nephandi -> RE: Grudgingly given aftercare - long post (8/13/2010 7:49:18 PM)
|
Greetings I am going to tell a little story. A few years ago I and Aswad had a female friend with a severe allergy to fruit, she has since moved away from our home city but at the time we spent allot of time with her and her boyfriend. Now me and Aswad are not rich, going out to eat is a rare treat but once while visiting our two friends we had planned to go out eating afterwards. Now suddenly our friend invited herself to go with us. I told her that she should not go as they did serve fruit at the restaurant, but no she was going, not wanting to be rude we let her. Now once at the restaurant she asked the woman running it if she could get guaranteed fruit free food. The lady at the restaurant said that they could set aside one cooking area for her, but they could guarantee nothing, still our friend insisted on eating there. Now we ordered, took a few bites and our friend started to get an reaction. Turns out the table beside us had lemon in their drink. Yes her allergy was that bad, she could literary die from someone on the table beside her squeezing lemon into their drink. So we had to leave our food and go with her outside. Now we offered to help take her to the emergency room a few block away, but she refused, so we ended up sitting watch over her the entire night and eventually having to call and ambulance to take her to the hospital. Now what do this story have to do with the topic at hand? It had to do with forcing responsibility for your own actions onto others. Now off course we sat with our friend and got her help but where we angry at her? Hell yes, she had not only nagged to go with us, she had ignored every warning and when she got sick she even refused to got to the doctors to just get a shot and she would have been fine, instead she created the situation where we, her boyfriend and another friend spent most of the night hovering over her until she had to go to the hospital. Now we never wanted the responsibility for her life and well being, we just wanted to go out and eat, she forced that on us. Had she fallen and broken her leg that would have been something different, that would be no fault of her own. But she choose to go to a restaurant knowing full well that pepole we so severe allergy really can not go to such places, sad but true, she set up the the situation. Now the OP of this thread had the situation where her boyfriend did not want to play, perhaps the whole reason was that he did not want to provide aftercare right that as for many it is a deeply emotional experience, she then go ahead and play with others without even asking him if he would provide aftercare if it was needed. Now when she then comes back to the room in trouble from a situation she herself have set up she get angry because her boyfriend only give the bare minimum of aftercare, that is frankly stupid. Do I think the boyfriend acted correctly, no. I would have given the aftercare and then spoken with my lover the next morning explaining that her behavior was unacceptable that either if I did not want to play she would have to find others to provide aftercare or not play at all, just like we told our friend that we would not take her with us to a restaurant again. But I think he should have taken care of her right then and there, it has to do with compassion for another human being. But the hell did he have the right to be angry. I do not want to play means I do not want to play, no part of playing, and that includes aftercare, she had no right to force that on him. Had he been the one Topping her, or if she had spoken with him up front about her expectations then the situation would have been different, but since that was not the case she basically forced him to be a part of her play when he had told her he did not want to and I definitely understand him getting angry over that. I wish you well
|
|
|
|