BitaTruble -> RE: Why do Doms...???? (8/2/2010 5:50:58 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Musicmystery I think this is well outlined all the way around. Go in peace. Being well outlined doesn't color in the picture. [;)] Perhaps I can do so because I believe I understand what you all are talking about. MM, please correct me if I'm wrong but what I gather (and also what I believe) is that regardless of what I may see when I view my reflection, even that reflection is going to be colored by my own perceptions which may have been or are presently being influenced by outside circumstance. I can be completely self-aware and still get some things wrong even when I know the subject as intimately as I do.. the subject being *me.* As an example: for several years I took all of the responsibility for my first failed relationship in M/s. I knew, intellectually, that it does take two to make a relationship work and only one to break it up and I spent all that time thinking that it was *my* fault for allowing myself to be put into a bad place and truly felt that since I was the one who put myself there, I was to blame. Himself comes along and points out that yes, I am responsible for the part that I played but so, too, was the other party responsible for the part they played and in no way shape or form should I take the responsibility for his actions and what transpired due to those actions. In other words .. his perspective allowed me to change my perspective. To see myself through his eyes opened up new areas for me to discover and study .. well, me. Now, it could be said, I suppose, that his was an opinion but truly, it wasn't. It was simply a truth that I failed to acknowledge because I didn't actually see it for myself. Once he pointed it out, it became quite clear to me and I 'got' it. The objective truth of the situation. I was to blame for my part.. Master A was to blame for his part. The truth was not as I saw it.. and no doubt the truth would not have been as Master A saw it.. but, as with most things.. the truth was somewhere in the middle and truth is not subjective or it wouldn't be truth. Facts are facts. That said, ignorance is not, necessarily, posturing nor is it a lie.. it is just ignorance. I hope that as I age, I become less ignorant about the world around me and what lies beneath the surface of my own skin. I firmly believe that words have meaning and that one should mean what they say and say what they mean. When I say that I like music, that's a truth.. until someone says.. but do you like X Y Z music and I have to admit that, no, I don't like X Y Z music. It wasn't a lie to say that I like music.. it was an ignorant statement and what I should be saying is that I like *some* music. That would be a truth. I know myself pretty well after all these years but everything I know is colored by .. everything I know. That's when it becomes less about truth and more about my own perspective. Keeping my mind open to other perspectives allows me continued growth. Now, some of those perspectives of others are going to be off base but some are going to be quite accurate and given that truth really is objective and not subjective it behooves me to hone my skill in discerning the difference, weigh the other perspective and, ultimately, try to arrive at the objective truth rather than my subjective interpretation. Am I at least in the ball park because if not, then the truth is.. I didn't understand a blasted thing you said. ::grins::
|
|
|
|