lally2
Posts: 2621
Joined: 4/16/2009 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Andalusite Icarys, in my last two relationships (3 years as a submissive, 1 year as a slave), I was able to let go and trust and do activities that scared me, that I didn't like or want to do, or that I had previously had difficulty with, fairly early on. There wasn't any struggle against him, only sometimes against myself. Occasionally I needed baby steps, say two or three tries over time before I was able to get where he wanted me to go. To some extent, I did have to be vulnerable and willing to surrender up-front, but it very much was inspired by my interaction with them as specific people. I wasn't actively seeking someone to surrender to, though, I was open to a lot of different possibilities, depending on the interaction with the specific person. I'm one of those "dirty switches" according to your post on page 1, though. this was an early glitch for me - and maybe this is what icarys is talking about a little, but it took me a while to realise that it wasnt so much what the Dominant did to get me to open up and let go it was more to do with me allowing myself to let go. i think there is a priod when a sub will think that it is largely the job of the Dominant to engender this letting go and to some extent it is, but it also has to come from within the sub. i think its actually that realisation that finally helps it all to click into place. no one can make you surrender completely, no one can make you let go unless youre ready and feel secure enough in youreself. the right soil conditions are imperative however - the sub has to trust that her trust is well placed and that she wont be let to fall on her face the moment that she uncoils from her safe little lair and ventures closer in
_____________________________
So all I have to do in order to serve him, is to work out exactly how improbable he is, feed that figure into the finite improbability generator, give him a fresh cup of really hot tea ... and turn him on!
|