|
dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:02:07 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: BoiJen
. You seem to be confused that just because a small group of folks wants something on a privately owned site, that the owners should them obliged to meet your demands.
Yes, generally speaking a service should tend to the needs of it's users. I missed the part where this is unreasonable. Male submissives who don't want to pay money to sex workers to fullfill their fantasy is not a small group of users, and even if it were, so what? We've got search criteria for transexuals here. What percentage of the community do you suppose they represent?
quote:
This isn't the case. You would need drastic numbers of folks writing CM daily to get the changes you want. I've stated all of this before.
Based on what information?
quote:
When pointing out the flaws in your plan about a flagging or rating system, you simply ignore the comments. Hell, you've ignored that people are less rational when it comes to sex and relationships and personal feelings than business transactions this whole time.
I ignore comments that have no foundation. If I indulged everyone who did not provide useful counter-arguments it would not be productive. I've provided SUBSTANTIATED facts. People say "It won't work because of this, it won't work because of that" and then do NOTHING to substantiate those viewpoints, and think that they've made intelligent counter-points.
quote:
But thank you for answering...no, you haven't been following along. That or you have some sever early onset dementia.
boi
Lets look at this thread for what it really is: Something that started out being about exploring an idea, and ended up being about proving who's right, and who's wrong.
You've made personal attacks on me 3 or 4 times now, and every time I call you out on it you deny it. This is obviously about more than just what's best for CM and it's users to you if you're going to sit here and insult me. If you're going to come out and attack me and not the subject at hand, at least have the cahonies to NOT hide behind a thinly veiled intellectual guise.
|
|
|
|
