Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant)


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:39:55 AM   
MastrVran


Posts: 354
Joined: 3/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious


quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran

Or is there some secret thread limit I am not aware of and we must keep threads down to some number. (joke)

Well you might think it a joke, but in reality there *is* an unspoken limit-to start an identical thread would be a much bigger violation of forum etiquette. Think about it: if one poster starts duplicate threads in different forums asking the same question but with a different request for answering viewpoints, the Mods delete all but one of the threads. Why should it be different if *two* people start identical threads?

It would be much ruder to the Mods (and to anyone who doesn't want to follow two threads on the same subject, but wants all the information in one place) if I were to follow your suggestion. Again, why are you placing politeness to the OP above politeness to the Mods and to other users?


First off I am suggesting that Politeness is something that once was normal. Now its at the best the exception. I do like how you make me rude to Mods by suggestion someone start a thread where all are welcome to reply. Also I never suggested going into other forums. Now if it is too much trouble for you to read two seperate threads, then perhaps to you that is rude? I can accept you feel that way. I see it as both parties being polite. The poster gets their wish and you get your replies. Seems fair.

MV

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:42:12 AM   
SpiritedRadiance


Posts: 1341
Joined: 3/3/2010
Status: offline
I think its rather rude on a forum that has the rules for anyone to post anywhere to request specifically for only a certain sect of people to answer.

Its an open forum we all know that, so why do people go out of their way to be rude and say Hey ONLY SO AND SO can answer it screams that SO and SO are somehow better then any other poster or sec of people.

I post when i think my opinion or experience will be useful, Regardless of what section and what place or what request was made. I dont care if you find it rude that im posting in ask a master or im a sub  and your requested femdoms. I think requesting it in its self is whats rude, not people replying with actual information relevant to the topic.


_____________________________

"Theres nothing in life like the feeling of cool leather sliding over your skin, the tears that fill your eyes as you realize someone else thinks you deserve it even if you havent reached that conclusion yet"- Forever to remember 11/5/11

(in reply to Twoshoes)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:43:28 AM   
thishereboi


Posts: 14463
Joined: 6/19/2008
Status: offline
quote:

Now if it is too much trouble for you to read two seperate threads, then perhaps to you that is rude?


Did you miss the part where that is against TOS and the mods will delete one of the threads?


_____________________________

"Sweetie, you're wasting your gum" .. Albert


This here is the boi formerly known as orfunboi


(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:44:37 AM   
MastrVran


Posts: 354
Joined: 3/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Twoshoes

Sometimes people do start a new thread for the other perspective.

Personally, I just politely apologize for not being the target audience, give my perspective, get thanked 20% of the time for my contribution.
My advice in the "Dealing with someone chaotic and free spirited" topics is better than people I don't understand.


Thank you

A reasonable approach and you used politeness to do so. Unlike the people who just blast the OP with with you cannot stop me from posting and how dare you even suggest it. Being polite is never a requirement. It is however a sign of character. Even on a place such as this.



MV

(in reply to Twoshoes)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:46:27 AM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline
The VAST majority of posters stay out of these boards.

The Gorean section more than any other seems to be largely left to itself. That may be because it seems almost no one here can post in less than 7 large paragraphs. Or it may be because they don't understand or care to.


Either way, this rant is a Fail.

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:47:42 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran

First off I am suggesting that Politeness is something that once was normal. Now its at the best the exception. I do like how you make me rude to Mods by suggestion someone start a thread where all are welcome to reply. Also I never suggested going into other forums. Now if it is too much trouble for you to read two seperate threads, then perhaps to you that is rude? I can accept you feel that way. I see it as both parties being polite. The poster gets their wish and you get your replies. Seems fair.

I'm not making 'you' rude to the mods, I'm stating that your suggestion would involve a breach of etiquette, which would be rude. Starting a duplicate thread is rude. You might not like that, but it's the truth-you are forcing the Mods to watch two threads instead of one, you are forcing users to check back and forth between two threads, and you are forcing a different topic of the front page of the forum by taking up the space.

Thinking about it, starting a thread demanding only one point of view in response also seems rude. Would you walk up to a group of people in public and demand that only the men in that group interact with you, for instance? Of course you wouldn't-that would be terribly disrespectful.

So why is it ok on a forum? You talk about the decline of manners-I think posters demanding that a section of the forums not respond to them is just as much a part of that as anything else.


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:48:08 AM   
MastrVran


Posts: 354
Joined: 3/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: leadership527

It's not that I couldn't start a new thread Vran... it's just that I don't perceive the need. What's going on here is that your perception of politeness and mine aren't entirely aligned. In such cases, I find no problem drawing from the larger community standards which in this case are clear. God knows I don't post on such threads to be an ass. I try hard to avoid threads wherein my input is likely to be unhelpful (most threads on the mistress or gorean boards for instance and pretty much every thread involving some detailed kink).



As always, good points.

MV

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:48:34 AM   
DesFIP


Posts: 25191
Joined: 11/25/2007
From: Apple County NY
Status: offline
OP, if you want people to respect your wishes, then you have to be worthy of that respect.
Moreover no one ever learns anything new by restricting information, learning, communication, et al.

You learn when you get confronted with things you don't want to hear and hear them with courage and an open mind. Someone like that will earn others' respect and will give it in turn.

Unfortunately, experience has proven that when someone says they only want to hear from a narrow segment of people, what they mean is that they believe this narrow group will agree with them and tell them what they want to hear. As we know, what people want to hear is rarely the truth.

I feel no necessity to pander to a closed mind. YMMV


_____________________________

Slave to laundry

Cynical and proud of it!


(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:50:56 AM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

The VAST majority of posters stay out of these boards.

The Gorean section more than any other seems to be largely left to itself. That may be because it seems almost no one here can post in less than 7 large paragraphs. Or it may be because they don't understand or care to.


Either way, this rant is a Fail.


Pssst, Floofy, you know we're in Ask A Master, right?

....right?


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:56:15 AM   
LadyPact


Posts: 32566
Status: offline
(Fast reply until I have the opportunity to read the content of the thread.)

Would you like to have the gender debate, the chromosome debate, or the lifestyle debate? 

I have said this multiple times when this discussion has entered this particular forum before.  I am a person who practices the leather lifestyle.  Unlike the Gorean lifestyle, the title of Master is not one held by men alone.  This is something that is a significant difference between us.  In the leather lifestyle, it is a title that can be held by a man or a woman.  In fact, our protocols have much more to do with experience in living this way.  Not whether someone has a penis or not, but rather how long they have successfully run their M/s dynamics in their authority.  Even amongst Master's themselves, that is what determines whether one is junior or senior to another.  Our protocols specifically state that gender is not to be a factor when showing courtesy and respect for each other.

There may not be as many leather people on these boards as there once were.  That does not make our lifestyle any more or less valid than anyone else's.  I probably hold higher requirements for Myself in the title than a heck of a lot of people on these boards do. 

I was granted My Master's Cap by the leather community in April of 2008 with My husband and My side and My boy at My feet.  It wasn't something that I asked for and truthfully, most people who receive one don't think it is something they deserve.  My leather family and community thought that I did.  I'm not going to disrespect their opinion for some random message board.


_____________________________

The crowned Diva of Destruction. ~ ExT

Beach Ball Sized Lady Nuts. ~ TWD

Happily dating a new submissive. It's official. I've named him engie.

Please do not send me email here. Unless I know you, I will delete the email unread

(in reply to leadership527)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 11:57:50 AM   
leadership527


Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008
Status: offline
Awww, LP... it's no fun having the leather debate unless SimplyMichael is here to have it with you*laughs*.

I need to bring popcorn down to PVE next time so I can sit and watch the fireworks *chuckles*.

_____________________________

~Jeff

I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me
I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:01:16 PM   
Jeffff


Posts: 12600
Joined: 7/7/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff

The VAST majority of posters stay out of these boards.

The Gorean section more than any other seems to be largely left to itself. That may be because it seems almost no one here can post in less than 7 large paragraphs. Or it may be because they don't understand or care to.


Either way, this rant is a Fail.


Pssst, Floofy, you know we're in Ask A Master, right?

....right?





Ummmmmm..... nope........ oops!

I am kinda workin' here.


Can't a brother get a break?

_____________________________

"If you don't live it, it won't come out your horn." Charlie Parker

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:01:21 PM   
Twoshoes


Posts: 1218
Joined: 7/27/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jeffff
[...]That may be because it seems almost no one here can post in less than 7 large paragraphs. Or it may be because they don't understand or care to.

Either way, this rant is a Fail.

Yes, this thread is painful to read.
I admit defeat (only managed to read 20%).

I'm taking the walk of shame into the rain outside.

(in reply to Jeffff)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:02:25 PM   
MastrVran


Posts: 354
Joined: 3/15/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: VaguelyCurious

quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran

First off I am suggesting that Politeness is something that once was normal. Now its at the best the exception. I do like how you make me rude to Mods by suggestion someone start a thread where all are welcome to reply. Also I never suggested going into other forums. Now if it is too much trouble for you to read two seperate threads, then perhaps to you that is rude? I can accept you feel that way. I see it as both parties being polite. The poster gets their wish and you get your replies. Seems fair.

I'm not making 'you' rude to the mods, I'm stating that your suggestion would involve a breach of etiquette, which would be rude. Starting a duplicate thread is rude. You might not like that, but it's the truth-you are forcing the Mods to watch two threads instead of one, you are forcing users to check back and forth between two threads, and you are forcing a different topic of the front page of the forum by taking up the space.

Thinking about it, starting a thread demanding only one point of view in response also seems rude. Would you walk up to a group of people in public and demand that only the men in that group interact with you, for instance? Of course you wouldn't-that would be terribly disrespectful.

So why is it ok on a forum? You talk about the decline of manners-I think posters demanding that a section of the forums not respond to them is just as much a part of that as anything else.



Interesting veiwpoint. In public asking a large part to be silent would indeed be rude. However I have heard all my life people saying to the group, ok for this question lets just hear the guys point of veiw. Usually there was no issue, or the women asking for it, or children go to your room, this is for the adults to talk about. Usually it was followed by a different threaddiscussion where the women or men got their say.

I do like how somehow having two competing threads is somehow forcing people to read either of them. if you want to follow a thread badly enough, they will follow them. If not they will ignore them and the thread dies.

As for asking for some to abstain from replying, since their opinions will not be from the perspective wanted, I do not see that as impolite, rather than as just trying to keep it focused on what was desired. Now I freely admit some of the OPs do seem to go out of their way being a jerk at times. Just as some repliers make a huge stink that they have the right to post to anything.

Now this is just something I noticed and commented on. All replies and veiws are of course welcome. Even though I may not agree with you.

MV

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:09:57 PM   
mstrjx


Posts: 2045
Joined: 11/27/2005
Status: offline
To the OP,

What would happen if it were decided that, in this rant about rights, that you weren't right?

Now would you please put on a shirt? You're creeping me out.

Jeff

_____________________________

Know thyself. It's the best gift you can ever give yourself.

(in reply to igor2003)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:16:36 PM   
laurell3


Posts: 6577
Joined: 5/5/2005
Status: offline
The forums are not just about the OP. Threads are supposed to generate intelligent discussion from and FOR everyone here.

The assumption that someone making a post saying only male masters have something to contribute to this thread is not only rude in and of itself, it's ridiculous. As a participant of these forums, I would like to hear everyone's opinions on the subject, and cannot possibly begin to fathom how one could have any rational basis for saying only one role would have anything to offer on the subject. I'm quite thankful that the rules don't support such inane and irrational fantasy type of assumptions about people in general. In my opinion those type of requests are either coming from an approach of I'm all subbly and no sub has anything to offer me or I am DOM hear me roar and no sub has any opinion I will ever listen to. The problem with those type of approaches is they are completely contrary to the purpose of a forum and well, pretty freaking idiotic.

_____________________________

I cannot be defined by moments in my life, but must be considered for by the entirety of my existence.

When you fail to consider that I am the best judge for what is right for me, all of your opinions become suspect to me.

(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:24:14 PM   
VaguelyCurious


Posts: 5264
Joined: 12/2/2009
From: United Kingdom
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran

Interesting veiwpoint. In public asking a large part to be silent would indeed be rude. However I have heard all my life people saying to the group, ok for this question lets just hear the guys point of veiw. Usually there was no issue, or the women asking for it, or children go to your room, this is for the adults to talk about. Usually it was followed by a different threaddiscussion where the women or men got their say.

Well then we have very different backgrounds. I've never been spoken to like that, and I would consider that rude.

quote:

I do like how somehow having two competing threads is somehow forcing people to read either of them. if you want to follow a thread badly enough, they will follow them. If not they will ignore them and the thread dies.

But making them follow two threads instead of one is an inconvenience, and deliberately inconveniencing people for no good reason is rude. Can you not see that?

quote:

As for asking for some to abstain from replying, since their opinions will not be from the perspective wanted, I do not see that as impolite, rather than as just trying to keep it focused on what was desired.

In order for that argument to be valid you have to place the OP's desire for the direction of a thread over the desires of all other readers, and I do not accept that. What the OP is saying is 'I will only have replies from certain people because the direction I want this thread to take is more important than the direction anyone else wants this thread to take'. Again, that is rude. The OP does not own the thread. It is not theirs to direct.


_____________________________

Sthetic on FetLife.




(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:27:05 PM   
WyldHrt


Posts: 6412
Joined: 6/5/2008
Status: offline
quote:

I certainly did notice that. Yet if it turns out that doing something a different way was better or would have been better, does it invalidate a request to do it differently?

Request? Funny, I didn't see a request in that particular OP, I saw a rude demand that a certain segment of the board not reply. It is also worth noting that the OP was about the very people that were 'requested' not to post. To me, that is the height of rudeness. Were I to start a thread saying that I think Goreans are ridiculous for structuring their lives around a bunch of fantasy books and ended said OP with, "I won't bother replying to Goreans. I am not interested in your opinion" would that not be extremely rude? Would your polite nature preclude you from posting a rebuttal?

Many times, the reaction one gets to such a request in the OP depends on how the 'request' is phrased. OPs who say something like, "I'd like to get the Masters' perspective on this one" get a much better reaction than those who say, "I ONLY want to hear from Masters! If you are not a Master, do not reply!!" Expecting people to be polite in the face of an OP that is rudely phrased is a bit much.


_____________________________

"MotherFUCKER!" is NOT a safeword!!"- Steel
"We've had complaints about 'orgy noises'. This is not the neighborhood for that kind of thing"- PVE Cop

Resident "Hypnotic Eyes", "Cleavage" and "Toy Whore"
Subby Mafia, VAA Posse & Team Troll!

(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:31:29 PM   
Zevar


Posts: 801
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: MastrVran

First off let me say this, I would hope, no Moderator should feel the need to come in and say according to CM policy anyone, everyone and their mother can make any post anywhere anytime. Thats a given. People have the right to post as they please so long as it is within the allowed way.

With that said, I am noticing a trend where someone says I want a specific perspective from just one type of personality. A Master, a slave, a Mistress or whatever followed by a slew of people, who are not the type requested, who just HAVE to post their own answer. You know what? They have the right.

Having the right though does not mean you are "In the right". What ever happened to people who respected someones wishes? Oh that doesnt matter, "I HAVE THE RIGHT!!!" What is that? some battle cry of the Poor Oppressed? In some way asking to just get a particular opinion viewpoint makes your life less by asking not to see your opinion?

In the past people had the right to tell others...go to the back of the bus, don't drink from that water fountain, yours is around back, no you cannot eat here. They had the right. The law supported them. Is this the same as that? Of course not, other than it is the same answer people give when they want to do something which is supported by some law or rule but which is really not the "Right" answer. Oh I know most of those whose opinions just have to be included will not admit to this as being correct because by Golly they have "THE RIGHT". Yes they do. No one argues that you do not have the right. You have the right to be rude. To ignore peoples requests. To step on peoples feelings. To force yourself on others in an online forum even if asked not to. Collar me gave you that Right with its rules.

Now as said, we can always do what is allowed even if it is not the polite thing to do. People seem to feel being polite is no longer worth while. Or maybe just they really do not give a crap because they have to show through their posts just how their opinion could not have been lived without. I do not know. Perhaps I just miss the times when people were not just impressed with having the right, but also wanted to be "in the right".

Perhaps thats just me? And yes this is just my opinion. It is not a fact or written in stone lol. Just something I decided to comment on. Oh and everyone is asked to reply. Please feel free.

MV


Greetings MV:

It appears after reading your words & then re-reading them again that they are merely a misguided diatribe. I do not say this to offend you, yet to tell you in an honest manner how your words come across when read. It also appears as though you have some underlying agenda that you have no control over thus you vent where others will respond to give you a pseudo sense of control, even if your choice to do so is to your own detriment. I fail to understand the principle of forsaking self respect thus leading to merely spewing what you cannot contain due to lack of self control. Where is self-mastery cast to then? I say, consider your motive before you posture as though you believe your own words spoken as they only serve to gain disrespect. Right never VS Right. Only refusing to acknowledge one is wrong lends toward defacing the power in doing what is right. The ole internal mirror reflects back into the eyes of the one looking at their self with the image of what they ventured to look at within, nothing more & nothing less. Why do what is right for the sake of being right? Because one knows it to be right and does it if others are looking or not. Now that is integrity, aye!

Take care!

(in reply to MastrVran)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) - 9/9/2010 12:32:51 PM   
Missokyst


Posts: 6041
Joined: 9/9/2006
Status: offline
If the forum was owned and run by the OP, then rules might be set. However, posting a query in a public forum that has no limitations about who is allowed to respond is just being a jackass. They are rude by changing the rules that are already in place by the moderators. Sure they can ask for one or the other person to respond, but that does not mean that ONLY that person or the other should be allowed to respond. Why? The rules were not set in place by the OP. When they wish to create their own forum they can set the rules. Anything less is arrogance.
No one may respond to this post unless they are wearing a green paisley shirt. If they do I will throw myself down and have a hissy fit.

(in reply to VaguelyCurious)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Having the right vs being in the right (Rant) Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094