Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 14th amendment debate


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 14th amendment debate Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:53:23 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
If you are born on this soil, you are American, unless you renounce your citizenship or your parents do it for you. Part of what we hold as an American value is that we are united by the fact that if you are born here, you are one of us. We have very little else we share in common other than we can become naturalized or citizen by birth. We are not united by a language, an ethnicity, or a religion. We are united by the idea of "belonging". If we start stripping away what "belonging" means, we start pulling at the threads of what being American means

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:56:03 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

It seems plain to me that there may be more than one reason for illegal aliens to have their children in the US. One reason I believe is to supplement their incomes with benefits such as food stamps... housing programs…education and other welfare benefits.

They can and do receive these benefits because of the citizenship of their children.


I suppose some might, if they're dumb enough and/or desperate enough. But they'd have to be pretty stupid, because having children for the sake of collecting public assistance is seldom better than a break-even proposition to begin with - I mean, it costs money to feed and clothe the kids, you know. When you consider that the minute they apply for the assistance, the state is required by law to report them to immigration authorities, I doubt very many of them are going to considerate it a shrewd business decision.

_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:57:09 AM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

If you are born on this soil, you are American, unless you renounce your citizenship or your parents do it for you. Part of what we hold as an American value is that we are united by the fact that if you are born here, you are one of us. We have very little else we share in common other than we can become naturalized or citizen by birth. We are not united by a language, an ethnicity, or a religion. We are united by the idea of "belonging". If we start stripping away what "belonging" means, we start pulling at the threads of what being American means


This

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to juliaoceania)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:07:05 AM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
Yeah but it's not saying exactly which benefits - I've not seen any documentation that the parents would be eligible for the same welfare benefits as a citizen.  The benefits are for the children.

Now, since this is turning to costs to states... what are people willing to pay to stop any payments any illegals, any employment of illegals, and absolute closure of the borders?

The most vociferous supporters for stopping illegal immigration, the hiring of illegal immigrants, and prevention of any benefit at all paid to illegal immigrants tend to be the same ones who hate our deficit spending (it would be a heinous cost to close the borders), decry "large government" (it would take a heinously large expansion of ICE, DoHS, or the military), want free markets or "pure capitalism" , and at the same time want cheap food and services.  Like cheap landscaping, drywalling, etc. in Calfornia for instance.  Cheap meat from packinghouses, and cheap fruits/veggies.  I've seen very few posters here actually say that they were willing to pony up for these costs.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:09:22 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
You forget what their lives are like outside the US...otherwise why come here. You think because they are coming here illegally to work they will decide not to have children... especially when they can receive benefits here for their children they can't get at home.

I guess we think differently.

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:15:33 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: juliaoceania

If you are born on this soil, you are American, unless you renounce your citizenship or your parents do it for you. Part of what we hold as an American value is that we are united by the fact that if you are born here, you are one of us. We have very little else we share in ommon other than we can become naturalized or citizen by birth. We are not united by a language, an ethnicity, or a religion. We are united by the idea of "belonging". If we start stripping away what "belonging" means, we start pulling at the threads of what being American means


This
This was worth more than a few ....yep,that should about cover it.

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:22:46 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
Section 411(d) of PRWORA permits States to expand alien eligibility
by providing State or local public benefits to illegal aliens. But this
may occur only if the State enacts a law after August 22, 1996, that
affirmatively provides that illegal aliens are eligible to receive (all
or particular
) State or local public benefits.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/law-reg/finalrule/tanfru_2.htm

I dont believe Butch indicated the parents were ever eligible, but stated they got it through their legally born children. Note the above. TANF can be made available to illegal aliens per their final ruling;

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:26:03 AM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

You forget what their lives are like outside the US...otherwise why come here. You think because they are coming here illegally to work they will decide not to have children... especially when they can receive benefits here for their children they can't get at home.

I guess we think differently.


Yes - but living here means it costs them a lot more to raise the children than it would in Mexico or wherever. They're not collecting welfare here and raising the kids in Guadalajara. Conservative myths to the contrary, having children in order to collect public assistance is not a profitable venture, for illegal immigrants or legal residents. And a lot less so for illegals, because they get less than a legal resident would, and they're subject to deportation as soon as they apply.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:31:53 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
OK...they stay home...poor lifestyle...poor healthcare for their children...poor schools...poor housing…OR... They have their children in the US... Better jobs...better healthcare...better schools...better housing and utilities…welfare to offset costs.

What decision would you make?

Butch

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:31:59 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
If TANF allows for illegal aliens to get benefits, why would they be reported?

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:35:16 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
Point 1:

I have a few conservative minded friends. They would like an Amendment, that would modify the 14th, to a conservative (read: racist) view point. I counter it with the following:

"Ok, you can have your reinterpetation of the 14th, but, agree, liberals can reinterpet the 2nd Amendment the way they want."

I have found, not a single conservative wants to change the 14th after that. Or just substitue, '2nd' for '10th'.

Point 2:

I once put a stone on the table, that we were all gathered around, and said:

"If you have commited a crime, that you have not been fully prosecuted and paid in jail or fine, then, by all means; pick up the stone and cast it at an illegal immigrant".

Everyday, I see people speeding down the roads of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (liberal state), and New Hampshire (mostly conservative state). If the arguement, that we should (according to conservatives, again), deport, every illegal. Then shouldn't we also be stopping EVERY speeder, and charging them to the full extent of the law, regardless of the situation? And that penalty should be the maximine jail/fine? And when I say, speeding, I mean, 0.1 mph OVER, the speed limit (because conservatives seem to have embraced, draconiam politics). If the posted speed limit is 55 mph, and your traveling, 56 mph, your breaking the law. And since you were only traveiling, 56 mph, your given the same punishment as someone doing 130 mps. Does that sound sane to any of you conservatives?

That literally is the viewpoint (metaphorically), that conservatives hold towards 'illegal immigration'.

Point 3:

quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyEllen
Its difficult politically to argue that the child of an illegal immigrant should have the right to run for President whilst someone like Schwarzenegger who has made a significant contribution to the US should not have that right.


It is not difficult politically. The only difficulty, is (at the moment), conservatives in the USA, trying to tie the actions of the kid's parents, to the kid. If someone is born in the United States of America, as defined under the US Constitution, they can run for the Office of the President. So the kid's parents were illegal immigrants, so what. If that kid does a good job, as president, I believe most people (except the racists), will easily over look the history.

Point 4:
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
I am thinking out loud with no statistics but I wonder if the real idea in having a baby in the US is not for citizenship but welfare benefits?


Study after study, ranging from independant non-profits, to even the University of New Mexico, have found that the suspected population of illegal immigrants, contribute more to the US economy, then they take out. In New Mexico alone (the study for UNM was published, 2007), the state gained $200 million over, what the illegal immigrants took from it. At a federal level, according to the Congressinal Budget Office (cbo.gov), the estimate amount of revenue from illegal immigrants paying taxes to the USA (or the states themselves), is to be $36 billion/year. Not bad for a the grand majority making LESS then the federal minimal wage of $7.25/hour. Oh, an yes, they to pay alot of the taxes, Americans do. Just consider the following idea:

A illegal immigrant from Peru (who hopped the border from Mexico to Texas), walks in to a convience store. He puts down a loaf of bread, six pack of beer, a sugary treat for his two kids, two packs of cigarettes, and $15 dollars for the heap of a truck he has outside. He looks at the clerk as the person is ringing up the order, "I'd like to get the illegal immigrant tax discount. I dont want to pay your taxes, cus I'm not here legally". Do you REALLY think the clerk will do so, and remove the state/federal taxes?

For example, the Commonwealth of Massachusett's budget is based on tax and fee revenue. The amount it receives from personal income taxes of individuals and corporations is about $8 Billion of the $27.4 Billion. The majority, comes from the Sales Tax at about $17 Billion. So, those illegal immigrants in MA, do not pay state taxes, but pay the sales taxe, plus other fees and taxes. In addition, the IRS has a volunatary federal income tax program. The illegal immigrants, have been paying this tax, and in large numbers each year. Why do they do this? Would conservatives in the USA, pay taxes if they didn't have to?

(disclaimer: the actual amount of the MA budget may have changed recently for 2011, but the figures are still more or less correct)

Point 5:
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
after you posted I ran a search on children of illegal aliens and welfare benefits... you should do the same. I would list links but there are so many I think you can look for yourself.


After you posted, I ran a search on people who think President Obama isn't an American. You should do the same. I would list the links, but there are so many, I think you can look for yourself.

Yes, If I were to look, for 'children of illegal aliens and welfare benefits', I'm sure 99% of them, would be from individuals with a serious, racists bias on the subject. The small percentage (less then 1%), would be from legitimate sources, and would tell a much different picture, then the other 99%. Just like the amount of 'information' that the Mr. Obama, isn't a citizen of the USA, but of another country.

Point 6:
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub
I am talking about the children not the parents...search again... it cost California $64,000,000 in 2009 for children born in the US of illegal aliens. That is a pretty good amount on a state that is bankrupt.


How much did it cost California in 2009, to pay for children born in the US of U.S. citizens? I'm sure its a pretty good amount...MORE...then the illegal immigrants. That would have, according to logic, a much BIGGER impact on a state with regards to bankruptcy.

And could you itemize this $64,000 break down, of the child in Calinfornia, or give an legimate and trustworthy source? Like a state or federal website?




< Message edited by joether -- 8/7/2010 11:38:30 AM >

(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:36:09 AM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Could we have a show of hands.....who amongst the congregation (popey you are excluded,your views on the subject at hand are well known)actually see this whole "anchor baby" as anything other than a diversion?
Who amongst us actually believes that these babies are a threat to the health of the Republic?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:38:58 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
I never claimed they were a threat. I merely pointed out that the belief that illegal parents cannot get benefits is incorrect according to the agency who gives out those benefits.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:41:38 AM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Joe don't take my posts as being against people just trying to make a living on this earth... I'm not... Just imagine how much more they would contribute to the US economy if they did not abuse welfare through the 14th amendment.

I am all for people legally entering the US to make a living AND to become citizens if they wish. But I am not for people to illegally enter this country with no intent on becoming citizens and taking advantage of our welfare system.

Butch

< Message edited by kdsub -- 8/7/2010 11:50:05 AM >


_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:48:24 AM   
joether


Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u
Could we have a show of hands.....who amongst the congregation (popey you are excluded,your views on the subject at hand are well known)actually see this whole "anchor baby" as anything other than a diversion?
Who amongst us actually believes that these babies are a threat to the health of the Republic?


Oh, you dont understand the REAL reason, conservatives are so 'up in arms' about illegal immigrants, do you?

According to conservatives (and take this with a grain of sand against the Sahara Desert...), by 2050, the number of Hispanics, or close to Hispanic decent, in the United States of America, will over take the 'white' population, and become the majority race. Sounds like the sort of thing the racists in the Tea Party would be alarmed at right? Get's better...

According to the Congressinal Budget Office (cbo.gov), the Goverment Accounting Office (gao.gov) and other federal/state institutions, its predicted based on statistics, that for every five immigrants that enter the USA, from 2000-2050, 4 out of 5, will register as......(drum roll).....Democrat! Not surprisingly, conservative talk radio, Fox News, and all the other idiot conservatives (i.e. Sarah Palin, Sean Hannity, Glenn Beck, etc), keep adding fuel on to the fire. They want to curb immigration, not for the good of the USA, but for the good of the Republican Party. It is actually listed in many of the conspiracy theory websites (I'm sure others could present examples), that conservatives frequent.

The real truth, is more likely, all together different. But when has truth and fact, stopped conservatives from believing total lies?

< Message edited by joether -- 8/7/2010 11:49:36 AM >

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 11:59:27 AM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Could we have a show of hands.....who amongst the congregation (popey you are excluded,your views on the subject at hand are well known)actually see this whole "anchor baby" as anything other than a diversion?
Who amongst us actually believes that these babies are a threat to the health of the Republic?


My sister adopted an infant whose mother came here illegally. She did not have her baby here to anchor her, she had it here to give it to people with means and a strong marriage to support her child, and then she went back home.

Here is something that many people do not understand about leaving a homeland. It isn't easy. Mexicans have this bias on their side of the border, you cannot be truly be Mexican unless you are born there. It does not matter if your parents are Mexican and you move back as an infant, if you are not born in Mexico they label you not one of them.

This has a strong impact culturally AGAINST people seeking American citizenship for their children. They know that if they have their kids here, their offspring are forever alienated on some level from other Mexicans. Now, do some people have anchor babies? Well, I know they do, but I also know there are not legions of pregnant women fighting their way across the border so they can have their babies in a strange country without familial support, knowing they will be condemning their children to never truly being seen as a member of the society that their mother belongs to...




_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 12:04:33 PM   
mari49x


Posts: 16
Joined: 10/16/2004
Status: offline
The reason those illegal immigrants would vote Democrat is ............. they know the stupid Democrat party will give them everything they ever wanted without ever having to work for it .... AND ... be able to vote.    What other country would let you do that?   You don't see them trying to get things from their own country!    But ... for the ones who are here illegally, and work illegally .... I know for a fact (personally) .... some, if not a lot .... plan on making money here and then sending it back to the rest of their relatives in Mexico.   We are just one big fat MONEY COW to these people.   GET REAL ... of course the common sense Republicans do not want them here illegally.   Are you an idiot?

I think Winston Churchill said:    If you're in your 20's and a Republican, you have no heart.   If you're in your 50's and a Democrat, you have no SENSE!!!

I have common sense and am not going to give up MY HARD EARNED MONEY to some illegal who never did an ounce of work for it!

< Message edited by mari49x -- 8/7/2010 12:06:41 PM >

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 12:09:38 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline
quote:

I think Winston Churchill said:    If you're in your 20's and a Republican, you have no heart.   If you're in your 50's and a Democrat, you have no SENSE!!!


At least liberals know how to quote....and btw, Winston Churchill was English, which may have clued you in about the entire republican and democrat thing in your quote being incorrect...

quote:

Winston Churchill


“If you're not a liberal at twenty you have no heart, if you're not a conservative at forty you have no brain.”


_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to mari49x)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 12:11:05 PM   
jlf1961


Posts: 14840
Joined: 6/10/2008
From: Somewhere Texas
Status: offline
May I point out that the last time there was an amnesty given to illegal aliens it was a REPUBLICAN congress and REPUBLICAN president that did it?

John McCain, the poster boy of the Republican party voted for the damn thing. So back up and regroup.

_____________________________

Boy, it sure would be nice if we had some grenades, don't you think?

You cannot control who comes into your life, but you can control which airlock you throw them out of.

Paranoid Paramilitary Gun Loving Conspiracy Theorist AND EQUAL OPPORTUNI

(in reply to mari49x)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 12:23:33 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: mari49x
I think Winston Churchill said:    If you're in your 20's and a Republican, you have no heart.   If you're in your 50's and a Democrat, you have no SENSE!!!


Why on Earth would Winston Churchill say that? They don't have Republicans or Democrats in Great Britain.


quote:

ORIGINAL: mari49x
I have common sense and am not going to give up MY HARD EARNED MONEY to some illegal who never did an ounce of work for it!


Good. Don't. Who asked you to? And since nobody did, what does any of that have to do with what the rest of us are talking about?

< Message edited by ThatDamnedPanda -- 8/7/2010 12:34:49 PM >


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to mari49x)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 14th amendment debate Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109