Proprietrix
Posts: 756
Joined: 7/15/2005 From: Ohio/West Virginia Status: offline
|
The more the merrier? More hands make less work? I think it's all in the types of relationships. I don't personally have "loving romantic" types of relationships with my subs. They aren't my boyfriends. They are my submissives. Do I love them? Yes! But not in a romantic, monogamous, coupling style. Some lifestyle relationships simply aren't based around the coupling aspect. There can come a great sense of belonging and satisfaction in being part of a group larger than oneself and one's partner. Lifestyle "houses" or tribal-style groupings or small communities can provide an individual with a strong sense of belonging and a clearly defined role. quote:
I for one could never be a sub to a Domme that can't devote all of her attention to me as her one and only sub. I can't even fathom the idea of the woman I love, adore, admire, respect, and cherish, having other subs at the same time. If knowing that these other people brought her extreme happiness in her life, why would you want to deny her those people? Do you feel the same way about strong bonds she may have with her family, co-workers, and friends? Or just other submissives? I'm not being fecicious here, but could it be that you are putting more weight on your own insecurities than on your Dominant's happiness? quote:
Would those same Dommes allow one of her subs to serve another Mistress? For me, in most cases, no. It would develop a conflict of interest. Currently, my boy and I are negotiating his love life. I am much older than him. I have had my offspring and won't have any more. He is younger, has a family who places a demand on him to marry someday, wants a baby of his own, and still desires the opportunity to experience life as a young adult. Although him finding a Mistress to suit those needs is an option, it's not one either of us are happy with. Instead, we will probably find a compatible female submissive more his age, and she will become my sub as well as his wife. I will not love him any less if I collar her. Since power exchange relationships are not lateral to begin with, nor based on equality, it makes little sense to try to reverse the order of hierarchy by turning the tables to "play fair". Some examples (and a few aren't "lifestyle" but still represent the same concept): A Goddess having more than one worshipper doesn't justify worshipping more than one God. A Queen having millions in her kingdom would consider it treason if her countrymen hailed a different Queen. The Pope has many people in his Papacy, but they only focus on one Pope. A Mobster having more than one henchman. But being a croonie to two different mobsters is likely to get your ass shot. A President can have an entire country of followers, but a country with more than one President is very rare. And on and on. The basic principal is that these are asymmetrical relationships. The one in power acquires enthusiasts. quote:
Are we talking about play only here? My relationships have very little play, and even less sexuality in them. quote:
Are these Domme/ multi sub relationships really loving relationships? It depends on how one defines a loving relationship. I have a loving relationship with my son. Probably not the type you're talking about, but a hell of a strong bond, with amonumental amount of love. (On a side note, I could also have a loving relationship with more than one offspring, but in most cases, I wouldn't want them to have more than one mother.) quote:
So how do you deal with having more then one sub? Do you Dommes feel love for each of them equally? Or is the word "love" used loosely or have a different meaning then it does to me? I'd definitely say it's in defining the word "love". My love is an infinite resource. I can love more than one person. Loving a second (or 3rd, 4th...) doesn't mean I love the first any less. I like to eat fish. But if I have chicken for dinner, it doesn't mean I'm somehow turning my back on fish. I can love more than one child. I can love more than one sibling. I can love more than one friend. I can love more than one pet. I can love more than one submissive. Poly is a very foriegn concept to many Western civilizations that socially practice and teach coupling. I was brought up more tribally oriented and went on to study culture as an adult. So the concepts of many people, larger households, communes, more than one spouse, harems, and clans are completely natural and make sense to me. What doesn't make sense to me is placing the expectation on a single individual to meet my every need. To me, that seems overwhelming and unfair to the person.
|