Elisabella
Posts: 3939
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: eyesopened ~FR~ I agree with Thompsonx that people do not choose to abuse drugs based on whether or not that substance is legal. I suppose it would be one thing if addiction only effected the addict. Addiction touches others in more ways than just crimes committed to obtain the money. While I don't agree that being an addict should be treated as a crime I can't help but to think of the pregnant addict, the child addict, the effect addiction has to the quality of life for all the people who love the addicted person. Heroin is but one substance. I suppose giving heroin to the addict is one way to keep them from committing crimes but what about giving meth to meth addicts? At least heroin is a depressant and the addicts tend to be passive when high but what about the methamphetimine addict who is not such a calm, submissive sort? One of the reasons why substances were made illegal initially was because of the effect the addiction had on families. I cannot bear the thought of one more baby being born in misery because it is addicted to meth or crack or heroin. I cannot bear the thought of one more baby given coacine in it's formula so it will stop crying and need less to eat. I cannot bear the thought of one more child being left in a hot car to have its brains cooked because a nodded out heroin addict "forgot" the child was still strapped in the car seat. How will giving out free drugs stop these things from happening? Short answer - it won't stop these things from happening any more than prohibition has stopped these things from happening. I don't think there will ever be a time when there aren't irresponsible parents or violent people. That's part of the tragedy of life. And I think that irresponsible parents and violent people should be punished to the full extent of the law. I've never used methamphetamine or known anyone who has, so I can't really comment on it. Personally I think it's a dirty drug and wouldn't touch it, but it exists, and it's not going away. There are people who get violent when drunk, people who drive when drunk and kill families, people who use alcohol as a way to facilitate rape - and last century, people decided that the reason these things were happening is because of the alcohol, not because of the person. So they banned it. And people started dying from bathtub liquor, mafia corruption seeped into police and government, and strangely enough people kept drinking alcohol and doing stupid things when under the influence of it. As it is now, drug education is based in abstinence only policy and consists of "This is bad. Don't do it." There's no emphasis on responsible use, so drug users sort of learn as they go along what works, they get their information from other drug users rather than learning the facts, and they slip into very bad habits, as well as a sense of desperation. There's a canyon of disconnect between normal society and drug users, because of the criminal element, and the fact that by default all of a user's friends are users means they've become part of a dangerous subculture and think less of doing stupid things. IMO drug prohibition has done more to hurt society than to help it. I doubt I'll be able to convince you of that, but at the very least, the tip of the iceberg is that the war on drugs has been going on for decades and the results are skyrocketing incarceration rates, neighborhoods more or less owned by violent gangs, the creation of many designer drugs that are more dangerous than the organic stuff originally banned, and the drugs themselves are more dangerous due to inconsistent purity and dangerous adulterants. Do you honestly think if we give the war on drugs enough time it will actually eradicate drug use? Maybe 20 years from now? We'll both still be alive, presumably. If the war on drugs has won in 2030, if there aren't any more addicts, or drug dealers, or drug related gang violence, I will apologize and eat my words. If it hasn't, I'll give it til 2040. Then 2050. Then 2060 but I'll probably be dead by then so it won't really matter, but if you're still alive in 2060 you can stop by my grave and write "I told you so" on it with a marker.
|