CaringandReal
Posts: 1397
Joined: 2/15/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Missokyst I view blind obedience as assinine. Anytime someone proposes a senario where you do something without thought, whether or not you trust someone is stupid. What the fuck is wrong with thinking, reasoning, and responding to something because it is right, and not because you are doing it out of the habit to follow orders. I would have made a crappy soldier in times of war, and I make a lousy sheep. Blind obedience of someone you trust, still requires thought. If your partner suddenly flipped out and told you to do something harmful, it would still be you taking the flack. I'm having a deja vu experience reading your post so I think I'll respond to it. (It's probably just due to the fact that a lot of similar topics come up in these forums.) But in my deja vu I already said, sometime before now: Stupid things can be profound if they're done by smart people...and vice-versa, of course. Take "I'm having a deja vu experience, reading your..." and compare it to "Through all he said, even through his appalling sentimentality, I was reminded of something--an elusive rhythm, a fragment of lost words, that I had heard somewhere a long time ago. For a moment a phrase tried to take shape in my mouth and my lips parted like a dumb man's, as though there was more struggling upon them than a wisp of startled air. But they made no sound, and what I had almost remembered was uncommunicable forever." For me, all the essential thinking and reasoning occur long before I become someone's slave. After that's it's up to the dominant how much of my head I use or am even allowed to keep. Dominants vary a lot in that regard. There's nothing wrong with thinking, reasoning, and responding to something because it is right, but there's also nothing wrong with deciding he is right, no matter what, and then, if he desires it, becoming an instrument. Instruments still think, sometimes even deeply, they just refuse the free exercise of their wills as an expression of their thoughts (which is itself an exercise of will, but it's going in the right direction, I think, toward diminution). Also, blind obedience, once you get used to it, is by far the easiest type of obedience there is. "Easy" should not always be the highest value in selecting something, but when it comes to an endeavor as difficult as a submissive's obedience, anything that makes it easier seems like a bit of baraka, mitzvah, grace, even. Finally, for those of us who eroticize trust and dependence, blindness can be thrilling or provide a jolt of joy. "If your partner suddenly flipped out and told you to do something harmful, it would still be you taking the flack." *Blink.* Of course. And, hopefully, you have thought carefully about that possibility and how you will feel about it, before you commit to blindly obeying. It's one of the more obvious scenarios to imagine, after all. If it deters you, wonderful, you've probably made a very wise decision. If it doesn't, who's to say what sort of decision it was, given all you know about yourself vs. the unknown void outside observers know of the subject?
_____________________________
"A friend who bleeds is better" --placebo "How seldom we recognize the sound when the bolt of our fate slides home." --thomas harris
|