RE: The role of race in conservative media (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion



Message


truckinslave -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 8:54:30 AM)

quote:

The "New Black Panther Party" has been around since the mid-nineties


They didn't get any ink until they showed up at a polling place with clubs. That's why they're in the news, VG. They chose the timing. Same for Wright. He wasn't much of a story until one of his congregants wasn't leading presidential polls. As far as:

"As well as an entire chorus of birthers, racist picket sign holders, and people saying "Barack is a Kenyan Muslim Socialist/Marxist/Nazi who kills babies, kills them with the guns he confiscates from decent, hard-working 'mericans!"


I've got nothing against good political hyperbole, so certainly I take no offense at the above. But tell me why it wasn't racist to show GWB as the Joker, but it is to portray 0bama0 that way? There is a huge segment of our society that calls ALL criticism of Ear Leader racist... We all, I hope, know racism when we see it, but this made-up indignation has to stop.
Or not. It's losing effectiveness; people are becoming decensitized.

That's not a good thing, in the long run. But all this crying of "wolf!! wolf!!" does act as a bulwark to those people who would call me a racist when I call for the prosection of people with makeshift weapons making racial comments at polling places, or say that I want SCOTUS to define- for the first time- exactly what constitutes a "natural born citizen".

There are an awful lot of things about 0bama0 that trouble me greatly. His race isn't one of them.

So, in answer to your question: No, I do not think I'm being fed something.
But I'm sick and tired of black people making up ways I'm out to get them.




truckinslave -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 9:01:56 AM)

quote:

but any on the left side is ineffectual to the point of being almost completely inconsequential.


ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, BET, BBC, all but three or four of the major newspapers, liberal talk radio.... right. Inconsequential.
You got yours. We got ours (talk radio). The middle has Fox.




truckinslave -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 9:09:00 AM)

quote:

There are plenty of political stories to report about I'm sure, but I think that the recent upsurge on stories with an element of racial tension is a deliberate means to an end. Whether the stories are true or not, they are being selected because they fit a certain strategy.


Actually, that's an interesting perspective. Skewed, imo, but interesting. Consider an alternate, a hypothetical:

1. America elected a biracial President who self-identified as white.
2. America learned his pastor preached apartheid-style, white-centric Christianity.
3. The KKK showed up at a polling place or two and were not prosecuted.
4. Some minor white gummint official talked about how he dissed a black businessman.

Do ya think some of the news stories might have a racial angle??????? Or would that just be propaganda?




truckinslave -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 9:12:58 AM)

quote:

As such its an absolute disaster to have someone who might be thought of as one of these identifiable outsiders get ahead in any way - for it inevitably means that one of your own must have lost out.


No, not at all.
You are confusing conservatism/ capitalism (which believe in creating a bigger pie) with liberalism/ affirmative action (which believe in the government dividing the pie however they may wish, including on the basis of race).




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 2:09:42 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

There are plenty of political stories to report about I'm sure, but I think that the recent upsurge on stories with an element of racial tension is a deliberate means to an end. Whether the stories are true or not, they are being selected because they fit a certain strategy.


Actually, that's an interesting perspective. Skewed, imo, but interesting. Consider an alternate, a hypothetical:

1. America elected a biracial President who self-identified as white.
2. America learned his pastor preached apartheid-style, white-centric Christianity.
3. The KKK showed up at a polling place or two and were not prosecuted.
4. Some minor white gummint official talked about how he dissed a black businessman.

Do ya think some of the news stories might have a racial angle??????? Or would that just be propaganda?



Folks.....this is what the cool-aid does.

It creates an alternate reality.




Aylee -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 2:20:13 PM)

You all might enjoy this article:

http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/08/americas_first_black_president.html 

America's First Black President Seriously Damaging Race Relations

On March 18, 2008, Democrat presidential candidate Barack Obama gave a speech in Philadelphia about race relations in America. 

It was hailed by many as one of the most honest discussions on this subject since Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination four decades ago. 

As a result, it was believed his election would dramatically improve a condition that has plagued this country since its founding.

Despite the build up, when faced with racial issues, President Obama, rather than solving anything, has actually inflamed the situation.

After five such challenges in his brief presidency -- the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. affair, revelations about comments Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made about candidate Obama, allegations of racial epithets being hurled at black congressmen on Capitol Hill, the NAACP resolution condemning the Tea Party, and the recent Shirley Sherrod controversy -- America stands more racially divided than it's likely been in decades.

And the article continues. . .




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 2:26:18 PM)

Name what it is that Obama has done to enflame the situation?


That`s the douch bags doing that.






Aylee -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 2:36:54 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Name what it is that Obama has done to enflame the situation?


That`s the douch bags doing that.





Try reading the article.  I am not your kindergarten teacher, I do not need to be doing it for you.




Elisabella -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 3:05:32 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee
America's First Black President Seriously Damaging Race Relations


I wonder if race relations are actually being 'damaged' or if tension is just being brought to the surface.

If race relations were in good shape to begin with none of those things would have been so explosive.




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 3:31:33 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Name what it is that Obama has done to enflame the situation?


That`s the douch bags doing that.





Try reading the article.  I am not your kindergarten teacher, I do not need to be doing it for you.



Can`t think for yourself or answer for yourself?

Got it.




subrob1967 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 4:23:04 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


quote:

ORIGINAL: Aylee

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Name what it is that Obama has done to enflame the situation?


That`s the douch bags doing that.





Try reading the article.  I am not your kindergarten teacher, I do not need to be doing it for you.



Can`t think for yourself or answer for yourself?

Got it.


Olberrmaddow didn't tell him to read the article, because it wasn't posted on Huff&Fluffpo...Got it.

You really are a one trick pony, 59




Elisabella -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 4:30:46 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Can`t think for yourself or answer for yourself?

Got it.


Seriously, read the article. It lists quite a few things. Don't be fucking lazy.




NewOCDaddy -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 4:32:04 PM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray



There are plenty of political stories to report about I'm sure, but I think that the recent upsurge on stories with an element of racial tension is a deliberate means to an end. Whether the stories are true or not, they are being selected because they fit a certain strategy.


So you believe in something for which there is absolutely no evidence. 'Nuff said.




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 5:41:53 PM)

There was the false story that Michele Obama used the word "whitey".

Then the Obama as Arab/Muslim/terrorist/anti-Christ crap

Then the black panther fake story.

Beck Calling Obama a racist with a deep seated hatred of white people.

Then bratfart`s and fox`s race-baiting attack on Obama through a surrogate by the name of Sharrod.

Again I`ll ask,what has Obama done to inflame racial tension?

The only ones crawling through that particular sewer are the cons and rightist media.

This isn`t rocket science.These things didn`t appear from thin air.

It doesn`t take much to throw salt in America`s open sores and set people off.

Again I`ll ask,does anyone think all these images of angry/scary black people would be in the media if Hillary or McCain was president?












Aylee -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 5:46:15 PM)

I will re-post the quote for the frothing idiot.

After five such challenges in his brief presidency -- the Henry Louis Gates, Jr. affair, revelations about comments Sen. Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) made about candidate Obama, allegations of racial epithets being hurled at black congressmen on Capitol Hill, the NAACP resolution condemning the Tea Party, and the recent Shirley Sherrod controversy -- America stands more racially divided than it's likely been in decades.


If you would like more information about these, you will have to READ the article.  The author goes through each one.




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 5:50:19 PM)

We see you can read cut and paste....

But not much on dialog.


I read the piece when you posted it.

What`s your point?




FirmhandKY -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 8:12:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

We see you can read cut and paste....

But not much on dialog.


I read the piece when you posted it.

What`s your point?

Cut the Alinsky crap, owner.

She gave a reasonable discussion, and a link to an article that discusses the issue of the thread topic, and you are doing nothing more than attempting to get a rise out of her, so you can discredit her.

She's too crafty for you, my friend.

Firm




Owner59 -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 8:31:34 PM)

I see a link but no discussion.


How about you answer my questions.........which would be a discussion.








Aylee -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 8:49:47 PM)

Race relations are the worst they have been, since the 1960s. He (Obama) exploits racial divide, and encourages divisions among people. To think he was elected by a landslide, and at the time, polls indicated race was about to stop being an issue, then he started in with his "other" rhetoric, and in response to legitimate criticizim, encouraged "it's about race" as a way to divert legitimate opposition. Obama is immoral.




FirmhandKY -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 8:51:59 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: VioletGray

Ok, first let me say that I identify as a liberal, but I can respect conservative philosophy.  Smaller government (which to some means more freedom), the right to bear arms (which for some means not being totally subservient to the government),  Capitalism ( which for some means the right to prosper as much as their work and brilliance allows them to, without having to share it with people who didn't earn it),  I get that.  I mean no disrespect to the conservatism at its essence.  I think that we need both parties, as it will be the job of each party to tug us back toward the center should we slide too far in either direction.  I believe that it is the tension between these two that keeps the country running.

BUT---

As of late, have you noticed a theme as far as FOX news and conservative blogs to a lesser extent?  Here's some examples:

Reverend Wright.                     issue:         race.
"New" Black Panther party        issue:         race.
Shirley Sherrod                         issue:         race.

As well as targets Van Jones, a civil rights activist, and ACORN, an organization that helped mostly poor minorities until it was viciously lied about.

Do you think it's odd that all of these issues have arisen since the Obama presidency?  The "New Black Panther Party" has been around since the mid-nineties (and is NOT recognized as such by any of the REAL former black panthers.) Then you have this:

Rush Limbaugh:    "Obama's after reparations for blacks!"
Glenn Beck:         "Obama is a racist!"
Michelle Malkin:   " Obama is a racial opportunist!"  

As well as an entire chorus of birthers, racist picket sign holders, and people saying "Barack is a Kenyan Muslim Socialist/Marxist/Nazi who kills babies, kills them with the guns he confiscates from decent, hard-working 'mericans!"

So here's the question, and not just for conservatives: Do you feel like you're being fed something? Do you feel as if there is a deliberate effort by the right-wing media, through subtle implications and more overt means, to drive home the idea that the black people are out to get you? I don't want to make this post really, really long, but if you're not familiar with it, look up "southern strategy" on Wikipedia.  It seems to me that the southern strategy is being attempted on a national scale because for the first time in history, we have a president that they think it might work on.

You know why I hate reality shows? Because they insult my intelligence.  They want me to believe that every thing Snookie or Flavor Flav does just happened on its own, that none of the situations were written into the show, and they try to control my emotions through cheap editing tricks (especially contests, where they say "and the winner is..." and then prolong it with shots of the anxious contestants faces, for like 30 seconds with suspenseful music. I'm looking at YOU, Last Comic Standing!)

It's that same annoyance I feel with the right-wing media right now.  Are there liberals trying to push some sort of propaganda onto the public as well? I'm sure. But really who cares? If the liberal movement was a T-Rex, the propaganda section would be the arms. And BOTH those arms are Rachel Maddow, who is awesome, but she can't do it all by herself.

I guess my point is that, seriously, the conservative point of view I think has enough merit on its own without having to resort to these terrible tactics.  This is the same part of the Right that insists on the saying Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

VG,

A very well written post, I must admit.

I agree with some of your points, but, truthfully, I'm almost pass the point of caring any more.

We had a similar discussion several months ago (Could we kindly cut the nazi/communist crap?), where a liberal poster (Spinner of Tales - RIP) wanted to know why all of a sudden the right was using the NCFS terminology ... and couldn't we just stop, and discuss things like adults?.  NCFS was one of Arpig's contribution, meaning the Nazi/Communist/Fascist/Socialist terms of insult being slung around in the political discussion.

I'm pretty much in the same position on the use of the "racism" meme as I was in that thread about NCFS comments:  basically, it's been a freely used weapon from the left for so long, and now the right has been handed the perfect political opportunity to effectively sling it right back.

Boo-frigging-hoo.

In the thread I referenced above, the OP wanted to know "... can we stop with the boogie man, communist, nazi nonsense long enough to maybe discuss the issues? ".

The left leaning members of the forum initially turned it into a joke thread, and it wasn't until the 6th page that I decided to point out the fact that it was the left that was refusing to take it seriously.  For the next couple of pages, I had a reasonable discussion with a few posters, but the old lefty tactics came out again in force, and they demonstrated the very same childish, insulting, belittling behavior of which I pointed out that they were guilty .

That's what the left does

Some of my comments that are applicable to this thread:

I see no repentance on the left for their coarsing of the political discussion, nor for their Alinsky-ist tactics of destroying the messenger rather than engaging in honest debate. I see no indication of them making even the smallest efforts to actually take into account over half of the US population that doesn't live, eat, breath and sleep their particular philosophy ("I won" x 2). I see no real interest in them having an honest discussion ("Every crisis is an opportunity"). All I really see is outrage and distaste that "the little people" dare to disagree, and make that disagreement known.

Is everyone on the left guilty of perfidy, here on the CM forums? Nope.

Are all left-of-center politicians in the US guilty of perfidy? Again, nope.

But the fact is that in my opinion, and in a growing number on the right, that there is no way to reasonably return to kinder, gentler times, and that the grounds for discussion has permanently shifted, and it's not only unlikely that trying to tone down the rhetoric will do us a damn bit of good, but that if we do not adopt some of the left's tactics, then we are nothing more than sheep being lead to the slaughter, baaaaing, and bleating ineffectually.

And I hate that. It's not in my nature to believe that reasonable people can't be reasonable.

But with many of our current Democratic political leaders painting anyone or any organization which doesn't agree with them as the epitome of evil, do you not think that there would be a reaction? Do not liberals understand that when you marginalize a group, you create anger and resentment? That that anger and resentment can only be exacerbated by the rhetoric that they continue to use?

And when the left gets even the slightest taste of their own medicine, they go into hysteria and hyperventilation?

Why should we on the right give a shit what they think? Do they give a shit what we think? Nope.

So, all that being said ... I much prefer to engage in discussions without the animosity, and the use of NCFS terminology. It's inaccurate. It's deadening to the discussion, and it's mean spirited. I do not think it has any place on the CM forums, although it has been a common left-side talking point over the last 8 years at least.

But, in the public arena? I just don't know if I give a shit what the "bushitler" and "all conservatives are nazis" crowds on the left get smacked with. Ask me again in a few months, or a couple of years, and maybe I'll have lightened up a little, but I doubt it. Unless and until several major Democratic politicians publicly apologize and take their own party to task over their own methods of discourse, there is no repentance, and therefore there is no forgiveness in my heart.

So, bottom line, it's the intellectual and political left that has given the world "you're a racists!" attacks, race-baiting as a political technique, and which sees the boogyman of racism under every rock and nook and cranny (as long as it is to their political benefit).  Never forgiving (unless you voted the right way), and using it as a weapon to destroy their political opponents.  When it's not to their advantage?  "An unfortunate mistake".

This witch-hunt atmosphere is what has made "honestly talking about race" near impossible.  This leftist inspired political weapon has caused (and will cause) more anger, hurt, and destruction before it is finally played out, then most people can even envision, I think.

They have devalued the ability to work against actual racism, and increased racial hatred and animosity by unnecessarily "stirring up the racial pot".

The left gave us the recipe.  Now they can eat the damn meal.  And choke on it.

Firm




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875