LanceHughes
Posts: 4737
Joined: 2/12/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: juliaoceania quote:
The topic is of GREAT concern to BDSMers that live in the USA. Yes, other parts of the world live under less stringent laws. The "passing" (as in dying) of DSM-IV(TR) should be celebrated in the USA BDSM and Leather communities. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough, I challenge the whole psychological paradigm that this DSM-IV is based upon, and we should challenge it, because if something isn't relevant from a cross cultural perspective, it isn't valid as a hard science to label happy functioning people who harm no one else as "deviant" Thanks for the explanation. It has taken many, many years to rise to the challenge presented by DSM-IV (TR). The "whole psychological paradigm" is a product of many, many individuals and many conflicting views. You, as an anthropologist, I am sure, are well aware of the so-called cultural war taking place in the US even as we type. The DSM battle in that "culture war" appears to be won and won by the forces representing your view. When "hard science" came into play, it was in a minor role and mostly that of gathering statistical evidence to use as ammunition against those that held (and continue to hold) views opposite to your own. Again, there is no debate as you mean it. A lot more politics (and attendent posturing) than anything else. Would that writing the DSM (any version) did rest on "hard science." Because gays would have been treated very differently for a long time. Many gays driven to suicide would be alive today. Many families would not have been torn asunder. And so on. I totally agree with the fact that all DSM versions (including the upcoming DSM-V) have been the provinence of voting..... BLEAH. As a mathematician and computer scientist, I'm disgusted at that prospect. It's like voting on the value of pi - or using the Biblical value (of exactly 3) because gawd says so. I now understand the importance of taking cross-cultral behaviors into effect. Thanks for explaining that to me so clearly. I agree... that "should" have influenced the first DSM, but it didn't and we can only be thankful (to the various psychologists and psychiatrists and, I'll wager, an anthropologist or two) that they were able to remove the paraphilias given the powerful forces that wanted to retain them. quote:
I'm not sure where your particular "world view" comes from. quote:
I'm a trained anthropologist... I apologize for getting snarky. If I had had the follow-on, more detailed, more lucid explanation, I would never have written that and certainly not in that tone of voice. Thanks again! Regards, Lance Hughes. <edited to 'fix' quoting>
< Message edited by LanceHughes -- 6/12/2010 3:34:21 PM >
_____________________________
"Train 'em the right way - my way." Lance Hughes "Advice is what we ask for when we already know the answer, but wish we didn't." Erica Jong 10 fluffy points 50 nz points Member: VAA's posse
|