RE: No Male dominatrices?

RE: No Male dominatrices? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion

Message

laurell3 -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:29:39 AM)
You honestly think most women don't know that?

tazzygirl -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:29:51 AM)
We arent aware? Are you blind???

IronBear -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:35:37 AM)
SocNot, Lad, Lad, Lad, when you go out dating properly with real people and not blow-ups or sheep or goats, but real live flash and blood (gawd what flesh there is too ripe for the handling) breathing, sexually active female of the human species, you will find out just how much they are all aware of the power they have between their delectable thighs.

BitaTruble -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:36:55 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl As far as statistics, that little belle curve can be exploited. Statistics can be skewed quite easily to reveal the results the researcher is looking for. QFT Something else that I haven't seen brought up yet is that there will be many women who simply won't admit, even anonymously, how high their libido really is due to the stigmata that has surrounded women and their sex drives for so long. Good girls don't enjoy sex. Submit to sex with your husband even though it is wrong and dirty. How many hundreds of years has that been pounded into the heads of our children? Image can skew things quite drastically but to believe that because it is not something women will admit to having doesn't mean it isn't there. I mean, men are having sex with someone and, unless they are gay, it's usually going to be with a woman. It's like don't ask, don't tell and in many cases it's .. even if you ask, I'm not telling. Once again this boils down to trying to put humans into tiny, neat little boxes, mark it down on a clip board, call it science and think it's truth.

BitaTruble -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:39:25 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SocratesNot Sad but true, women are not even aware of how great advantage they have. [sm=yeahright.gif]

tazzygirl -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:40:04 AM)
I once had a man i was dating tell me i needed three men just to keep me satisfied. I toyed with that idea. Played with that idea. Enjoyed that idea. [:D] so did the three guys.

laurell3 -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:42:45 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BitaTruble quote: ORIGINAL: SocratesNot Sad but true, women are not even aware of how great advantage they have. [sm=yeahright.gif] Celeste, when it comes to having accessability to sex (well in the vanilla world) in general, sure we have an advantage. Arguably men create their disadvantage on their own though.

LadyCimarron -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:49:38 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BitaTruble QFT Something else that I haven't seen brought up yet is that there will be many women who simply won't admit, even anonymously, how high their libido really is due to the stigmata that has surrounded women and their sex drives for so long. Good girls don't enjoy sex. Submit to sex with your husband even though it is wrong and dirty. How many hundreds of years has that been pounded into the heads of our children? Image can skew things quite drastically but to believe that because it is not something women will admit to having doesn't mean it isn't there. I mean, men are having sex with someone and, unless they are gay, it's usually going to be with a woman. It's like don't ask, don't tell and in many cases it's .. even if you ask, I'm not telling. Once again this boils down to trying to put humans into tiny, neat little boxes, mark it down on a clip board, call it science and think it's truth. This is a valid point. Many women can attest that when we are younger some of us tend say we are having less sex than we actually are. There are many men, on the other hand, who tend to claim that they are having more sex than they actually are. (locker room talk).

BitaTruble -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:50:00 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 Celeste, when it comes to having accessability to sex (well in the vanilla world) in general, sure we have an advantage. Arguably men create their disadvantage on their own though. You do know that's a sarcastic smiley, right? [8D] I think most women are extremely aware of the great advantage they have but some of us dispense with that advantage and choose to go the power exchange route and allow someone else to control what goes on in the nether regions. Depending on who's doing the pulling.. yank my hair and you may get a knee in the balls.. or, you may get an instant puddle then it's time for [sm=sex.gif] followed by [sm=mop.gif] [:D]

tazzygirl -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:51:53 AM)
Can we reverse that last part? The last thing i wanna do after sex is clean, unless its cleaning us both up before falling into an exhausted sleep.

laurell3 -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:54:41 AM)
Well at my house there's always laundry to do after sex....just sayin.... I gotcha Celeste, thanks!

BitaTruble -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 9:59:53 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 Well at my house there's always laundry to do after sex....just sayin.... Here, too! I clean up afterwards because He who holds the Power makes me sleep in the wet spot if I don't change the sheets which is fair since I'm usually the one who's made the mess even if it was at his behest. Then there's that whole lack of bladder control due to age and endo going on.. it really doesn't help. [:D]

Jeffff -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:02:02 AM)
If you two are so concerned about cleaning up, go take a look at the "shit and urine" thread. Puts a whole new spin on things.

tazzygirl -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:07:40 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BitaTruble quote: ORIGINAL: laurell3 Well at my house there's always laundry to do after sex....just sayin.... Here, too! I clean up afterwards because He who holds the Power makes me sleep in the wet spot if I don't change the sheets which is fair since I'm usually the one who's made the mess even if it was at his behest. Then there's that whole lack of bladder control due to age and endo going on.. it really doesn't help. [:D] Thats part of the "us" clean-up ladies. [;)]

BitaTruble -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:11:35 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Can we reverse that last part? The last thing i wanna do after sex is clean, unless its cleaning us both up before falling into an exhausted sleep. I hear ya, tazzy. Of course, the last thing that I want to do doesn't make a rats ass bit o' difference to Himself! lol

tazzygirl -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:15:00 AM)
LOL... true true... same here... but it feels good to say it, even if it doesnt happen that way!

leadership527 -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:17:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Don't bet on it, while it isn't common, it does happen. There are at least two well known male dominants who pro-domm women in LA. They don't get much business but they do get it. Didn't you mention people down in LA charging for mentoring services? Reasonably, this would have to considered pro-domination also.

SimplyMichael -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 10:20:24 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SocratesNot a) women, in general, have weaker sex drive (libido) than man, they simply don't desire sex and all the other sexual things as strongly as men You say the cutest things sometimes. I have dated women who could wear out a HS football team. Kid you need to get out of the house more often because your world is WAY to small. I had to add this kid, most of the women posting on this board would wear you out sexually, frankly, you and I as a tag team couldn't fuck any of these women into a coma. Sad but true.

LadyPact -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 11:03:16 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: leadership527 quote: ORIGINAL: SimplyMichael Don't bet on it, while it isn't common, it does happen. There are at least two well known male dominants who pro-domm women in LA. They don't get much business but they do get it. Didn't you mention people down in LA charging for mentoring services? Reasonably, this would have to considered pro-domination also. Jeff, I think you're on to something with that one. Same thing for someone who would charge a fee for a one on one instruction for teaching a particular topping skill. It would be one person making a profit from another person. Nobody ever said that the two people involved in the exchange had to be engaging in S/m with each other.

leadership527 -> RE: No Male dominatrices? (6/15/2010 11:11:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact Jeff, I think you're on to something with that one. Same thing for someone who would charge a fee for a one on one instruction for teaching a particular topping skill. It would be one person making a profit from another person. Nobody ever said that the two people involved in the exchange had to be engaging in S/m with each other. Well, I could be convinced that paid for mentoring was not pro-domination if it was all done in 3rd person -- if a typically session looked like a college sociology/psychology class. In other words, if there were no commands flowing from the mentor to the mentee other than those directly related to instruction such as "Here's some homework, get it done by class next friday". I somehow suspect that it is NOT normally done that way though. Honestly, I myself don't do it that way. That's how I ended up with an online slave. I could talk myself blue in the face with the woman but there is just no substitute for the actual experience of having to decide how far trust goes.

Page: << < prev 2 3 4 [5] 6 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875