Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Iran - You Make the Call...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Iran - You Make the Call... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 7:05:21 AM   
EnglishDomNW


Posts: 493
Joined: 12/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

We like obliterating entire cities repeatedly untill there's nothing but ash.


Isn't there an obliteration quota? I mean, once you've obliterated something, can it be obliterated again? I'd have thought it was pretty likely to be gone immediately after the first obliterating.

Although to be honest, I'm not an expert on obliteration. 

P.S. Playstation, warm milk, lots and lots of rest.



< Message edited by EnglishDomNW -- 4/20/2006 7:11:48 AM >

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 9:22:42 AM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
You've obviously never played double-obliteration tag.

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 9:52:58 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I find this end of it worsening and worsening.  So we can or can't fly some goddamn 55.2 million dollar or whatever airplane with or without re-fueling several times around the world before dropping several tons of metal out of the sky.  Nuke weapons......even in the 60's there was enough shit laying around to blow up the globe 60 or 70 times over, and I am quite sure we are improving on that.......How many fucking earths do we really need to blow up? So these guys got nuke capability, so let's sashay in there and inspect them cause we don't trust 'em.  They are after all totally heathen barbarians.... OK, Mohammed; I'll be over there to check your shit out on monday, have the doors unlocked.  Why won't Mohammed who obviously so far has forgotten where the remote is, start looking for it and say, I don't think so, Infidel? 

Already fucked up in Iraq, and now we are gonna hep Iran to a couple cups of our wisdom?  Goddammit, look at Iraq... so now the official word from the white house is that we went there to free the country from tyranny.  Everyday, some son-of-a-bitch straps a jerry can of gas on his ass and squaredances an american serviceman to Allah.  If they didn't want Saddam there, if he was so horrific in terms of his governance of the people in THEIR minds, do you think that these fuckers are too shy to ask him to dance?     

So here is the final on this one, kids. We are paying the shit outta the war, we one-wayed all that iron over there, now they are gonna scrap it and sell the shit back to us so we can dump the shit in Iran.

Let us consider prudence, for once.

 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 3:46:02 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or
OK, when have we NOT fucked with them ? They have been treated like whaleshit since the end of WW2, and I don't mean in a nice way.
Yes we came to them. If you get some international news instead of the TV you will find Osama Bin Laden's statement. We are not secure, you will not be secure.

Who do you mean "them" and how do you mean "fucked." Define your terms. By them, do you mean "Muslims"? We supported the Bosnians against the Serbs who were killing them, we gave millions to the Palestinians, we tossed the Iraqis out of Kuwait and protected Saudi Arabians and people in the other Gulf states in the process. Before that we were supporting Saddam in his war against Iran in order to keep Iran from threatening the rest of the Gulf. And we bought their oil at market prices. True, we didn't overthrow dictators and sheikhs, not when we didn't think we had democracies to replace them.

Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, where we helped the locals toss out the invading Soviets. We supported the Pakistan as well in the past.

If you mean Palestine and Israel, could you possibly admit that after the Holocaust there was a legitimate need for Jews to have a homeland where they could have their own government? Maybe because there was so much anti-semitism? You are against anti-semitism, right? I ask because there's been some comment on this thread that you're anti-semitic yourself. Is that true? My sympathy for Palestinians is considerably diminished by their Jew-hating support for terrorism. By the way, do you think terrorism is justified? I ask because you sound like every evil in the world is the fault of the U.S., Israel and the bankers. 

Yeah, we've been fucking those Arabs all along. You seem to believe what you hear from lying Islamofascists. It couldn't possibly be that they are slaves to a radical ideology based on their cult-like adherence to an evil interpretation of Islam, could it? Nah, it's all our fault. You sound like you hate your country.

quote:

PS, it really does matter VERY MUCH how we got here.

No. As far as getting to a satisfactory conclusion, it doesn't matter at all.  

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:09:05 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
Curious to see whether you're going to get a straight answer to this one.

I'd just throw in that not ALL Palestinians hate Jews.  Far from it.  In fact, I'd bet that most Palestinians are not anti-Semites in any reasonable sense of the word.  Ahmadinejad, on the other hand...

quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

If you mean Palestine and Israel, could you possibly admit that after the Holocaust there was a legitimate need for Jews to have a homeland where they could have their own government? Maybe because there was so much anti-semitism? You are against anti-semitism, right? I ask because there's been some comment on this thread that you're anti-semitic yourself. Is that true? My sympathy for Palestinians is considerably diminished by their Jew-hating support for terrorism. By the way, do you think terrorism is justified? I ask because you sound like every evil in the world is the fault of the U.S., Israel and the bankers. 

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:09:52 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

BTW;

Can anyone answer the question of how we got to be the ones who say who can have nukes ? Only we and Israel have the most, and don't want anyone else to have them.


Not exactly, no one gives two shits if, say, Ireland had them, or the Netherlands.

quote:

The US was the first to use nukes, nobody else.

You would have preferred that we invaded Japan, very likely at the cost of many more lives? Are you in favor of saving lives or opposed? I think you're just in favor of attacking the United States, at least rhetorically. I'm surprised you don't have some kind words for Tojo's regime.

quote:

We are talking about sovreign countries who would be pleased to leave us alone, but if you were Iran, what would you do ?

First, you just brought up Japan, which was not pleased to leave us alone in the early 1940s. Second, you really don't know shit about Iran, do you? This is the regime that invaded our embassy and held people in it hostage. This is the regime where mullahs condemned Salman Rushdie to death. This is the regime that has been left alone but has this suspicious thirst for nukes and lies about it repeatedly, saying it wants nuclear power when it's sitting on top of a sea of oil. This is the country that financed terrorists in Lebanon and Israel. This is the country that violates the human rights of its own citizens right and left.

Terrorists and nukes. Helluva combination. Past history of violating international norms and being aggressive. Oh, you're absolutely right. The only countries to be suspicious of are the United States and Israel.

quote:

We constantly tell them that they have no right to defend themselves, well against almost everybody else OK, but not us. That is fucking tyranny.

"Tyranny" surprising that that's a word in your vocabulary. Not surprising at all that you use it against the U.S.

"Right to defend themselves"? Who's threatening them and how? 

quote:

Israel has over 100 neutron bombs, why are they OK ? Because they won't wreck the place ? It is OK for them to have them but nobody else, and that seems logical. That is sad. That is the saddest part, that people cannot seem to look at things objectively.

"Objectively." What a joke. OBJECTIVELY, Israel won't wreck the place. That's because simple possession of nukes isn't the problem -- it's WHO possesses the nukes. But everybody, and I mean everybody but you, already knows that. OBJECTIVELY we can't be sure that Iran won't wreck the place, and once they have nukes, it's a helluva lot harder to prevent them from wrecking the place.

Term, you accept at face value what the enemies of the United States say about themselves, even when there's evidence out there that shows those enemies can't be trusted to tell the truth. Then you are overly suspicious about any move the United States makes. Your policy ideas, if adopted, would put us at risk. You have no judgment whatever.

That's how you can make an assinine statement like this:
quote:

Who has ever used an atomic weapon other than the US ? Perhaps it is we who need inspections.




_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:14:47 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

I'd just throw in that not ALL Palestinians hate Jews.  Far from it.  In fact, I'd bet that most Palestinians are not anti-Semites in any reasonable sense of the word.


Good point. I'll concede that it's not all and I don't know whether it's a majority. But I'll say that their society certainly tolerates terrorism and much of it supports terrorism. And I'll concede also that it's difficult for Palestinians to oppose the terrorists among them when those terrorists are well armed. But there's a helluva lot of support for terrorism in Palestine, and nothing justifies that.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:25:38 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FangsNfeet

So Iran only has 100 people willing to blow themselves up in order to cause chaos around the globe. That's it? Only 100? That's weak in comparison as to how many americans are willing to die by going into Iran with guns and gernades killing everything in sight untill killed. That's only a potential of 100 explosions they can cause. One american air strike or a battle ship is more capable of making 100 confirmed explosions.

Iran, BRING IT ON! You want to get nuts? Lets get nuts! You're making bombs? We have bombs. You have hundreds of people ready to die for you? We have thousands ready to die for the USA. You like blowing up cars, airplanes, and buildings? We like obliterating entire cities repeatedly untill there's nothing but ash. Your little speech is nothing but the start of game we like to call Quale Hunting. We are the Vice Preident and you are our best friend. Are you ready to play? I know I am. Our nukes are already pointing at you.  


Fangs, thank you for that statement. I think it was completely appropriate. If anyone criticizes you for saying "many americans are willing to die by going into Iran with guns and gernades killing everything in sight untill killed," they should know you of course meant "in battle." And the idiotic criticism about "repeatedly" obliterating cities misses the fact that you were obviously referring to our first annhiliating Hiroshima, then doing the same to Nagasaki.

Your post was pure poetry and exactly what was called for.

< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 4/20/2006 4:51:12 PM >


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:30:30 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW
Although to be honest, I'm not an expert on obliteration. 
P.S. Playstation, warm milk, lots and lots of rest.


No, you're not any kind of expert on obliteration, are you? Count your blessings. If America's response to terrorism results in you're being protected, you'll be spared from being an expert on obliteration. That's the goal.

As for the substance of your comment, see my last post.  

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:38:25 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: EnglishDomNW
I edited this because I'm beginning to believe the post above was written without a shred of humour or irony.

And that's humourously ironic.


Irony is a bit less valuable when fighting against enemies who would obliterate us and who might, in their stupidity, try to do it and kill millions of innocents in the process.

When we're discussing how best to respond to radical, half-mad and three-quarters-mad radicals who commit acts of terrorism and who want nukes, then are FangsNfeet's comments and attitude more appropriate or are yours?

FangsNfeet is obviously enraged at people who commit atrocities. Are you?
FangsNfeet is obviously ready to do what's necessary to stop the situation, at least if we're attacked. Are you?

Or is it more important to appear humorous or ironic?

In other words, are you as effete and decadent as you sound?

And would you have welcomed similar words and a similar sentiment from an American talking about Hitler in, say, 1940?  

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to EnglishDomNW)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:44:03 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lordandmaster

Curious to see whether you're going to get a straight answer to this one.

I'd just throw in that not ALL Palestinians hate Jews.  Far from it.  In fact, I'd bet that most Palestinians are not anti-Semites in any reasonable sense of the word.  Ahmadinejad, on the other hand...


As someone who has seen more than my share of wars (and modern not-wars), it's my considered opinion that at least 90 percent of the population of any country just wants to be left alone to kick out babies and make a life.

It would be nice if, say for ten years or so, the other 10%'s just cooled it and tried to get along.

The really really sad thing is that, from a global point of view, peace is an abstract concept credible only because there are occasional moments when people stop killing each other for a while.

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:46:42 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy
even if this is intended as pure irony, this kind of thing is why some people over the world have stopped trusting the US.


Yeah, people don't trust us until they want some of that martial spirit directed at their own mortal enemies. I'll make the same point I made to the other Brit: You liked it when we displayed that spirit against Hitler, didn't you? You even liked it against Stalin.

You know, there's really nothing in your attitude that couldn't be cured by 50 years under a totalitarian regime, which is what your Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain was, at best, ready to consign the Poles, Czechs, Slovaks, Hungarians and others to, and what they wound up receiving during the Cold War. People in those countries seem to have a better appreciation for defense against evil regimes. Perhaps the United States should follow a policy of allowing people in other countries to live in terror for a period of decades before coming to their rescue. Then our martial spirit would be better appreciated.

< Message edited by DelightMachine -- 4/20/2006 4:48:39 PM >


_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 4:50:53 PM   
JohnWarren


Posts: 3807
Joined: 3/18/2005
From: Delray Beach, FL
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine
quote:

The US was the first to use nukes, nobody else.

You would have preferred that we invaded Japan, very likely at the cost of many more lives? Are you in favor of saving lives or opposed? I think you're just in favor of attacking the United States, at least rhetorically. I'm surprised you don't have some kind words for Tojo's regime.


Also it would not only be us invading.  The Soviets, freed from the Nazi threat and salivating for a warm water port had already taken the Kurile Islands and were posed to begin an invasion of the main islands.  Japan would have been another Korea, cut through the middle.  Millions of Japanese would have died in those invasions and the aftermaths

_____________________________

www.lovingdominant.org

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 5:04:09 PM   
Lordandmaster


Posts: 10943
Joined: 6/22/2004
Status: offline
I accept all those arguments, and really can't object too strongly to the use of the A-bomb in Japan, but there are plenty of people who think Nagasaki was a war crime.  Hiroshima was one thing--but doing it AGAIN three days later might not have been necessary.  A lot of it had to do with brinksmanship.

(in reply to JohnWarren)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 5:13:41 PM   
wnts2Bapet


Posts: 4
Joined: 3/6/2006
Status: offline
I usually don't post things, but in this case.  I would suggest that the Crusades be studied. When muslims counquered all of the middle east and all of northern africa and all the way east to spain and parts of europe. The radicals in the religion want to conquer the whole world this time.

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 5:18:05 PM   
DelightMachine


Posts: 652
Joined: 1/21/2006
Status: offline
I'm no expert, but I understand that one of the defenses for Nagasaki was that we weren't getting a response to Hiroshima. I could even be convinced we didn't need to bomb Nagasaki. I understand there isn't too much to recommend the Allied decision to bomb Cologne -- at least the way we did -- either.

It's really a bad idea for anyone to get this country riled up. It's really a bad idea for this country to get into a war that isn't necessary, and I don't blame anyone for needing to be thoroughly convinced before supporting our going into war.

If anyone thinks we're too militaristic, martial and bloodthirsty now, just wait until after one of our cities is put out by a WMD, something I expect will eventually happen. God help us, but God help the citizens of any country we believe we have to pummel, and then God, please help us then.

_____________________________

I'd rather be in
Chargoggagoggmanchauggagoggchaubunagungamaugg

(in reply to Lordandmaster)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 6:43:41 PM   
ArtCatDom


Posts: 478
Joined: 1/20/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DelightMachine

Who do you mean "them" and how do you mean "fucked." Define your terms. By them, do you mean "Muslims"? We supported the Bosnians against the Serbs who were killing them, we gave millions to the Palestinians, we tossed the Iraqis out of Kuwait and protected Saudi Arabians and people in the other Gulf states in the process. Before that we were supporting Saddam in his war against Iran in order to keep Iran from threatening the rest of the Gulf. And we bought their oil at market prices. True, we didn't overthrow dictators and sheikhs, not when we didn't think we had democracies to replace them.

Bin Laden was in Afghanistan, where we helped the locals toss out the invading Soviets. We supported the Pakistan as well in the past.


I agree with all of this except for your statement about the Iraq-Iran War. We assisted Iraq because they were a secular government willing to play ball with us. The mullahs seized power in Iran through the discontent caused by the oppresive practices of the US-supported Shah. Iraq invaded Iran, not the other way around. Iran's government simply was not a threat to the countries around it, except Iraq (who started the war). Also quite notable that during that very war is when Saddam greatly expanded his WMD capabilities with U.S. assistance.

Again, I agree with the rest of your assertions without doubt. I especially agree with you on the issue of the Bosnians and Serbs. For me it sticks in memory jokingly as the first time 10th Mountain was deployed into the mountains instead of everywhere else on the planet. (10th Mtn Division is near constantly deployed. Good rule of thumb is when the 82nd Airborne is stuck someplace, 10th Mountain is stuck with them.) We lead the way in stopping a terrible atrocity from repeating itself in those hilly lands. Our contribution and the terrible witness made by our soldiers cannot be underestimated. Notable to me that a number of Europeans nations objected to the States' comparison between the ethnic purging and the Holocaust. Given how many of them pack their mostly Islamic ethnic immigrants into ghettos (painfully ironic echoes there), it speaks volumes. Europe criticizes the United States for it's "bigotry" and "intolernace". Seems a bit hypocritical, no? (Then again it's the same land where you can say Muslims are muderous donkey rapers but you get SIX years in jail for daring to say that most Jews who died in concentration camps perished from disease and starvation. Go Team Freedom Europe!)

quote:

If you mean Palestine and Israel, could you possibly admit that after the Holocaust there was a legitimate need for Jews to have a homeland where they could have their own government? Maybe because there was so much anti-semitism? You are against anti-semitism, right? I ask because there's been some comment on this thread that you're anti-semitic yourself. Is that true? My sympathy for Palestinians is considerably diminished by their Jew-hating support for terrorism. By the way, do you think terrorism is justified? I ask because you sound like every evil in the world is the fault of the U.S., Israel and the bankers.


We diverge quite a bit in opinion here. Before the founding of Israel, Jews there committed acts of terrorism against the British and Arabs. The Jews taught the Palestinians the ropes of terrorism in the school of hard knocks. Groups like Irgun and the Stern Gang (and it's successor Lehi) delivered to the Arab world the lesson of terrorism. Members of Lehi refused to enter a plea in British courts based on the "fact" they were an illegal occupying force and therefore have no jurisdiction. They even refused to plea for amnesty when that would have spared them the death penalty. Doesn't that sound eerily familiar? The point is I have little sympathy for Israel, though I have no problem at all with Jews. Israel's founding is mired with terrorist actions and they persist in illegal military operations. On the counterpoint, they are dealing with quite the mess of Palestine. Part of this is their own doing, such as seperating villages from their farmland. However, most of it is not. The two main political parties they have to deal with are corrupt bureaucrats and militant revolutionaries. They have to deal with the presence of additional militant groups orchestrated by outside forces. (These are mainly Iran, Syria and the Saudi royal family.) To me honestly the best would be for Israel *and* Palestine to admit the wrongs they've done.

*meow*

(in reply to DelightMachine)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/20/2006 11:10:21 PM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
Ahmadinejad has Jack and shit and Jack went home. Before it's all said and done I garuntee that he will going down on President Bush like a ZETA at a Sigma Chi frat party.

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to Mercnbeth)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/21/2006 12:21:32 AM   
Termyn8or


Posts: 18681
Joined: 11/12/2005
Status: offline
I just jumped down here:

"could you possibly admit that after the Holocaust there was a legitimate need for Jews to have a homeland where they could have their own government"

Yerah well I need a new pair of glasses, a computer and a better car. Where the fuck is my money with which to do these thing. YOU OWE IT TO ME.

T

(in reply to FangsNfeet)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Iran - You Make the Call... - 4/21/2006 6:43:24 AM   
FangsNfeet


Posts: 3758
Joined: 12/3/2004
Status: offline
Why is this in reply go me? Are you quoting me? I don't remember asking anyone that question. Also, I don't owe you a damn thing.

_____________________________

I'm Godzilla and you're Japan

(in reply to Termyn8or)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Iran - You Make the Call... Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094