RE: should they burn the quarun?

RE: should they burn the quarun? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion

Message

kdsub -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/8/2010 9:42:02 PM)
I think in reality it makes no difference if this book is burned or not when it comes to the safety of our soldiers. If they don’t burn the book do you think when an American soldier is in their gun sites they won’t pull the trigger? No… the reason not to burn the book is because doing so is un-American …Insulting to millions of our own citizens. This proposed action does not represent Christians in America any more than Al Qaeda represents Islam in Saudi Arabia. We, meaning the US, have lost the battle of propaganda mostly because of our free press and freedom of speech… and the assholes who burn books… I think it is worth it but stupid as hell. Butch

Vendaval -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/8/2010 10:03:32 PM)
It seems the Jerry Springer crowd is now on the nightly news. quote: ORIGINAL: tazzygirl Gene Prince, the interim chief of Gainesville Fire Rescue, told the Sun on Wednesday that under the city's fire prevention ordinance, an open burning of books is not allowed. He said if the church goes ahead with its plan, it will be fined. And the church's intentions aren't the issue. "It wouldn't matter what the book is they're burning," Deputy Chief Tim Hayes told the Sun. http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/20/religious-leaders-speak-out-against-international-burn-a-quran-day/ I had heard this earlier on the news. Should be interesting.

Aneirin -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 3:28:21 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Moonhead I'm told the reason you invaded Afghanistan in the first place was that was where OBL was holed up. You're aware that the radical Jihadist element would far rather see English translations of the Koran burned than in the hands of infidels? They're mostly shi'ites, who take a very purist line to that sort of thing. In that light, the intended insult to Islam is very feeble indeed. The radicals won't give a shit, but the moderates might get offended. Still, what else can you expect from a publicity seeking Baptist fuckwit who's using the deaths of thousands of people to raise his media profile? Well, if these people want to fight radical Islam that much then the way is clear, give them a gun and get them out on the front line and there take the place of someone who doesn't need to be there beyond their job and maybe there might be a few less reports of soldiers getting killed or injured for another man's war. In fact to go further on this, round up all the radical anti Islamists and put them to war with the radical of the other interpretation of god, or is it whilst radical Islamists are willing to fight and die for their beliefs, the Christian variant of that mentality are just plain chicken, all words and no action beyond insults. Let these religious wars be fought by the religious.

LaTigresse -> Real Heroes, not religious zealot ZEROS!!! (9/9/2010 3:43:06 AM)
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/09/opinion/09kristof.html?th&emc=th This is what is needed. Not stupid reactionaries trying to incite more violence.

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 7:09:30 AM)
Well educated Muslims, Pakistani lawyers in fact, during a protest in which they are demanding we respect their Koran... [8\|] [image]http://d.yimg.com/a/p/ap/20100909/capt.a64454c324fc4f1eb7528649bb2a7796-a64454c324fc4f1eb7528649bb2a7796-0.jpg?x=400&y=265&q=85&sig=mn_QkSaVC7am9DWwMAzQog--[/image]

juliaoceania -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:23:34 AM)
San, I have a question... why are you constantly justifying right wing reactionary religious zealots?

Moonhead -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:27:21 AM)
Probably because he knows fuck all about Pakistan, in this case.

juliaoceania -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:40:58 AM)
It is odd that a grown person would continue to insist because someone in the world somewhere did some sort of assholish thing, that justifies someone next door to him doing similar assholish things. Would he argue that because some extremist in Iraq beheaded a journalist that this justifies someone in the USA kidnapping a Muslim and beheading them? Seriously... I suppose as a parent, the whole entire argument that "so-and-so did it, so it makes it okay for me" is laughable. It is also extraordinarily juvenile.

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:42:14 AM)
Do you really think that picture justifies them? I dont. The point Im making is that they have the right to demonstrate just as left wing reactionary religious zealots have the right to demonstrate, just as Pakistani Islamic zealots have the right to demonstrate (or at least they should have). And if I didnt play the devils advocate on a lot of these issues who would. quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania San, I have a question... why are you constantly justifying right wing reactionary religious zealots?

Moonhead -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:43:19 AM)
I think the term I'd choose is "pathetic" rather than "odd".

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:43:45 AM)
Im not insisting on any such thing little girl, grow up. quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania It is odd that a grown person would continue to insist because someone in the world somewhere did some sort of assholish thing, that justifies someone next door to him doing similar assholish things. Would he argue that because some extremist in Iraq beheaded a journalist that this justifies someone in the USA kidnapping a Muslim and beheading them? Seriously... I suppose as a parent, the whole entire argument that "so-and-so did it, so it makes it okay for me" is laughable. It is also extraordinarily juvenile.

Lucylastic -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:47:25 AM)
devils advocate? LMFAO yeah and Im the queen of sheba nice try at backpedalling snorts I love it when you do that, you just made my day

juliaoceania -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:47:37 AM)
You continue to post red herrings that have nothing to do with the fact that some asshole is planning on burning holy books. Instead of saying, "Hey, man, that is just fucked up", you continue to post counter examples that seem to be a quest to justify such behavior. Now, you want to continue to justify this disrespect that threatens our troops, knock yerself out! But you sound extraordinarily babyish... but that is nothing new.

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:49:08 AM)
I should add that I also find it highly ironic that such Muslims as pictured demand we respect anything of theirs...

HELPsupport -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:53:19 AM)
That's horrible! (having just read the article via the link) And, not only that, but, it is very illegal. Let's start with oppressing another religious group; then, there is the whole fire without a permit thing; then, there is inciting a riot. I don't care if the riot is in another country: their announcement to do something that is a detrimental disrespect of other person's religious beliefs has incited a riot and they should all be arrested and charged with the crime. Especially as what they are doing is not going to be looked on by those people as one little church group making the decision, but, as Americans attacking the Quarun. It's a stupid, childish, ill thought out plan! At the very least, they should be locked up until the day is past!

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:53:21 AM)
What have I posted that justifies anyone burning anything julia? The only point I have made is that we should defend everyones right to demonstrate freely and openly and that the Muslims demonstrating in Pakistan who were burning the American flag really dont have grounds to dictate to us about burning anything. quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania You continue to post red herrings that have nothing to do with the fact that some asshole is planning on burning holy books. Instead of saying, "Hey, man, that is just fucked up", you continue to post counter examples that seem to be a quest to justify such behavior. Now, you want to continue to justify this disrespect that threatens our troops, knock yerself out! But you sound extraordinarily babyish... but that is nothing new.

juliaoceania -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:58:25 AM)
There are Muslim Americans in this country that worship in peace. They are your fellow AMERICANS. I know this is hard to understand, but there is no "them" and "us" - they are us... don't you get it? You are justifying alienating and disrespecting your fellow citizens. Perhaps you know no one that is Muslim. Perhaps in your isolated world they don't exist, but they do in my reality. There are peaceful neighborly Muslims in every major city in this nation. Now you can continue to post about extremists that do not represent most moderate Muslims as to support the religious extremists that are going to burn Korans... or you can grow the fuck up and condemn all religious extremism....your posting shows a person that believes destroying holy books of people who aren't even your enemy is justified because someone somewhere burned a bible... I should start a bible burning group and go and throw a bible burning in the town that this ignorant asshole is going to burn Korans... what would you say about ME if I did that? What kinda human being does such hateful shit just to get even?

MasterCord -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 8:59:39 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: juliaoceania It is odd that a grown person would continue to insist because someone in the world somewhere did some sort of assholish thing, that justifies someone next door to him doing similar assholish things. Would he argue that because some extremist in Iraq beheaded a journalist that this justifies someone in the USA kidnapping a Muslim and beheading them? Seriously... I suppose as a parent, the whole entire argument that "so-and-so did it, so it makes it okay for me" is laughable. It is also extraordinarily juvenile. Conservative as I am, this burning is juvenile. I agree with Julia 100%. There are certainly parts of the Bible rife with violence so it's a bit hard to "throw stones". We now have the absurd image of Muslim and Christian spoiled brats, sitting in a sandbox throwing sand at each other, calling their Mommy and breaking each others' toys. What possible good can come from EITHER...a Muslim center within blocks of Ground zero....or some Christian pastor behaving like an idiot and burning the Islamic equivalent of his own Bible. Yes, they both have the RIGHT to do what they are doing....but it isn't about "rights" in either case. It's about intent, message and sensitivity. What next? Bible burning in Mecca? Christian Crusaders attacking restaurants where middle-eastern food is served? Being of the Islamic faith does not equal incarnate evil, any more than such a thing is inherent in being Jewish, Christian or Atheist. The whole bunch of them need to be taken to the woodshed and given a good whuppin'. If there IS a God up there, He must have His face buried in His hands wondering what he was thinking..... MC

Sanity -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 9:02:41 AM)
Again, how is anything Ive posted justifying burning a Koran? Answer that, or quit making the childish accusation, as Ive not attempted to justify any such thing. Burn all the bibles you want, I dont care and I highly doubt you will receive death threats from all corners of the globe when you do so. I also doubt that the president and the secretary of state and the director of homeland security and the justice department and various generals stationed overseas will take any notice or be alarmed whatsoever.

juliaoceania -> RE: should they burn the quarun? (9/9/2010 9:13:19 AM)
I reviewed all your posts on this thread. Not once have you said burning a Koran is wrong. Not once have you said it shouldn't be done, even though they may legally have the right... I said repeatedly that they have the right, but that doesn't make it right. Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge that this is wrong, and it shows that there are a few whackos in every country willing to do extreme shit to make a point? The more you post about what "they" do, the more it sounds as though you are justifying burning holy books. It doesn't

Page: << < prev 6 7 8 [9] 10 next > >>

Collarchat.com © 2025

Terms of Service

0.046875