Ishtarr -> RE: Slavery is bullshit (6/1/2010 4:00:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: SocratesNot But I will ask you 2 absolutely unreasonable questions, so that we can in theory explain the nature of your obedience, is it really automatic, or you actually choose to obey. So , would you kill an innocent person if he ordered you to, in a situation when you have absolutely no clue why he orders it? Would you kill yourself, if he ordered it? First of all, no I don't assume he is perfect. My responds to jump when he would tell me to is not any different then the response from a well-trained soldier in combat to a command of his long-know, well-trusted officer. Put that same soldier with a newbie officer that he has no history with, and he will most likely be very hesitant to obey certain commands. But if he and the officer have a history together, soldiers WILL take orders that at first hand seem to be insane. That doesn't mean that they think their officer is incapable of making mistakes, it just means that the officer has proven that he is unlikely to make a mistake, and that the soldier has learned over time that the likelihood of him getting out alive is substantially greater when following the officer's command then when questioning and debating it with him. My obedience to my Master was based on the history we had together, and his ability to project and maintain an aura in which I had absolute faith in him. So as to your last two questions: If and only if that bond of faith in my Master is still in place (and thus excluding scenarios in which he's obviously gone insane or something like that) then yes, I would have killed for him, and yes, I would have died for him. The reason this is because the only way you can possible come up with a scenario in which he would order such a thing and still have that bond of faith in place, he would have a very good and legitimate reason for ordering me to do so. If I still had faith in him, then he would still be that same man "obsessed with doing the right thing" which means that "killing or dying" would be the right thing to do. Not likely that there are many, or even ANY scenarios that you can come up with in which he'd be convinced that "killing or dying" was the right thing. But IF there are, and IF he would have been convinced that it was the right thing, then yeah, I'd see no reason to have not obeyed him.
|
|
|
|