Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American dominance


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American dominance Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 7:18:24 AM   
FisherKing1963


Posts: 54
Joined: 3/23/2006
Status: offline
::I think you might want to watch (or better yet, read) Blackhawk Down before you draw any conclusions about the moral fortitude of American military personnel.  If you're talking about the moral fortitude of the American civilian leadership at that time, well...that's a different story ::

There you have it! It must be the truth!
He saw it in the movies!

-FK63 

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 7:25:51 AM   
FisherKing1963


Posts: 54
Joined: 3/23/2006
Status: offline
On the moral fortitude of the American Soldier...
 
The modern American soldier is psychologically ingrained with what has come to be known as the 'buddy system'.
Under the buddy system, two soldiers who have enlisted together are kept together throughout their terms of service.
For all others, the buddy system goes into effect shortly after arriving at basic training. New recruits are faced with total immersion into a new and alien way of life, and told to leave their past lives behind:

"I used to wear my faded jeans
Now I'm wearin' army green
I used to date a beauty queen
now I date an M16
I used to drive a cadillac
Now I'm humpin' with a pack
Oh lord I wanna' go
But they won't let me go...
Home.

In addition, troops are forbidden to use first names, many are given nicknames by the instructors...I was given the name 'Bull'  when the Drill Sergeants decided that I resembled the hapless, lumbering character from the TV sitcom 'Night Court'
Service numbers and roster numbers are memorized to further distance recruits from their pasts.
At this juncture soldiers are required to 'buddy up' with another in their squad, usually their bunk mate. These two then become inseperable,  mutually dependent upon, and responsible for eachother to the point that when one is disciplined, the other voluntarily submits to the same punishment in a brazen display of cohesion...this is seen as desireable by the instructors. Troops who resist conforming to this buddy system are given object lessons...for instance they are given a large rock to be carried with them everywhere, the burden of which is to be shared by their buddy. Others are tied together with belts and boot laces.
Perhaps the one truly favorable outcome of the buddy system is it's effect on accountability...if someone is missing, at least one other person notices immediately.
This notwithstanding, the buddy system has a dubious effect on cohesion, and rather than promoting a general comraderie, gives way to an ungainly cliquishness.
The underlying wisdom, however, on the part of our fearless leaders for introducing the buddy system into the military is this:   The American soldier, as stupid as he often appears to be, is smart enough to be unwilling to undergo hardship and risk of life and limb for the sake of abstractions like 'keeping the world safe for democracy' , let alone the securing of oil fields to sustain our petroleum based economy. Today's troops have no idea of what it is to defend one's homeland against foreign aggression. Once they are removed from that which is closest to their hearts...home and family, and sent to fight on foreign soil, they must have some other motivating factor which causes them to carry out orders in the face of danger. In the heat of battle, who would a soldier defend with his life? By whom would a soldier rather die than be regarded as a coward?...Who?...right at his side...his buddy.

-FK63

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 7:26:12 AM   
ScooterTrash


Posts: 1407
Joined: 1/24/2005
From: Indiana
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

quote:

Viet Nam is the prime example


I'm not aware of a single military defeat suffered by the US in Vietnam.  The US failed in Vietnam because the country lost the political will to win the war.

I have to agree, at least for the most part. The biggest issue then was the constant tethering back of the US troops by the powers to be and no clear green light to do what needed done. Perhaps it was the beginning of being politically correct even in wartime. War is not a pretty activity and when you are attempting to win something, restraint is a serious hinderance. Given the same circumstances with a "do what needs done to win" directive, the outcome would have been different, quickly.


_____________________________

Formal symbolic representation of qualitative entities is doomed to its rightful place of minor significance in a world where flowers and beautiful women abound.
-Albert Einstein

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:13:35 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster
The world's population is already larger than what is sustainable in the long term.  It isn't going to be 20 billion; it isn't even going to be 6 billion.  It might go all the way down to 3 billion.


Both sides of this question are just making bald assertions - nothing is truly known either way.

NeedToUseYou:
Nice to see a right-wing thinker admit so much. I can't agree with any of it on any basis, but kudos on the refreshing honesty.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
The US failed in Vietnam because the country lost the political will to win the war.


The purposes of which were....? And how exactly can Vietnam not be seen as a lost war on the part of the U.S.?


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:22:11 AM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ScooterTrash
As for China being some sort of power, unless technology is mysteriously omitted from the equation where we play "the one with the most people wins", I find this highly unlikely. Having dealt with China on the industrial level over last two years, they are having a tough time even entering into industrial competition. Yes, they have cheap labor, end of story. A Superpower?...not likely...they copy, they do not lead.


This is the best snippet in any of the posts here.
 
Some of the post here remind me of people watching a college football game and saying, "You know, we could beat those Texas Longhorns if we could just keep that Vincent Young from running or passing!"
 
Vietnam and Iraq were/are regional conflicts with very limited objectives, and very limiting rules of engagement. In a global encounter, the only objective would be ultimate victory, and the only rule would be, that there are no rules. Using regional conflicts to make conclusions about global encounters is not apples to apples.
 
China could beat the United States right now, if only they could get the United States Navy to stay in port and never fire a shot, so they could ferry millions of soldiers over to California. Actually, that won't work ... they could never feed that army in the field more than a few weeks ... so China could beat America if the United States Navy stays in port, never fires a shot, and the United States contributes two-hundred millions tons of food to the effort.
 
Other countries could beat the United States, if only they could get them to not use any of their technological advantages ... no complete destruction of airfields with cruise missiles, no unmanned aircraft spotting everthing that moves so Stealth aircraft can slip in a kill it ... no destruction of entire industrial complex by submarine launched missiles.
 
All very viable plans.
 
On to that corrupt and morally bancrupt American industry that is willing to use taxpayers lives and money to enrich itself ... exactly how is that any different from how it has always been?

(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:34:11 AM   
FisherKing1963


Posts: 54
Joined: 3/23/2006
Status: offline
::On to that corrupt and morally bancrupt American industry that is willing to use taxpayers lives and money to enrich itself ... exactly how is that any different from how it has always been? ::

Your insight surpasses your years...sadly yet justifiably, so does your cynicism. It is not one bit different...but try telling that to some of these Mclaughlin groupies and insipid smirking , milk-and-water CFR types and you get relegated to the 'aluminum foil hat' bin along with yours truly.

-FK63

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:51:50 AM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FisherKing1963

:: People are to huggy feely, and of course wouldn't approve a war for oil. So, obviously you have to rouse the populace into compliance.::

By flying fucking planes full of the populace into buildings full of even more of the populace?

-FK


Where in my post did I say anything about 911, I would be referring to the WMD's which was the reason given for invading Iraq.

(in reply to FisherKing1963)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:54:50 AM   
pollux


Posts: 657
Joined: 7/26/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang


quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
The US failed in Vietnam because the country lost the political will to win the war.


The purposes of which were....? And how exactly can Vietnam not be seen as a lost war on the part of the U.S.?



The purpose of the war in Viet Nam?  To defend the S. Vietnamese against being overrun by the N. Vietnamese.  To prevent the spread of communism into SE Asia.

How can it not be seen as a lost war?  It can't.  We lost the war.  I didn't say we won the war.  I said the US didn't suffer a single military defeat in Viet Nam.  And that's true.  My point was, we didn't lose the war because of any failure of our military or our technology.  We lost it because our political leadership failed.

I live right next door to a neighborhood of Orlando called the Vimi (Vietnamese) district.  The woman who cuts my hair (uh, shaves my head) is a refugee from what used to be S. Vietnam.  She was 8 years old when the last US helicopter left Saigon in 1975.  You want to get an earful, ask her sometime if she thinks it was a good idea for the US to withdraw from Vietnam, and ask her how well the communist experiment has been working out in her native country.  Ask her what it's like to be a Catholic, or a woman, or an intellectual, or anyone who doesn't care to play ball with the ruling communist party.  Ask her who's driving the Mercedes-Benzes, and the BMWs, in that country.

You will get an education from her on the Vietnam War, my friend.  Yes, you will.


(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 8:54:55 AM   
NeedToUseYou


Posts: 2297
Joined: 12/24/2005
From: None of your business
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Chaingang

quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

NeedToUseYou:
Nice to see a right-wing thinker admit so much. I can't agree with any of it on any basis, but kudos on the refreshing honesty.



I'm right wing as you can get when it comes to global politics. I'm liberal in other regards.

edited to add on further thought....  I don't think such deceptions are the sole realm of conservatives either, every political party bends the truth and distorts facts to get to their goal or soften the impact. Conservatives, or Liberal I don't think it matters in this case really, if you are looking at graph of needed resources and you don't have those resources you need, you have two choices.

A. Let the country go to piss.
B.  Acquire the resource
C. Pray someone thinks of a technological solution which may or may not be forthcoming.

In the present environment there is virtually no chance of securing a stable long-term oil supply without a presence in the middle east. New fuel saving technology is speculative and inadequate at current levels, you don't leave the fate of your country to speculation.

So, I'd be interested in a non-speculative answer, other than the military one. If that can be provided I'm all for non-military solution.

Thanks


< Message edited by NeedToUseYou -- 4/14/2006 9:27:24 AM >

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:03:59 AM   
incognitoinmass


Posts: 428
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Massachusetts
Status: offline
quote:

Suppose someone were to tell you that 9/11 was cooked up by the cryptocracy and that it came close to being completely botched?
That Osama BinLadin has been an agent of the CIA since the Russians were in Afghanistan?
Suppose that someone were to tell you that the entire case against 'Radical Islam' was being orchestrated, everything from 9/11 to WMD to Fallujah to the roadside IED's that are killing US troops to those gruesome beheadings to the present staredown with Iran was nothing but a big fucking charade? a psychodrama? aimed at taking control of certain olifields and destroying one of the last strongholds of monotheist religious fundamentalism on Earth? and that's just for starts!


I would say that someone had lost touch with reality and occupied a paranoid fantasy of his own concoction.



_____________________________

But if, baby, I'm the bottom,
You're the top!

(in reply to NeedToUseYou)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:05:15 AM   
incognitoinmass


Posts: 428
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Massachusetts
Status: offline
quote:

I need to buy more shares of Alcoa, and soon!



Brilliant!

_____________________________

But if, baby, I'm the bottom,
You're the top!

(in reply to stef)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:08:10 AM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
Has anyone else noticed that there's been a whole lotta posts by people who only just joined CM, and that the OP no longer has his (or her) profile up?

Doesn't really matter. Just interesting.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to pollux)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:13:42 AM   
incognitoinmass


Posts: 428
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Massachusetts
Status: offline
quote:

The situation that you have mentioned is one that is a common theme of history down through the ages and not confined to the aftermath of the Revoluntionary War. It was rich,land owning,masons who decided to pursuade the poor and dispossesed to fight for them so they could get the lions share of the spoils from the colonies and not the British Merchant and ruling classes. It was nothing to do with King George,he was just a figurehead ruler who did what Parliament dictated. In all wars it is the rich that compel the poor to fight and die for them, so they can become richer. The poor recieve no reward for their suffering and valour save some cheap metal called medals. The redcoats were the actual kith and kin of the american colonists and did not relish having to fight them. Interestingly,the British fought half the nations of europe in another war that paraleled the Revolutionary War. The won that war yet lost the war for the colonies. They won most of the battles also. yet surrendered twice,once at saratoga and again at yorktown,when the Continental Army was supported by both french and spanish troops

 
Those damn Masons. 

_____________________________

But if, baby, I'm the bottom,
You're the top!

(in reply to theAndrew)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:21:18 AM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
Vietnam and Iraq were/are regional conflicts with very limited objectives, and very limiting rules of engagement. In a global encounter, the only objective would be ultimate victory, and the only rule would be, that there are no rules. Using regional conflicts to make conclusions about global encounters is not apples to apples.
 

Caitlyn, to me, THAT's the best snippit of this thread. Excellent point. 
 
quote:

China could beat the United States right now, if only they could get the United States Navy to stay in port and never fire a shot, so they could ferry millions of soldiers over to California. Actually, that won't work ... they could never feed that army in the field more than a few weeks ... so China could beat America if the United States Navy stays in port, never fires a shot, and the United States contributes two-hundred millions tons of food to the effort.

 
Other countries could beat the United States, if only they could get them to not use any of their technological advantages ... no complete destruction of airfields with cruise missiles, no unmanned aircraft spotting everthing that moves so Stealth aircraft can slip in a kill it ... no destruction of entire industrial complex by submarine launched missiles.
 
All very viable plans.


Yet another excellent point. I can't find the post right now, but I think it was ScooterTrash who said China's technology is still far behind ours. I agree, but I want to point out that a country's ability to invent technology, bring it to market or bring it to the military is not constant over time. Japan began by copying U.S. products, but has become much more inventive in electronics, for instance. If a nation makes the right moves, it can go far over the course of decades.

If I were some kind of decision-maker in the high ranks of the Communist Party (and a somewhat ruthless person with minimal ethics) determined that I wanted to stay in control, keep my family as wealthy, secure and powerful as possible in the long run and improve things in my country (in that order of priorities), I would do just exactly what the Chinese have been doing. I'd clamp down on human rights, kill some protesters when necessary, forge ahead as fast as possible with capitalism, educate the young -- many of them at American universities -- buy off the military as much as was needed, but otherwise not be aggressive with other countries.

These guys are smart, and over time they'll benefit from smart decisions. Not the most evil rulers on the planet, but still bastards. Smart bastards though, and a threat in the long term. 


quote:

On to that corrupt and morally bancrupt American industry that is willing to use taxpayers lives and money to enrich itself ... exactly how is that any different from how it has always been?



I'd make a different point about this -- that corrupt and morally bankrupt American industry is SO clever in stealing from the rest of us that we've long been the richest or close to the richest country on earth on a per capita basis. How very clever of them to steal so much from us and leave us with more money in the end!

This just shows that they're much more dangerous than all those left-wing, socialist and communist governments out there that, when all is said and done, leave their people with less money. Verrrrrrrrry clever, them morally bankrupt American industrialists!

Oh, that's right, someone might say that we must be stealing from the Third World to keep Americans so much better off. But this shows the true craftiness of the morally bankrupt American industrialists -- the countries we do more trade with, even in the Third World, are better off than the countries that we do less trade with! So these incredibly devious, morally bankrupt, utterly crafty American industrialists are managing to steal and steal and steal from people while leaving them with more money in the end!! This is outrageous! How can we tolerate such criminality!

< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 4/14/2006 9:38:06 AM >


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to caitlyn)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:28:06 AM   
UtopianRanger


Posts: 3251
Status: offline
quote:

As for China being some sort of power, unless technology is mysteriously omitted from the equation where we play "the one with the most people wins", I find this highly unlikely. Having dealt with China on the industrial level over last two years, they are having a tough time even entering into industrial competition. Yes, they have cheap labor, end of story. A Superpower?...not likely...they copy, they do not lead


Well…. Normally that might be the case, but when you add corporate greed into the mix, it distorts and changes the whole picture.  

As I said in previous thread….the PLA are masters at using capitalistic greed against us. They’ve essentially used our own best attribute to de-industrialize us.  They know these greedy pseudo-aristocrats who run these corporations want access to their markets, so they bribe them in exchange for technology transfers. Then after they’ve infused our own technology back into their industrial base, they suddenly come back at us as competitors, using their prison/slave labor as a huge advantage. 

So, It’s futile to even begin to try to compare China’s industrial base to anything else, because its evolutionary cycle hasn’t been fully completed yet.  

Right now folks in the metals commodities are happy as all hell. That happiness is going to be short lived.... China has single handedly driven up the prices on scrap, tin, copper, and stainless to thirty year highs. So what are they going to do with all these metals? They’re building steel plants right now, and will run them and compete against us with our technology and their slave labor. And that’s just the beginning! Wait till they start manufacturing automobiles. I read something a while ago from the EIR, which said by 2008, they’ll be introducing automobiles to the US market for under 8k a pop – Hang around and watch what happens.  

As some folks think we’re mad at Bill Clinton for a blow job? Nah… try again. I blame Bill Clinton, John Podesta , George- read my lips- Bush, ‘’the theory of engagement’’ and greedy globalism for what’s going to come in the future.



 - R


< Message edited by UtopianRanger -- 4/14/2006 9:36:23 AM >


_____________________________

"If you are going to win any battle, you have to do one thing. You have to make the mind run the body. Never let the body tell the mind what to do... the body is never tired if the mind is not tired."

-General George S. Patton


(in reply to ScooterTrash)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:29:03 AM   
Chaingang


Posts: 1727
Joined: 10/24/2005
Status: offline
Caitlyn:
I still think China could do it now. In 20 years most certainly. That's how you posed the question - with a forward looking view, and I think China is absolutely an emerging superpower. I think it's odd that ScooterTrash identifies China's tendency to emulate others as a fault - what precisely did the Romans do? They copied the Greeks.

pollux:
Why should an American care what happens to people in Vietnam? I have always opposed that "world police" bullshit. We got stuff to do back home, thank you very much.

< Message edited by Chaingang -- 4/14/2006 9:57:57 AM >


_____________________________

"Everything flows, nothing stands still." (Πάντα ῥεῖ καὶ οὐδὲν μένει) - Heraclitus

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:45:23 AM   
incognitoinmass


Posts: 428
Joined: 10/8/2005
From: Massachusetts
Status: offline
quote:

Why should an American care what happens to people in Vietnam? I have always opposed that "world police" bullshit. We got stuff to do back home, thank you very much.


Exactly. After all, you can take kumbaya kumbaya just so far.  I mean really. 

The people in Darfur hear what you're saying.  Screw 'em. 

_____________________________

But if, baby, I'm the bottom,
You're the top!

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:49:19 AM   
Mercnbeth


Posts: 11766
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: incognitoinmass

quote:

The situation that you have mentioned is one that is a common theme of history down through the ages and not confined to the aftermath of the Revoluntionary War. It was rich,land owning,masons who decided to pursuade the poor and dispossesed to fight for them so they could get the lions share of the spoils from the colonies and not the British Merchant and ruling classes. It was nothing to do with King George,he was just a figurehead ruler who did what Parliament dictated. In all wars it is the rich that compel the poor to fight and die for them, so they can become richer. The poor recieve no reward for their suffering and valour save some cheap metal called medals. The redcoats were the actual kith and kin of the american colonists and did not relish having to fight them. Interestingly,the British fought half the nations of europe in another war that paraleled the Revolutionary War. The won that war yet lost the war for the colonies. They won most of the battles also. yet surrendered twice,once at saratoga and again at yorktown,when the Continental Army was supported by both french and spanish troops

 
Those damn Masons. 


this slave can see it is time to break out more tin-foil hats...
 
P.S. hey, theAndrew, "National Treasure" was not a fact-based historical documentary film.

(in reply to incognitoinmass)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 9:49:19 AM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
CHAINGANG: "what precisely did the Romans do? They copied Greece."

No, the Greeks never had the Roman's organizational skills, which is why the Romans were able to create such a large and long-lasting empire. There were some Greek-led empires left after Alexander the Great (Selucids, Ptolemy's) but not for as long as Rome, and they weren't as large as the Roman empire or as well organized.

The Romans had a flair for law and rules. They also had domes. The Greeks never had domes. Big round high domes. Never underestimate the importance of domes to civilization. Domes. And roads. Lotsa roads. Big long walls, too, but never forget those domes. 

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to Chaingang)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American domin... - 4/14/2006 10:18:00 AM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ArtCatDom


quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine
Art, when it's the U.S. supporting a dictatorship, you get on your high horse and say we're supporting evil. When the nasty dictatorship is run by Fidel Castro, you only describe them as humanitarian.


Talk about out of context. Wearing the tinfoil hat today?

You will note my comments about Russia and Chine preceding my commnets about Castro's Cuba. If we can normalize relations with China, we can do it with Cuba. Goose and Gander, buddy.


Art, if we recognized Russia and China rather than invaded them, that was because we had sense enough not to engage in nuclear war. It's an apples-to-oranges comparison you're making, OK, buddy? Also, I notice that the left has become much more critical of Russia and China the more capitalist those countries have become. No coincidence.

"Tinfoil hat"? Oh, that's clever. I hadn't heard that one in a while. Where did you pick up that?

quote:

Also, the problem is the brutal oppression of people trying to struggle against those dictatorships. People are free to choose or apathetically accept whatever government they want in their country. They want a Big Poppa to take care of them, their business. My problem is the utterly unacceptable and unethical intervention to prevent the removal of such authortarian regimes.


I'm trying to unravel where the morality is supposed to lie here. If you slaughter your own people, that's supposed to be all right if they don't struggle against you, but if the U.S. intervenes to remove these regimes it's "utterly unacceptable and unethical." Actually, there are people who have struggled against Castro. Many of them are in jail. Others had to escape on boats. They come to America and your fellow lefties call them nuts.

quote:

And by the by Delight: F*@k you.


Thank you for the offer, Sweetheart, but I'm wearing a collar of consideration. You'll have to see my Mistress about that. I have to tell you that I'll be recommending to her that she refuse because you're just not my type.

quote:

I've bled in service to this country. Literally.


Sincerely, I thank you for your service.

quote:

Pull your head out of your neocon ass to see not everyone who disagrees with what our country has done and continues to do is anti-American. Speaking out is not only a right, but a duty


No, Art, it's not speaking out that's the duty. THINKING is the duty. That involves more than spouting off. You have a feeling that America is doing bad things in the world far in excess of the good. You actually do put forth reasons for that, and I give you credit for it, but they're not well-thought-out reasons. If you actually tried to approach the question of what's best for people in America and outside of it, without preconceptions, and started doing a little more thinking, I believe you'd be better off. I don't think you're stupid or completely closed minded. You do seem to come down against America all the time, though, and you've expressed no concern for this country's legitimate security needs. Sounds like hate to me.  


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to ArtCatDom)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Emerging Superpowers the downfall of American dominance Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078