laurell3
Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005 Status: offline
|
As an opening, I'm a bit annoyed. I have seen probably 10 references to posting in a manner that "isn't submissive" or "isn't slave-like" or "isn't dominant" just in the last week. Am I totally offbase in thinking those statements are silly? Do you truly believe that you can gauge a person's ability to surrender/submit on posts on the internet when they are not submissive to YOU? But this annoyance got me thinking about our different viewpoints, in the more general sense, what does the word submissive mean to you? No, I'm not asking for dictionary definitions, a semantics debate, or the difference between subs and slaves and or limits or the lack thereof, please don't go there. What does it mean for someone to be submissive in the larger sense of the word for you personally? Does your personal definition leave room for reality? Is there an element of fantasy or unrealistic expectations in D/s and/or BDSM that come from the internet? What have you experienced in that regard? The question is about YOUR viewpoint, there are no right or wrong answers and yes, it is vague intentionally. No role is limited from answering this thread.
< Message edited by laurell3 -- 6/21/2010 7:52:25 PM >
_____________________________
I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence. When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.
|