RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money?

RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

SorceressJ -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:10:33 PM)
Often silly, never insecure. Oh "Fejjj"? Ice cream cones are on another thread, sorry.. [;)]

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:10:58 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer Yes, generally people become more agitated the more abuse they're forced to take. 'abuse'?! Fella, this is the internet. Abuse is being punched, abuse is being shouted at, abuse is having someone right up in your face and being frightened of them. Somebody on a kink site called you a weiner. Get some perspective, because you are behaving like a drama queen. <edited because prepositions are a vital part of the English language and my failure to notice that I had missed one out irritated me, probably slightly beyond reason>

Fejjjj -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:11:00 PM)
But then how will I coyly empty your wallet? silly man. giggles~

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:11:05 PM)
Seriously. You're all great, contributing a lot to the debate.

Aileen1968 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:11:25 PM)
Speaking of sock puppets...I made these with my kids the last few days. We made the bunnies and the owls.

Tantriqu -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:11:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: SorceressJ quote: ORIGINAL: Tantriqu LOVES this response. Did you get the one from the guy that wants you to come to Egypt, marry him, and herd his goats? Srsly. I've gotten that one twice.. Thanks! [sm=highfive.gif] Oh, THOSE form letters! Sorry, I thought we were being asked about flamers. Oh, yeah, plenty of the 87-pound Ghananian [sp?] /Nigerian/Middle Eastern/Israeli/Indian guys with Caucasian profile pics, begging for dommeliness from the masculine comforts of their theocracies, and then again several months later, still weighin' 87 lbs. The annoyance factor from them is so relatively low, though, I haven't been keeping track.

laurell3 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:13:38 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen TADA! http://stagevu.com/video/mzgyewvruodv seriously can I use this to change the background? I'm technologically inept can you read your mail please? I would LOVE it if I could not have migraines from the white on black.

dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:14:01 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer Yes, generally people become more agitated the more abuse they're forced to take. 'abuse'?! Fella, this is the internet. Abuse is being punched, abuse is being shouted, abuse is having someone right up in your face and being frightened of them. Somebody on a kink site called you a weiner. Get some perspective, because you are behaving like a drama queen. From Dictionary.com 3. to speak insultingly, harshly, and unjustly to or about; revile; malign. The fact that I need to define abusive behavior to people ... It's just mind-boggling.

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:14:05 PM)
Evidently, "sock puppets" (whatever those are) are of higher intelligence than you. They can stay on topic. You lack that quality. That's okay. You reinforce me.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:14:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer These people are ALREADY "listed" in this category if, in their profile, they mention they're a pro domme, as 99.9% of them do. We want them categorized as such because we have no interest in them, just as you may have no interest in a gay woman. What I'm asking is why pro-domme should be a special category to filter by. I have no interest in unemployed men. Should there be a "broke ass" category to filter by? I have no interest in men who can't spell. Should there be a "illiterate" category to filter by? More on topic - money is a kink for some people. I think if there was a way to filter by ALL kinks it would be workable (then I would be able to report anyone who messaged me outside of my search parameters as a "scammer" - oh hey I kinda like this idea) but my main issue is that you're singling out the ONE group that YOU are not interested in as though you're completely oblivious to the fact that EVERYONE on this site gets message from people that THEY are not interested in.

Fejjjj -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:15:46 PM)
Honey, he is never going to get it. so sad......

Aileen1968 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:16:27 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lilboycaught Evidently, "sock puppets" (whatever those are) are of higher intelligence than you. They can stay on topic. You lack that quality. That's okay. You reinforce me. You're just jealous because you can't sew.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:17:30 PM)
OMG THE CUTENESS OF THE LITTLE FEMALE ANTEATER <3

BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:17:52 PM)
Sexing ...er...Sewing is hot.

Aileen1968 -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:18:56 PM)
Um Fejjjj? There's a typo in your sig line. Hahahahaha. too

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:19:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer These people are ALREADY "listed" in this category if, in their profile, they mention they're a pro domme, as 99.9% of them do. We want them categorized as such because we have no interest in them, just as you may have no interest in a gay woman. What I'm asking is why pro-domme should be a special category to filter by. I have no interest in unemployed men. Should there be a "broke ass" category to filter by? I have no interest in men who can't spell. Should there be a "illiterate" category to filter by? More on topic - money is a kink for some people. I think if there was a way to filter by ALL kinks it would be workable (then I would be able to report anyone who messaged me outside of my search parameters as a "scammer" - oh hey I kinda like this idea) but my main issue is that you're singling out the ONE group that YOU are not interested in as though you're completely oblivious to the fact that EVERYONE on this site gets message from people that THEY are not interested in. It's not a matter of who is contacting us sub males. Very few women contact us -- they wait for contacts. It's a matter of browsing profiles and knowing we have no interest in 75 percent of them because they want domination = money.

VaguelyCurious -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:19:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer quote: ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer Yes, generally people become more agitated the more abuse they're forced to take. 'abuse'?! Fella, this is the internet. Abuse is being punched, abuse is being shouted, abuse is having someone right up in your face and being frightened of them. Somebody on a kink site called you a weiner. Get some perspective, because you are behaving like a drama queen. From Dictionary.com 3. to speak insultingly, harshly, and unjustly to or about; revile; malign. The fact that I need to define abusive behavior to people ... It's just mind-boggling. Well clearly we're seeing the comments made on this thread as coming from a whole different order of magnitude; if you consider 'we have a weiner!' to be a seriously malignant, harsh, insulting, unjust, reviling statement then you are vastly more sensitive than I am, which would, again, mean you were posting like a drama queen. Plus, 'mind-boggling'? Not really proving me wrong here...

Jeffff -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:21:21 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 Um Fejjjj? There's a typo in your sig line. Hahahahaha. too LOL.... damn! I am sure she will fix it later. She seems pretty cool to me.

BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:21:48 PM)
Am I the only one who feels completely justified in the posts directed toward dbloomer? I'd say that whole "unjust" thing doesn't fit here.

BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 4:22:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 Um Fejjjj? There's a typo in your sig line. Hahahahaha. too LOL.... damn! I am sure she will fix it later. She seems pretty cool to me. HAHAHAHA!!!!! Just realized you were signed into the wrong puppet lol

Page: << < prev 13 14 [15] 16 17 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875