RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money?

RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

Message

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:00:20 PM)
lol edited because the mods are getting all DRACONIAN again lmfaoooooooooooooooo suffice it to say it was mean.

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:02:11 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: lilboycaught Well, silly girls can't stay on topic. Because they can't argue their side. Hahahahaha go fuck your sister. Like I said, silly girls can't stay on topic. I find you, and Lockit, really sadly desperate to "win" and you don't address my points. Decidedly hickish.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:04:55 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lilboycaught Like I said, silly girls can't stay on topic. I find you, and Lockit, really sadly desperate to "win" and you don't address my points. Decidedly hickish. When I get desperate to win I'll start making sock puppets. Edited to remove personal insult

Lockit -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:06:00 PM)
I do not need to win. I know how to be wrong. But... I am Lockit... I am not posing as two other people in an argument. So just call me the one who called out the cheater in a fair fight that went south.

BoiJen -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:06:43 PM)
Says the puppet who wasn't making any arguments. The other puppet was.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:09:28 PM)
Hey check it out we're dominating him FOR FREE I guess this thread worked out after all.

Lockit -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:10:41 PM)
I am really uncomfortable with someone using a thread I pulled up as proof of a sock puppet to find more names to call someone when a mod has said to stop.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:12:27 PM)
Fair enough. If this thread doesn't get deleted I'll stick to expressions of chaotic glee and leave the sniping for when he inevitably sends something mean to my inbox.

dbloomer -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:14:06 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote: ORIGINAL: Lockit I knew if I looked hard enough, I would prove that udaboss and lilboycaught were the same person even if they did hide their profiles. I think there is another nick on this thread, but haven't looked for that yet. You can hide a profile... but not the posts! Funny, they show up and support one another on the same days. I have also seen all three from around where I live. And the old picture of problemchild looks very much like udaboss, but they are now hidden. So here we have a thread started by udaboss http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2774345 The thread I will never forget. lilboylost shows up here http://www.collarchat.com/fb.asp?m=2774613 AHAHAHAHA OWNED I'm betting dbloomer is one of them too because he called this thread "his thread" even though the OP was under a different name. It's my thread because I'm the only one providing it with any kind of direction anymore. If this thread has proven anything, it's that I don't care what you think. I would never stoop to creating secret accounts, and I'm not aligned with those two outside of this thread. This time I really am done with the thread.

Elisabella -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:15:52 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: dbloomer It's my thread because I'm the only one providing it with any kind of direction anymore. If this thread has proven anything, it's that I don't care what you think: I would never stoop to creating secret accounts, and I'm not aligned with those two outside of this thread. It's interesting to see the lengths you will go to to try and do what's referred to as a "character assassination". I'll take your word for it because I don't really care enough to go hunt out possible lulz. I'm lazy like that.

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:26:26 PM)
I doubt this will ever be on topic. I finally figured out what people mean by "sock puppet." Uh, no, not a sock puppet for anyone and even if I was, it wouldn't matter. Substance is substance. I still haven't heard a substantive argument for NOT having a seperate category for pro dommes. And at this point, 350-some posts into the thread, it's unlikely I will.

LadyPact -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:29:29 PM)
I love this "it's the right thing to do" bit. The righteous indignation thing just isn't working here. To this point, every woman on this thread has said it's a bad idea. To this point every male Dominant has said it's a bad idea. To this point, CM has never felt the need to implement this idea. Out of over 2,000 hits, only three or four (depending if some count as the same person) have said it's a good idea. That's a pretty low percentage in My book. ETA - I'll wait for those who are in support of this idea to claim how many people are writing them on the other side to say how great this idea would be.

lilboycaught -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:34:19 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: LadyPact I love this "it's the right thing to do" bit. The righteous indignation thing just isn't working here. To this point, every woman on this thread has said it's a bad idea. To this point every male Dominant has said it's a bad idea. To this point, CM has never felt the need to implement this idea. Out of over 2,000 hits, only three or four (depending if some count as the same person) have said it's a good idea. That's a pretty low percentage in My book. That' No that's not true. Most of the females have made condescending and insulting remarks, and made, frankly, ridiculous objections if they even addressed the subject. nearly ALL of the objections have come from the the lame "but-people-could-lie" nonsense. That has been addressed. People would lie. That is not a valid reason not to do it because they can lie on every other aspect of their profile as well. Besides, YOU wouldn't like it because you do it for money. BTW< I utterly couldn't care less what a couple of male dominants said. This isn't about them.

Lockit -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 5:39:37 PM)
LadyPact doesn't do it for money.

ModTwentyOne -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 10:20:47 PM)
Please continue to follow this little gem in Random Stupidity. A handy piece of advice to no one in particular: Whenever someone chooses to resort to Multiple Personality Posting Disorder to support their idea, they should really take a step back, take a deep breath, and rethink things. Thank you. Moderator TwentyOne

EbonyWood -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 10:32:07 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Aileen1968 quote: ORIGINAL: Jeffff Like many people, he has gotten caught up in the rigamoral. Once you get ging it can be hard to stop. Why don't we use rigamoral anymore? Or ging? This is why I like you so much , A2M.

LadyPact -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 11:30:18 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: lilboycaught No that's not true. Most of the females have made condescending and insulting remarks, and made, frankly, ridiculous objections if they even addressed the subject. nearly ALL of the objections have come from the the lame "but-people-could-lie" nonsense. That has been addressed. People would lie. That is not a valid reason not to do it because they can lie on every other aspect of their profile as well. Besides, YOU wouldn't like it because you do it for money. BTW< I utterly couldn't care less what a couple of male dominants said. This isn't about them. And that's exactly why the idea wouldn't work. Right there. I am, in fact, a lifestyle Domme. I state this specifically in My profile. In addition, I state the words exactly, "I am not a pro domme" within the text of My profile. Every person who has met Me on this site, can verify that I am not a pro. I have, at minimum, at least a hundred posts that have stated repeatedly why being a pro is not for Me. Yet, here you are claiming that I am a pro. What evidence did you base your theory on? None. This is exactly how the idea would be abused.

realwhiteknight -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/3/2010 11:58:36 PM)
ok so...just getting to this thread, and I'm really curious...from what I've seen, alot of these 'pro dommes' fake profiles are pretty obviously fake. I've been having trouble trying to understanding why so many people looking for 'something real' are getting suckered in by profiled which are clearly fake- i.e. have pictures of 21yo models and large, bold print profile statements detailing all sorts of sexual stuff and just being really open to all sorts of situations in their checklist... I mean, is it really not as obvious as it seems to be to root out the fake ones? Are you guys only clicking on the profiles of women who appear to be in their early 20s and models? May this not be the problem? Maybe., if searching for something 'real', seoarch for something real- i.e. awoman who appears real, and not an intellectually defunct, oversexed perfect 10? [8\|] Am I missing something here? And is that blunt enough for you guys complaining?

realwhiteknight -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/4/2010 12:17:34 AM)
quote: What I'm asking is why pro-domme should be a special category to filter by. I have no interest in unemployed men. Should there be a "broke ass" category to filter by? I have no interest in men who can't spell. Should there be a "illiterate" category to filter by? More on topic - money is a kink for some people. I think if there was a way to filter by ALL kinks it would be workable (then I would be able to report anyone who messaged me outside of my search parameters as a "scammer" - oh hey I kinda like this idea) but my main issue is that you're singling out the ONE group that YOU are not interested in as though you're completely oblivious to the fact that EVERYONE on this site gets message from people that THEY are not interested in. [:D][:D][:D][:D][:D] Exactly. I'd like to add, 'desperate dirtbag trying to get laid by whoever they can while pretending to be into bdsm' filter and a 'I'm suuuuuuch a great guy that I wrote a long, long, LONG email detailing the inner workings of my soul and life's tragic story to you which is actually a cut and paste sent to 2000 women a day' filter and don't forget, definitely a 'he's going to play games with you and send you 20 thousand weird little emails before sending you a photo even if you have pics posted right on your profile' filter and the lovely as always 'What's your messenger name so we can chat? despite the fact that his profile is hidden and you may not want him to harass you every time you check your yahoo email' filter My personal favorite, though, I think is the 'I'm married but pretending I'm not' filter, or even the 'I never read your profile but I'm going to ask you for disgusting things you may or may not want to hear from a stranger' filter. My last one is, the 'I'm kind of just dumb, and like to send insulting emails to a woman for using big words I'm not familiar with n her profile because it threatens my ego' filter. Oh, I could really go on.. I'd really like to put them all on automatic block. Luckily, I recently found a way to do just that via my profile. It works! [;)]

realwhiteknight -> RE: Couldn't CM Have a Category for Dommes Who Aren't After Money? (8/4/2010 12:30:36 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Tantriqu quote: ORIGINAL: BoiJen 1. All the Dommes reading, if you've gotten at least one nasty message from a polite "No, thank you", please say so. 2. If it's happened more than once, please say so. 3. If you've gotten the nasty stuff from one profile, said "no thank you" and then two months later gotten the same form letter AGAIN, please say so. boi 1. Hella yes, dozens of different ones, yet each with uniquely detailed threats of prolonged physical torture, sexual and other mutilation, forced pregnancy/prostitution/rape/sodomy, and death. Christ, put them all together, and you've got a Margaret Atwood novel! So, as someone mentioned above, I've stopped giving polite 'no, thanks', and just block and delete unless the message is from a male sub. Life's too short to read sociopathic ravings and /or unsolicited Aspbergeric flames from comp-sci types poisoned by vanilla-porn-fuelled impossiblities. 2. Hella yes, and also as someone mentioned above, frequently hidden under a new profile. Male switches, doms and female subs posting 'on behalf of their dom' are the foulest-mouthed. Ai yai yai. Dommes just tend to be verbal bullies, rather than detailing physical threats. 3. Yes to more contact months later under different profiles, no to a form letter. hahahah [:D] yes yes yes! I'm a female sub, it's still true.

Page: << < prev 16 17 [18] 19 20 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875