porcelaine
Posts: 5020
Joined: 7/24/2006 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: submissivemale22 Mind you this is a bit more complex of a query than it may seem. Obviously we all enjoy being submissive to the extent that we receive gratification from interacting with dommes. However, if given the option to be equally fulfilled by vanilla relationships instead, would you take it? I see that as a different form of fulfillment. One that wouldn't include the tenets of the power exchange that I prefer. However, I don't relegate that to merely non kink situations. I've encountered the same within the BDSM landscape as well. I have a noticeable bias for men that have an innate need to own and inflict varying controls that are sadistic in nature. It is not a mandatory component for all dominants and I would view engagement with them akin to the stance you've presented in your question. To set aside those things for a relationship that offered some measure of fulfillment but failed to address the things I want in a power exchange would take some internal wrangling. I have never encountered anyone that has compelled me to dismiss the pivotal for a different flavor so to speak. However, I have interacted with those that wanted far more than I fathomed but didn't find myself ill at ease. I'm highly attracted to men that place heavy demands upon me, and would view the compromised situation and the non kink environment as sorely lacking. ~porcelaine
_____________________________
His will; my fate.
|