tazzygirl
Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub quote:
ORIGINAL: tazzygirl quote:
ORIGINAL: brainiacsub The definitions you supplied support my claim, not yours. If you have successfully delivered a baby in the past, possibly multiple times, then you are not operating on faith (which means you have no evidence). Your conviction that you can do it again is reasoned belief. Including this one? Faith as underlying rationality: In this view, all human knowledge and reason is seen as dependent on faith: faith in our senses, faith in our reason, faith in our memories, and faith in the accounts of events we receive from others. Accordingly, faith is seen as essential to and inseparable from rationality. According to René Descartes, rationality is built first upon the realization of the absolute truth "I think therefore I am", which requires no faith. All other rationalizations are built outward from this realization, and are subject to falsification at any time with the arrival of new evidence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faith_and_rationality I have no desire to get in to a semantic debate with you. I had enough of that with Firm already. You are not trying to gain or further understanding. You are just trying to get others to agree with your preconceived ideas. I fail to see what you are trying to accomplish here. And you are assuming yet again. If you look at past religion threads that i have posted on you will notice a huge shift in my thinking on this topic. I tried to gain more understanding today, and i actually believe i have in some aspects. You could also learn a few things from this thread as well, brainiac.
_____________________________
Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt. RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11 Duchess of Dissent 1 Dont judge me because I sin differently than you. If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.
|