We are discussing the scumbag who employs illegal aliens. The overwhelming majority of illegals are paid less than minimum wage and the employer is obligated to withhold the taxes and remit them to the federal government.
Employing illegal aliens and not remiting the taxes due on their wages are both federal crimes. Not prosecuting this asshole and all like him sends a clear message that slavery is OK and thieving from the government is OK.


The cost of housing an inmate in California is more than $20,000 per year.
http://www.capitolweekly.net/article.php?xid=yl82yoctf9d1au

This link is for state prison. This is a federal crime and he would go to a federal prison which is more expensive by about 40%.
I hope this piece of shit spend the rest of his life in prison.


If the restaurant owner, Michel Malecot, is incarcerated then the taxpayers pay for it. I would rather he pays fines to ICE and keeps operating his business in accordance with the law.

Why! Why should a white man who commits dozens of federal felonies not be put in prison...bernie madoff is in prison why not this asswipe?
Is it because bernie fucked white people out of money? This piece of human garbage only fucked mexicans out of money so he should get a pass...yeah right.



I have no idea what you mean by "pc bigot".

Politically correct bigot= someone who favors preferential treatment for some criminals based on financial,social or ethnic considerations.
This is what you are calling for. Do you have a problem with the illegal alien being punished to the letter of the law? $5,000 fine,deportation and a ten year wait till they can go to the back of the 25 year long line to apply for legal entry?



As for your other assumptions I have stated here in many conversations that my family is multi-ethnic and multi-lingual. We are a rainbow tribe.

Somehow in your mind that precludes you from being a bigot...how so?

And as mentioned previously, I have worked in the retail, restaurant and hotel occupations in California and seen how the system operates first hand.

Do you presume that you are the only one with that experience?


Most US born persons do not apply for the really low level dirty jobs that pay minimum wage or less.

Girl I have lived in california since 1954.
I am white blond haired and blue eyes and I have picked beans, tomatoes,strawberries and oranges. I have washed dishes and bussed tables.
My mother cleaned other peoples homes, and washed dishes so your characterization of "most americans" does not hold water with me.


Typically your front of house staff at a restaurant or hotel is US born and the janitors, maids, laundry, etc are immigrants. And this is true for small businesses through the big mega-chains.

In some cases the conditions would be considered slave labor. In others the workers are treated the same as regular employees. There are differences between different companies and owners.

If you are paid less than minimum wage,
if you can be threatened with deportation for speaking up,
if your employer does not remit your taxes and contributions to unemployment and workmans comp you are a slave.




Please stop with the personal attacks thompson.

If you are not completely comfortable with being a bigot perhaps you should stop.
If your are not completely comfortable with my observations you are well aware of where the block button is.




Vendaval








(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 112
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:33:35 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
thompson,

You are being really hostile and rude in your responses. That says far more about you than the persons you are targeting.


_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 113
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:33:48 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Thomson, you are out of line.

Do you really think that calling a fucking bigot a fucking bigot is out of line?

Try being a gentleman.   Take a break.   Later re-read how hostile you are.

Officers are gentlemen...I was enlisted so there is no hope for me in that arena.
I do not need to reread how hostile I am...I fucking know how hostile I am.
I have lived with the illegal alien problem in the southwest for the past fifty motherfucking years and this is the first time I have seen an employer arrested.
I hope he is the first of tens of thousands of those blood sucking leaches to go to prison and have all of their assetts both corporate and personal confiscated.





(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 114
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:36:14 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

thompson,

You are being really hostile and rude in your responses. That says far more about you than the persons you are targeting.



Well that would be your opinion...
I am sure you are aware of mine.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 115
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:38:26 PM   
VideoAdminZeta


Posts: 1103
Joined: 7/26/2008
From: the darkest recesses of your twisted minds
Status: offline
Well, my opinion is that it's time to chill out.

(in reply to thompsonx)
Profile   Post #: 116
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:43:10 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline
Why I am just getting warmed up.
I have zero tolerance for bigots or those who defend bigots.
If you hire illegal aliens you are ipso facto a bigot.
I have said nothing that is untrue.

(in reply to VideoAdminZeta)
Profile   Post #: 117
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:45:39 PM   
domiguy


Posts: 12952
Joined: 5/2/2006
Status: offline
Nothing quite says, Chill, like knocking back a few....Perhaps I can have my man servant, Estaban, mix up a round of margaritas.

Will they take my Domicile?

< Message edited by domiguy -- 5/27/2010 5:46:19 PM >


_____________________________



(in reply to VideoAdminZeta)
Profile   Post #: 118
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:48:37 PM   
thompsonx


Posts: 23322
Joined: 10/1/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: domiguy

Nothing quite says, Chill, like knocking back a few....Perhaps I can have my man servant, Estaban, mix up a round of margaritas.

Will they take my Domicile?



How bout dem cubbies?

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 119
RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers - 5/27/2010 5:48:49 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Yeah- lets have Pedro make you a Margarita.


STOMP

(in reply to domiguy)
Profile   Post #: 120
Page:   <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Immigration debate, legal charges against employers Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094