juliaoceania -> RE: Obeying isnt 1 +1 (9/24/2010 4:25:25 PM)
|
quote:
i did not say anything about "naturally submissive women," so i am not sure what you are quoting. my statement was that you clearly have a negative view of those with "generally submissive personalities." i was very specific on purpose, so as to not get the topic muddled with petty semantic misunderstandings. Okay... please let me know what a "generally submissive personality" is, because I truly do not know. If you do not want to muddy up the thread, feel free to email me a specific trait list. I am being accused of having a negative view of you, when I do not see you as anything but text. I have no idea what your personality is, or how I am prejudiced against it. In the meat world I deal with all sorts of personalities... from the quiet to the gregarious, from the depressed and anxious to the upbeat and content. I have never ran across one person I would label as a "submissive" personality... ever. quote:
but for some of us it is not about acting, or a conscious choice, it is just who we are, the way we engage with the world around us, and we must learn to deal with the negativity and difficulties that can sometimes be a result of that. in supposedly defending another woman's right to submit or not in the way which is right for her, you (who knows, perhaps unconsciously) belittle and devalue a different type of submission. When I was in my 20s I went to work for a company my mom worked for. My mom's boss was constantly telling my mom I needed to be more assertive, and this was a definite drawback to my working life, and because my mom's boss was fond of her and me she ran interference for me. I just would never speak up and I let people run me over... including not saying anything when certain people lied about me. It just was not "naturally" in my nature to stand up for myself. I still avoid confrontation, but I have built up my ability to deal with it, and to realize that the valuable contributions I have to give to the world necessitate I speak up and not be hesitant to take the lead. Being a single mom helped with that, also. quote:
in fact, the overwhelming majority of the time ONLY an alternative view is presented here. and that view is that submissive women should be strong, independent, take no crap from anyone, submit on their own terms or not at all, and above all else...are absolutely not doormats, ___ (fill in with expletive of your choice)!!!! submission is a gift, submission must be earned, a Dominant had better prove himself to be worthy and bow in gratitude when they receive a submissive's obedienc I do not know if it is "should", so much as maybe that is how many of us "are". There is a difference between "should" and "is". I see no problem with being the sort of person who does not take crap from anyone because I do not see the value in "taking" crap. I have had to take a lot of crap in my life, and I wish I had taken less of it. You can interject the opposite and see how many people would find it healthy for them... Here is the opposite "submissive women should be weak, dependent, take crap from everyone, submit only on other people's terms, and must be doormats.....submission isn't a gift [i halfway agree with that one], submission must be given away without regard to who it is given to, and a dominant shouldn't worry about proving he is a decent person who merits being in a relationship, and in fact should take his submissive for granted" If the above makes ya happy, or anyone else for that matter, well go you! quote:
now i'm aware that you personally do not buy into all of the above (maybe just 2 or 3 points), but that is the predominant message preached here on collarme and the other popular lifestyle websites. yes, every female here may receive unsolicited mail from wankers demanding we "submit" by sending them a naked picture or meet them at the local Wal-Mart in 10 minutes. but everyone with an ounce of common sense recognizes those people as the jokes they are. that does not represent the messages expressed by articulate, passionate and respected members of the community. I went to a real live munch for the first time recently, with real live people. Most of them seemingly took all of this completely in their stride much more so than internet folk. No one attempted to dom me as soon as I arrived. They were genuinely happy to make a new acquaintance... there were a couple of invites sent my way, but no one demanded ANYTHING from me. I think the community is probably a lot more laid back about what submissive and dominant are... in fact there were a lot of switches there. quote:
so, just as it's important to you that people, particularly questioning and impressionable newbies, understand that submission is not limited to having an overall submissive personality or those who are "naturally" obedient...it's important to me that people understand that there is absolutely nothing wrong with having a submissive personality, with being naturally inclined to obey, and that you have a place of value in the world. In the context of this thread, which is from the vantage point of someone not "naturally" obedient, how is that helpful in light of the dominant presence on this thread that seems to assume that obedience should be as easy as 1 2 3 , or the sub isn't ready to be a sub? I could see why you would need to assert that view on a thread where the submissive posting it was being told she was a doormat for having a "submissive personality", but that isn't what is happening on this thread.... quote:
as always i just wish the overall message could be a positive one, where all different types are embraced and accepted. we can validate the experience and journey of one person without invalidating the journey of another. I wish that were true too, unfortunately for the person that posted this thread, it wasn't the case as their particular troubles within their dynamic were not respected or validated by some members of this "community"
|
|
|
|