VioletGray -> RE: The role of race in conservative media (8/1/2010 10:26:29 PM)
|
Um, wow, so much to get to. Some of it is worth responding to, some of it isn't (this means YOU, NewOCDaddy.) I'm not sure if I'll get to everything I want to respond to, but I'll try my best. Let's get started shall we? quote:
ORIGINAL: subrob1967 The Sherrod thing was the administration's fault, I know how you guys love to blame Fox & Breitbart, but neither has the power to fire a government employee, if they did, Obama would have been gone a year ago. I'm sorry, but liberals made this bed, now they have to lie in it. No, just the firing was the administration's fault. The public embarrassment, the character assassination, the damage to her credibility and her career Breitbart and Fox had a direct hand in. quote:
ORIGINAL: vincentML quote:
It seems to me that the southern strategy is being attempted on a national scale because for the first time in history, we have a president that they think it might work on. The southern strategy is no longer just about race and it is not confined to the southern states. It has morphed into an ethnic, class and culturally devisive election strategy. It is beer drinkers vs Eastern Elites. It is high school grads/dropouts vs University educated. It is small town Wasilla vs Manhatten. It was used quite effectively by Hillary Clinton in Ohio, Pennsylvania and West Virginia. The key is "he is not like us." From the Wiki article: In recent years, the term "Southern strategy" has been used in a more general sense, referring to the way in which political parties use cultural themes in election campaigns — primarily but not exclusively in the American South. In the past, politicians' highlighting of issues such as busing or states' rights appealed to white angst about integration. More recently, Republican politicians made appeals to "conservative values", and used cultural issues such as gay marriage, abortion, and religion to mobilize their base. Key words being "In recent years." Historically, "southern strategy" held a very specific meaning, and even Michael Steele spoke about it, and when he did he and everyone who heard it knew that he wasn't talking about rich vs. poor, man vs. woman, or Playstation vs. Xbox. quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: VioletGray Are there liberals trying to push some sort of propaganda onto the public as well? I'm sure. But really who cares? Ezra Klein JournoList Google is your friend. If I have to google them in the first place, then.. I'm sure you know the rest. quote:
ORIGINAL: thishereboi You say the left is ineffectual, yet I see people on the left who have bought into the latest bs that everyone on the right is racist. Now how is that any different that the idiots on the right who have bought into the latest be that everyone on the left is socialist? You're speaking in very general terms here. If I'm to consider your point of view, I'll need you to be more specific. quote:
ORIGINAL: truckinslave They didn't get any ink until they showed up at a polling place with clubs. That's why they're in the news, VG. They chose the timing. Same for Wright. He wasn't much of a story until one of his congregants wasn't leading presidential polls. As far as: But was "two weirdos, one nightstick" really worth all the coverage? The nightstick guy even got in trouble with their own organization. To put that in perspective, I don't feel like that nazi kid who was planning to shoot Obama got quite as much coverage on Fox. quote:
"As well as an entire chorus of birthers, racist picket sign holders, and people saying "Barack is a Kenyan Muslim Socialist/Marxist/Nazi who kills babies, kills them with the guns he confiscates from decent, hard-working 'mericans!" I've got nothing against good political hyperbole, so certainly I take no offense at the above. But tell me why it wasn't racist to show GWB as the Joker, but it is to portray 0bama0 that way? There is a huge segment of our society that calls ALL criticism of Ear Leader racist... We all, I hope, know racism when we see it, but this made-up indignation has to stop. Or not. It's losing effectiveness; people are becoming decensitized. I don't think this is hyperbole. Rush says these things like they are absolutely true. And while Glenn Beck does use hyperbole, just as often he says outrageous things that aren't. And I'm sure there are some people who process all criticism of Obama as racist, but there are also people who get into arguments with their imaginary dragons. As for the rest of them, they argue that the level of rage and vitriol, not the criticism itself, has racial elements. quote:
There are an awful lot of things about 0bama0 that trouble me greatly. His race isn't one of them. So, in answer to your question: No, I do not think I'm being fed something. But I'm sick and tired of black people making up ways I'm out to get them. Now the first sentence there was encouraging. The second sentence? Just a sweeping generalization of... you know what? nevermind. ::sigh:: quote:
but any on the left side is ineffectual to the point of being almost completely inconsequential. ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, BET, BBC, all but three or four of the major newspapers, liberal talk radio.... right. Inconsequential. You got yours. We got ours (talk radio). The middle has Fox. Hmm.. Look at the ratings, and tell me how they stand up against Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly? Hey wait-- The MIDDLE? Seriously? I'm not sure if this was just to provoke a response or not, but if you truly in your heart believe that then this dialog between us is pointless. I'm sorry :-/ In closing, I think that Rachel Maddow had a good point in her debate with Joe Scarborough when she said that some things because issues when political opponents MAKE them issues. Which did you hear more about from Fox News? The initial Acorn Scandal, or the fact that every investigation into the company has come out in their favor? The initial Sherrod Scandal (Fox ran that into the ground pretty hard) or the fact that the tapes were edited.? Reverend Wright or Charles Keating? Also, it isn't just that Fox runs the stories. They run them with force, showing the same things, same videos over and over, I feel like they try to cram this stuff down our throats. There was a guy from The Young Turks who spliced together all the coverage of the Sherrod Story on Fox News, how many times she was talked about on different shows by different people within a 24 hour period. The results were staggering (to be fair, TYT is a liberal show, but this video kinda speaks for itself.) Anyway, it's late and I'm passing out from a long day of nerd convention-going, so I must go now, but I look forward to the replies! :-)
|
|
|
|