Mercnbeth -> RE: Slavery is bullshit (6/3/2010 4:19:19 AM)
|
~ FAST CIAO! ~ quote:
Slavery is bullshit It sure is! So, as are used in these forums, the terms Master, Dominant and submissive for that matter. The only appropriate term in common practice which describes all people is 'switch'. EVERYONE submits to someone, or something, every day. For instance, people submit to traffic laws, unless of course you are Neapolitan driving in Italy where 'red' is only a "suggestion" to slow down or perhaps stop if the mood strikes you. Few are Seinfeld daily "Masters of their domain". A Master telling a slave to jump and stay in the air submits to gravety, or the limitations of space travel access. So why use the term? Honestly I hate it and always have; finding it repulsive to glorify a term which best represts the worst in human nature - the nonconsentual enslaving of other humans. If kajari rolled off my tongue easier, perhaps I'd use it; but then I'd have to be accepting of an 'off-world' concept where the implied implications which would be similiarly personally non-attactive. I 'settled' on the term slave appreciating that it required the recriprical term 'Master'; applying and wearing them with no comfort and standing behind no confident argument for their use. Best explained; we use the terms as a short cut on-line, or IRL, introduction among fellow 'life-stylers'. (Another obtuse term.) The labels are akin to a 'Hello - my name is....' badge at a convention. As soon as we can - we rip off the damn things off and say, "hello, I'm Merc - this is beth" - and that's it. You really want to know that those labels mean - we're happy to share our 'contract'; but that gets into a whole different discussion - doesn't it? What we do to/with each other and those who we deem trustworthy enough to enjoin us, or our company, isn't defined by any label. Yet - one seems to be needed isn't it? We've found in our experience labels are needed, and held onto more by those less secure in their representation. Before that generates a point proving rebuttal, consider the key phase - "in our experience" - you experience may, and should, vary. What comes first - the label or the need and desire? Everyone starts with a fantasy right? With apprehension you try to fulfill it. That takes a partner. To find one ASAP you need a shortcut. A lengthy detailed resume is socially awkward - check any profile page as supporting evidence. Words suck to convey desire. 'Spanking' ranges from a swat as you pass by, to a session with Kane of 'LA LAIR de SADE' - you better substantiate the meaning before thinking you have a word agreement. Labels provide a shortcut to wants and needs and experimentation. Once meeting a potential partner they begin to have meaning. Wants/Needs seem to be a rationalized means to and end. Michael's hot button is "inspired" slavery, or at least submission since he's applied the BS label to that term. To me "inspiration" is too difficult a job. I don't know if I'm a 'Master' or not - but I do know coming home from a job - I don't want to have to, or need to, "inspire" anyone to do anything. I want a someone to submit to me. beth is that someone. If she considers herself "inspired" - good for her; I didn't require it. Quite the contrary, I expect and want her to submit 24/7 whether I'm inspiring or not - and trust me on occasions I am not. From my view there is no difference between inspiring someone and submitting to someone. To 'inspire' you must assume a submission role in the image of the person/persons being inspired to achieve a desired result. Well hell - that's sounds too much like work, needing to be 'on' 24/7 to inspire the dynamic. Then again - "These are only words - you MUST go through the experiences." I have mine - Michael has his. Differences and distinctions make good and interesting discussions. I have no need to inspire Michael to agree with any of my position on any matter to deem him a friend. I respect and find it refreshing whenever I encounter an individual who has enough confidence to not list head bobbing agreement as a condition of friendship. Few appreciate that beth and I agree on little politically and on social issues. 'Winning' that ongoing debate isn't a requirement for us being together. The fact that we respect each other's position and can debate intelligently is; although it is frustrating that she doesn't see she is obviously wrong! What beth and I share is a relationship. As we tell everyone who asks; we are both 'slaves' to that relationship fulfilling complimentary responsibilities. There is no 'role' either of us play. Even on those rare occasions when wearing clothing in the other's company we are alway 'naked' to each other. We say that neither of us inspire the other; yet - on some level maybe that is a rationalization. Maybe at first sight we inspired each other so much we didn't notice it and simply fell into our ongoing inspirational 'roles'. That's the kind of thing we leave to Michael, and others who know us, and even those who don't, to decide. It's fun and interesting but the bottom line is - good or bad - outside opinions are irrelevant to us. What are we; Master/slave - Dominant/submissive - the 'WE' is the most important. We're just a couple of average folk enjoying the hell out of, and having more FUN, in our life than we believed possible before we met. Call us anything but be sure and call us for the party! Speaking of parties - REALLY Michael, you generated a (thus far) 23 page semantic debate?! Congratulations - you are well on your way to being a 'true' sadist! Getting 'some' regularly really does agree with you! See you on the 26th - and YES - the party will be up to the usual standard I'm sure. Reading some of the posts here; I think the PVE police will need SWAT support from LA. Remember - As per local ordinance - No outside "orgy sounds" after 10PM. Today we're off to check out the ruins of Pompeii. I'll check and let you know if there are any ancient CM type graffiti with "one true way - 'slave'" discussions among the ruins. CIAO! Speaking of parties - Italy is a PARTY country! DAMN! Food doesn't suck either!
|
|
|
|