RE: Public or Private Displays.

RE: Public or Private Displays. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

leadership527 -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/18/2010 9:49:14 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I just know I'm going to get mod slapped for this. I'm pretty sure if Jeffff wanted his profile put up on this thread, he'd have done it himself. It was mine actually, and I'm fine with people posting it or excerpts from it. Honestly, I don't post things on the internet that I don't want the whole world to see. I'm certainly not going to debate the point quoted though. I think Ranja has made her position abundantly clear.

LadyPact -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/18/2010 10:20:17 AM)
My mistake for the additional ffffff's. I'm also glad to hear that you're cool with it. [:)]

Jeffff -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/18/2010 10:48:05 AM)
Both you, and the Univeristy of Sydney are welcome to my profile anytime sweetie!

ranja -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/19/2010 2:54:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff quote: ORIGINAL: ranja i am un aware. Quoted for truth. hahaha Jeffff... it seems we are in good company...

Jeffff -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/19/2010 3:18:35 AM)
Nice edit, even I can spell truth.

laurell3 -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/19/2010 3:18:51 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: ranja Jeff, this is from your profile: "For us, there is a relatively small kink component to this. We don't engage in SM and about the extent of the bondage is the collar, leash, and occasionally I cuff her while she's working just because I like seeing her submit physically" again i like to point out that i do not have any problem with anybody doing their thing, but at the same time i fail to see how a kinky thing like having your partner on a leash (as you refer to it yourself in such a way) is not sexual... And wether it makes anybody horny or not is not the point... i would argue that flirting is sexually driven aswell, but that does not mean to say that anybody who does a bit of flirting is horny And if people can not understand why i think it is sexual, then i think that they are missing the point and some lovely intimate sexy power play is totally not picked up upon and wasted... and all there is left is a sad and silly display of two adults, who should know better, playing dogs upsetting some members of the general public... but hey, if that is your thing go ahead. Also someone mentioned there is a difference between a lead and a leash... can anybody explain what the difference is as i am un aware. Does anyone see the complete irony in ranja being the spelling/grammar dictator on this thread? Your assertation that you aren't trying to insult anyone is quite obviously untrue. If I were going to be the spelling nazi, I'd probably mind my own first. The reason people are saying it isn't sexual is because it clearly isn't to them. The fact that it is to you doesn't change that. You can bitch and moan about it all day, they aren't you and your childish arguments don't change the fact that we are all different.

ranja -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/19/2010 3:23:32 AM)
Thank you for pointing that out Jef with four fs

Tpower38 -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/25/2010 8:38:56 AM)
For me it depends on the type of public play. I had my new sub out to dinner Wednesday night and she had a wireless remote control egg in her pussy and I had the remote. Every once in awhile throughout the evening, I would turn on the egg when she was least expecting it and give her a little bit of a jolt. She really enjoyed it as did I seeing her reaction and seeing her trying to hide her reactions from the rest of the patrons in the restaurant. Noone was the wiser or at least if they were they didn't say anything. It was fun. As long as noone gets offended or upset then there is nothing wrong with certain types of public play. She even wears what I want and how I want ehr to wear it which is no panties or bra and blouse open to between her tits so she is showing a fair amount of cleavage and if she moves a certain way she will show her tits to anyone who looks. Nothing wrong with that either, again, as long as noone gets offended or upset.

IronBear -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/25/2010 3:43:09 PM)
Not that many years ago I was at a, ethnic restaurant with a couple of friends and a girl. My friends knew that the girl was a slave and were amused mildly at her referring to me as Master and her discomfort at sitting next to me and being treated as an equal by the restaurant staff. No big deal there, but what had my friends and the girl's eyes boggling and interest piqued was a gentle,an sitting alone but many patrons would come up to greet him with deference and bow to kiss the ring on the left hand. It reminded me of people including servants doing this to my late Maternal Grandmother too... For me it demonstrated that it is not just some quirks of Kink folk which get tongues wagging, but protocols from other cultures or public displays of old fashion manners which to some in the modern crude, rude day and age, are offensive to the extreme where as some things like leashing a girl in public raises no eyebrows..

slavekal -> RE: Public or Private Displays. (6/25/2010 8:43:39 PM)
All depends. When I transport my Mistress in her rickshaw at public venues, it is pretty easy to decuce that I am her slave. And people LOVE it! Some of the women just go nuts. We are not doing anything sexual per se, but the femdom dynamic is obvious.

Page: << < prev 8 9 10 11 [12]

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.03125