Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: 14th amendment debate


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 14th amendment debate Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 4:54:45 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

Mike you are such a tart
Beautiful,an acerbic personality...and I know she can swing a whip...why is my heart beating so fast?

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 4:58:28 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Conservative myths to the contrary, having children in order to collect public assistance is not a profitable venture, for illegal immigrants or legal residents.


I've never heard conservatives say having children on welfare was "profitable".
I have heard various people say that women drawing AFDC and other welfare rarely stop after the first one. Which is what they call, you know a fact. Rather than madeup BS like, you know, profitable.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:00:12 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
Me.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:02:06 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
"I have heard various people say that women drawing AFDC and other welfare rarely stop after the first one."



Well.........that settles it. Various people can`t be wrong.





_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:02:15 PM   
Jack45


Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline
http://www.14thamendment.us/index.html
An obscure reading of the amendment is used to justify anchor babies, it needs to be addressed. Of course with the Kagan and Sotomayor and Ginsburg and Breyer appointments the present opinion will most likely stand.
Good, worse is better.
The future: Tribal warfare over the goodies, what's left of them.


(in reply to thornhappy)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:03:28 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
How hopeful.......

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Jack45)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:03:57 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
Not fucking likely....

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:06:41 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

There should be a mechanism, to allow these people to become US Citizens.


I would not object to a relatively easy path to permanent legal resident status for illegal aliens who have proven they are otherwise productive members of society.
But American citizenship is too valuable, to me, ever to be a reward for illegality.

(in reply to joether)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:12:18 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

http://www.14thamendment.us/index.html
An obscure reading of the amendment is used to justify anchor babies, it needs to be addressed. Of course with the Kagan and Sotomayor and Ginsburg and Breyer appointments the present opinion will most likely stand.
Good, worse is better.
The future: Tribal warfare over the goodies, what's left of them.




And that's if we're not successfully invaded.

(in reply to Jack45)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:21:26 PM   
Hanscuff18


Posts: 22
Status: offline
I can't stand illegal anything, especially gangs and so forth. Not all illegal immigrants are criminals, per se, save for the fact they are here illegally. Someone might want to mention that many, many "illegal immigrants" work in this country and social security is taken out of thier checks. Several of whom will never collect. The same holds true for Federal Withholding taxes and they do not file. Seems profitable for the government in some ways.

Not to argue, and off topic, but NH isn't a conservative state unless you count voting for Bush in 2000. The Senators are 1 Democrat and Judd Gregg who doesn't vote party lines and is vacating his seat probably to be taken by Hodes a Democrat. Both representatives are Democrats as is the Governor. They also voted for Kerry and not Bush the second election.

I've never heard Keith Olbermann say anything that even remotely sounded like fear. He likes to call Sarah Palin an idiot though.

(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 5:58:39 PM   
vincentML


Posts: 9980
Joined: 10/31/2009
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Section 411(d) of PRWORA permits States to expand alien eligibility
by providing State or local public benefits to illegal aliens. But this
may occur only if the State enacts a law after August 22, 1996, that
affirmatively provides that illegal aliens are eligible to receive (all
or particular
) State or local public benefits.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/law-reg/finalrule/tanfru_2.htm

I dont believe Butch indicated the parents were ever eligible, but stated they got it through their legally born children. Note the above. TANF can be made available to illegal aliens per their final ruling;


But Tazzy, aren't there work requirements and time limits set by law in TANF? Doesn't that limit the numbers of elegible families? The discussion on here is reminescent of Ronald Reagan's "Welfare Queen" rhetoric in his campaign for president.

The average number of monthly recipients for welfare (AFDC) in 1996 was over 12 million. In 1997 when TANF began the number dropped to a little over 10 million. By 2007 it was down to under 4 million. A very large percentage of that number are kids.

I think it has increased since the recession of 2008 no doubt, but it is not like the world is coming here to get rich on our welfare. Four million people out of a population of more than 300 million is barely a bit more than 1.0 % of our population.

And btw, do we have any idea how many States if any have made TANF available to illegals?

It seems shameful to bicker over helping such a relatively small number of needy people. Mainly, it is political passion at work here to point fingers at so few and think that will resolve our national economic problems. Pretty ugly stuff I think coming from the dispassionate Conservatives.

TANF is a WORK program, people. It ended "welfare as we knew it." About time we dispensed with the old "Welfare Queen" mythology that is being applied here to aliens and deal with the more substantial problems of what to do with these people. John McCain was for comprehensive reform before he was against it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Assistance_for_Needy_Families

_____________________________

vML

Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. ~ MLK Jr.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 6:17:46 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

"I have heard various people say that women drawing AFDC and other welfare rarely stop after the first one."



Well.........that settles it. Various people can`t be wrong.






That is how Fox reports the news... "People say..."

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 6:32:13 PM   
thornhappy


Posts: 8596
Joined: 12/16/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

OK...they stay home...poor lifestyle...poor healthcare for their children...poor schools...poor housing…OR... They have their children in the US... Better jobs...better healthcare...better schools...better housing and utilities…welfare to offset costs.

What decision would you make?

Butch

I'd think long and hard about it - the wages sure aren't enough to compensate for the cost of living and housing, or you wouldn't have 8 guys set up in a one-bedroom apartment, or anyone living in colonias.  Many illegals are men who send home money to support families back in Mexico and Central America.  There are entire villages filled with nothing but kids, women, and guys too old to make it to America.

(in reply to kdsub)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 6:35:00 PM   
juliaoceania


Posts: 21383
Joined: 4/19/2006
From: Somewhere Over the Rainbow
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

http://www.14thamendment.us/index.html
An obscure reading of the amendment is used to justify anchor babies, it needs to be addressed. Of course with the Kagan and Sotomayor and Ginsburg and Breyer appointments the present opinion will most likely stand.
Good, worse is better.
The future: Tribal warfare over the goodies, what's left of them.




I find it very entertaining when people post sources with no "about us" section or "Who we are" section...

What, is this some third grader that made this website?

_____________________________

Once you label me, you negate me ~ Soren Kierkegaard

Reality has a well known Liberal Bias ~ Stephen Colbert

Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people. Eleanor Roosevelt

(in reply to Jack45)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 7:32:25 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

I've never heard "press two for Chinese" have you?

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 7:59:32 PM   
truckinslave


Posts: 3897
Joined: 6/16/2004
Status: offline
quote:

as I understand how these systems work....doing nothing gets you English


Then you misunderstand the majority of them.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 9:44:52 PM   
FatDomDaddy


Posts: 3183
Joined: 1/31/2004
Status: offline
FR...

Birthright Citizenship is a Hallmark of American ideals and of our Nation and it should not be tampered with EVER!

If the political powers that get elected in the country would do their jobs, secure and where necessary seal and our borders and ports AND prosecute the people hiring illegal aliens, then this would not be an issue at all.


< Message edited by FatDomDaddy -- 8/7/2010 9:45:44 PM >

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:03:02 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: vincentML


quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

Section 411(d) of PRWORA permits States to expand alien eligibility
by providing State or local public benefits to illegal aliens. But this
may occur only if the State enacts a law after August 22, 1996, that
affirmatively provides that illegal aliens are eligible to receive (all
or particular
) State or local public benefits.

http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/ofa/law-reg/finalrule/tanfru_2.htm

I dont believe Butch indicated the parents were ever eligible, but stated they got it through their legally born children. Note the above. TANF can be made available to illegal aliens per their final ruling;


But Tazzy, aren't there work requirements and time limits set by law in TANF? Doesn't that limit the numbers of elegible families? The discussion on here is reminescent of Ronald Reagan's "Welfare Queen" rhetoric in his campaign for president.

The average number of monthly recipients for welfare (AFDC) in 1996 was over 12 million. In 1997 when TANF began the number dropped to a little over 10 million. By 2007 it was down to under 4 million. A very large percentage of that number are kids.

I think it has increased since the recession of 2008 no doubt, but it is not like the world is coming here to get rich on our welfare. Four million people out of a population of more than 300 million is barely a bit more than 1.0 % of our population.

And btw, do we have any idea how many States if any have made TANF available to illegals?

It seems shameful to bicker over helping such a relatively small number of needy people. Mainly, it is political passion at work here to point fingers at so few and think that will resolve our national economic problems. Pretty ugly stuff I think coming from the dispassionate Conservatives.

TANF is a WORK program, people. It ended "welfare as we knew it." About time we dispensed with the old "Welfare Queen" mythology that is being applied here to aliens and deal with the more substantial problems of what to do with these people. John McCain was for comprehensive reform before he was against it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temporary_Assistance_for_Needy_Families



First, i brought it up only because someone mentioned illegals cannot get welfare. TANF states they can. I can only assume there are limitations. I never stated they were collecting for a lifetime or getting rich. Merely pointing out the error of the posters.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to vincentML)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:09:51 PM   
ThatDamnedPanda


Posts: 6060
Joined: 1/26/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave

quote:

Conservative myths to the contrary, having children in order to collect public assistance is not a profitable venture, for illegal immigrants or legal residents.


I've never heard conservatives say having children on welfare was "profitable".


Read the thread. That was exactly what Butch was implying when he suggested that illegals have children in order to get the welfare benefits.



quote:

ORIGINAL: truckinslave
I have heard various people say that women drawing AFDC and other welfare rarely stop after the first one. Which is what they call, you know a fact. Rather than madeup BS like, you know, profitable.


No it's not, it's bullshit. You're listening to the wrong radio station again.


_____________________________

Panda, panda, burning bright
In the forest of the night
What immortal hand or eye
Made you all black and white and roly-poly like that?


(in reply to truckinslave)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: 14th amendment debate - 8/7/2010 10:38:48 PM   
kdsub


Posts: 12180
Joined: 8/16/2007
Status: offline
Panda I'm not conservative... moderates can dislike illegal aliens who purposely take advantage of our welfare system too.

_____________________________

Mark Twain:

I don't see any use in having a uniform and arbitrary way of spelling words. We might as well make all clothes alike and cook all dishes alike. Sameness is tiresome; variety is pleasing

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: 14th amendment debate Page: <<   < prev  2 3 [4] 5 6   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078