PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DaddysInkedSlut So how do YOU define the term alpha male? I don't, any longer. There are too many assumptions behind the idea of alpha/beta men that I don't think bear any real interrogation. One is that people look for easy corollaries from other species. Humans aren't the same as gorillas, still less so wolves. We don't operate the same way. Human nature is not gorilla-nature or wolf-nature. We have large, successful societies in which we control a huge amount of our environment. Other species don't. Humans are thousands of times more advanced than those other species. We're also a lot more comfortable in our lives. We don't live day to day - generally - in fear for our lives. Human life is not, again generally, 'nasty, brutish and short' (Hobbes). Some might say it's almost embarrassingly silly to compare some pampered, western businessman who is a wow at his car-selling techniques with a wolf that's fought for it's life over and again to reach the top of the pack. The second lives harshly in the wild. The first is so distanced from such wild living that he's able to relax in his armchair and actually enjoy watching films about it on his telly - surrounded as he is with all the high-tech gadgetry that he's come to rely on for his survival. He might think he's a grizzled, tough old wolf - but next to one of those he's an effete blob - as beta as it's possible to be beta. Another thing is that this idea of 'alpha' and 'beta' provides simple categories that have passed into pop psychology just too easily for my liking. Most of those pop-psychological bits of wisdom of the past have turned out to be crap. I just have a strong idea that this way of categorising will go that way, too. Beware those who flog business-psychology most of all. Business psychologists make too much money feeding the vanity of people who will read what they want to read for me to trust what they have to say. It's those sorts of psychologists, of course, who've retailed this 'alpha/beta' idea most of all. Lastly, humans have shown they're capable of a lot. Arguably, a lot more than those other higher mammals. Why on earth would we want to get into copying them by borrowing from the way they live in their societies? Moreover, are there any species of animals that have alpha/beta structures and which are not at least endangered? Why should we limit ourselves with these categories? Nah. No offence to you or your thread, DIS, but I've come too keenly to notice, these days, a certain incongruity. This is that the wealthier and more comfortable people are, the more they're wont to talk about how their lives are 'just like those of (the nobler sorts of) animals. The alpha/beta idea is a preoccupation of the opulent West. For me, it's junk-food-psychology/anthropology. Drivel, at bottom.
< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 7/18/2010 1:53:54 PM >
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|