barelynangel
Posts: 6233
Status: offline
|
There is a reason that these concepts exist within a WHOLE of something. I believe even in a scene some people speak about its a concept of a dynamic for that length of time no matter what the whole is defined as. You can take actions and put defining adjectives to them without a concept of motive, the dynamic and many times the whole. Its all i would say the majority of times combined into a whole and to attempt to define a part without taking into consideration the whole will lead to misinterpretation. Which is why many times trying to force a foreign idea into a dynamic doesn't work too well and it unbalances the dynamic. The actions of a Man who is a master -- or a Mistress (thought i have no experience with this so don't try and explain same) are part of the whole concept of his existance as the Master. He can order a slave to beat him etc, but he walks a fine line because while he may not feel submissive in accepting such a concept being done to him, the slave very well could feel reactions and emotions etc that hinder or start to errode his mastery of her BECAUSE of his acceptance of such a thing being done to him. Now i know some people can take the concept of beating someone and disengage it from a dynamic but not everyone can nor does because to the dynamic the beating part is the burden of the submissive not the dominant. Many people in M/s relationships don't PLAY or have the concept or understanding of bottoming or such. So for a slave to see her MASTER in a position that he has placed her in and has held her in etc but more so now place her in a position where HE has been, can be enough to errode the line between the two concepts that make up the dynamic. For some, they differentiate or disengage the actions that many times are part of a relationship dynamic because they play, they scene, they are many times in positions wherein they are able to separate actions into concepts of play rather than part of the dynamic make up due to how he holds her in slavery or submission. Tools are a very fragile thing for some and if a slave watches or participates in something wherein she uses the same tools due to his commands on HIM that HE has used to hold her or master her or maintain her in a state of submission in his life -- yeah, it could very well harm the dynamic as a whole. What a lot of people forget is many times tools a Man uses in his mastery of a woman start to have a psychological connection to the tool and a a mindset tends to form from this concept as to her place within the dynamic, therefore, putting meaning and definition to certain actions for her by her that would probably completely unbalance her if her Master suddenly started to have her use them against him. As for those outside the dynamic observing actions -- that's the problem with observation, you don't necessarily KNOW the whole of the concept you are observing and therefore, are probably getting it wrong in definition. angel
< Message edited by barelynangel -- 6/18/2010 12:57:17 PM >
_____________________________
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. R.W. Emerson
|