DelightMachine
Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
Turd, Wish I'd said that ... quote:
The Muslim world. They have the monetary and political might to be a factor not only in the middle east, but throughout the world. India would be a nice jumping point. A Muslim empire is very possible. They have a Romanesque pragmatic philosophy; join us, become us, or die. ... [SNIP] The Muslims are the only logical replacement to the current US world influence. And in their case it would be a true empire. Any argument? "The Muslims" are a diverse group and unlikely to form an empire except through some kind of conquest. That's extremely unlikely when you've got Turkey in NATO, a strong Iran, a nuclear Pakistan, a distant Indonesia (the most populous Muslim country) and the U.S. likely to actively oppose any kind of consolidation in the Muslim world. But for the sake of argument, let's say it somehow happened that all the Muslims from Morocco up to and including Iran, and you can throw in Turkey and a few nations from the former U.S.S.R., all became one empire. Except for Turkey, and not much of it, they would have hardly any industry and very little ability, aside from selling oil, to sustain their own economies if we ever stopped trading with them. By the time Muslims could coagulate into an empire, we'll have hybird cars in abundance and we'd build nuclear power plants to make up for the rest of the lost oil. We'd find substitutes for plastic, which I think is where the rest of the petrochemicals go. We'd survive an economic war with them, at least in the long term. Yes, they might have us over an economic barrel for a short while. But we could also slaughter them in a no-holds-barred war. It wouldn't be nice to remove the Muslim population from the oil-producing areas of Saudi Arabia, but we could do it and keep them away as we pumped the oil out ASAP. The Arab and Central Asian Muslims just don't have much of an economy at all, and you need that in order to sustain a war. I think that was our decisive edge in World War II, wasn't it? We could keep producing while the Axis powers couldn't, right? That and all those Russians willing to die on the battlefield, but I don't think Russia could've done it without us. Incidentally, I've read in a bunch of places (but can't for the life of me remember where) that the U.S. spends more on its military than the next largest 25 national military budgets combined. And we are spending LESS of our GNP on defense than we typically spent (as a percentage) during the Cold War. We have a very rich, very productive economy that's growing better than Europe's and better than Japan's. It will finance our huge military for a long, long time to come. And since Americans don't like any wars they think are unnecessary, we're unlikely to get into many unecessary ones that will drain us. Does anybody believe that if the American people seriously saw some other nation seriously threaten us, it wouldn't be ready to go to war?
< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 4/13/2006 4:40:31 PM >
_____________________________
I'd rather be in Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg
|