RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


subtoFemDommes -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/24/2006 11:59:38 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux
I was talking to a friend of mine the other day about all of this.  He is a 9/11 conspiracy nut.  I asked him a series of questions about his beliefs, each of which was harder for him to answer in a rational fashion.  After a while, we got down to brass tacks: he believes that there are 12 Jewish families who are manipulating world events for their own ends.

 You know, the thing about this that really gets me pissed off, is that when I was refusing to go through with a Bar Mitzvah, no  one told me I might be able to get in on this action if I stayed in favor with the clan...
.
quote:

He replied that there is a cadre of interdimensional (or alien, it was never made clear) beings called Cassiopeans who are the *real* puppet masters and who are manipulating the 12 Jewish families for their own mysterious ends, which might be to bring about a heightened state of human consciousness.

Uh, so he's still "a friend"? [sm=banana.gif]

I have friends with different, but just as extreme needs to believe there's some special order running the world.  The funny thing is that they would tell you they are athiests or agnostics, but to me, this fills their need for some "higher power". 

Art Bell made himself a very rich man peddling crap like this, while mixing it with more reasonable fare.  Perhaps someone here could enlighten me as to of whom it has been said, "His genius was to mix absolute truths with absolute lies." (A reference to some famous manipulator in history that was used in an article about a former head of the Seattle Symphony, of all things) but Art did it well, so do others.  But you can't have an act without an audience.




MadameDahlia -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 1:18:02 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

Elvis is alive... isn't he?


I couldn't help myself:

E.L.V.I.S.
L.I.V.E.S.

Eerie, yes? *Grins*




UtopianRanger -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 1:46:00 AM)

quote:


I was talking to a friend of mine the other day about all of this.  He is a 9/11 conspiracy nut.  I asked him a series of questions about his beliefs, each of which was harder for him to answer in a rational fashion.  After a while, we got down to brass tacks: he believes that there are 12 Jewish families who are manipulating world events for their own ends.  According to him, they are motivated by greed and a lust for power, and are seeking to bring about an apocalyptic nuclear war.  I asked him why they would do this, since a nuclear war would kill all the consumers and destroy the world's economy.  He replied that there is a cadre of interdimensional (or alien, it was never made clear) beings called Cassiopeans who are the *real* puppet masters and who are manipulating the 12 Jewish families for their own mysterious ends, which might be to bring about a heightened state of human consciousness.  Or, alternatively, maybe it's evil demons.   He's not quite sure.


What you’re doing here is trying to take logical, dissenting view-points, brought forth by folks who disagree with the government’s version of 9-11 and embellish them to the point of absurdy – No one here is talking about demons or space aliens.

But to speak to your case :  I’ll absolutely go on record and say that I believe beyond a shadow of doubt, that we are no longer a country governed by its very citizenry, and instead besieged by the very greedy, self-absorbed practice of Oligarchical collectivism.

I can cite example after example where the people make their voice known, yet the ''few'' decide much to the contrary.
 
How can a government who so obviously doesn’t trust its very people, expect its people to trust it?


 - R





UtopianRanger -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 2:09:55 AM)



quote:

What air defense system?  One of the things that concerned a lot of real military planners is that US thinking had become so missile oriented that we really didn't have a viable air defense system.  Back in the 50s, fighters all over the country were on +15 alert and some were even at +5 (this envolved the pilot sitting in the aircraft)


Almost missed ya John! I'm speaking in regards to protocol. I will dig it up and cite tomorrow night. ; }


 - R




Rule -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 3:06:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Gauge

I have read everything on here and I am stunned...

 
I am not one to trust the government.

You clearly do. Previously I listed as causes of denial: do not want to know the bad news, gullibility, or being part of the conspiracy. Now I would like to add naïveté.




NeedToUseYou -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 3:23:23 AM)

Hmmmm, ok, here's the logic to me anyway. If someone could prove it was our government that did it. That is a very easy situation to resolve. A few hundred people really compromises the greatest majority of power in what we call the government. It would be taken care of in weeks. And if I believed it was the government, I would work to that end and my belief is most americans would as well.

However, despite all the theories, it is nearly impossible, for the government to do what is proposed. So, they'd have to keep the crew that supposedly put the charges in the WTC to be quiet to cause the demolition style implosion. They'd have to keep the records of installing remote control devices on domestic aircraft quiet. They'd have to keep a whole military base quiet where they landed the planes(at least in some theories they did this then sent in a missile). They'd have to keep all the photo analysis people quiet. They'd have to keep all the government video analysis people quiet. They'd have to control all the people working on the 9/11 report quiet. They'd have to keep all the field investigators quiet. They'd have to have every high level authority in government in on the conspiracy to keep them from investigating. I'm sure I'm missing  more people  that would have to remain quiet.

But it literally would have to be thousands of people all holding a pact of silence, working together to pull this off. I'm no expert, but it's hard enough keeping things quiet when dealing with small groups of people, I can't imagine that it would even be possible to keep something that would require so many people to orchestrate, and subsequently cover up to even make it feasible. We aren't talking shredding a couple pieces of paper. But talking about suppressing 1000's of people that would be exposed to one portion of the plan or another into a permanent state of coverup. Anyone of which could blow the top off the whole thing.

To me this would be a very, very,. very risky plan just to get an excuse to invade afghanistan and use it as a partial excuse to invade Iraq. Odds are greater such a conspiracy that required so many people would lead to the fall of our own government, moreso than the invasion of third world nations. It just doesn't work out.

That video is very old as well, I'm suprised any of these are new to anyone interested in the subject.




Rule -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 3:58:13 AM)

You have got a sharp mind, NTUY. The only thing that is holding you back is disbelief. Better start trusting that sharp mind of yours and to start distrusting your disbelief.
 
So add disbelief as the fifth cause for denial.




JohnWarren -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 5:08:13 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: subtoFemDommes
The planes hitting the WTC were hitting a paper bag compared with the structure of the Pentagon, where the plane was the paper bag.


With a lot of encouragement [old man reaching out for fuzzy TV screen) I'm baaaaack.
 
When the pentagon was being built, the builders were aware at some point it might be bombed.  After all, they were in the middle of a war.  It's reasonable that its construction would be "mil-spec,"  at least by 1940 standards.  Heavy concrete, lots of steel.  The mindset of these builders and those of people making peacetime skyscrapers would be very different.




Arpig -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 5:56:19 AM)

The sixth and final cause for denial: The patent absurdity of the claim being denied.

The final debunk of this idiocy is this...I challenge all those conspiracy believers to tell me just one thing, and I am not even going to require you to back your answer up with anything more than logic and common sense....WHY?

Why did the Government do it?




NeedToUseYou -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 6:03:52 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

You have got a sharp mind, NTUY. The only thing that is holding you back is disbelief. Better start trusting that sharp mind of yours and to start distrusting your disbelief.
 
So add disbelief as the fifth cause for denial.


So, you believe that 9/11 was orchestrated by the government and all involved are staying silent? You believe 1000's are being quiet? If you believe that then the conspiracy would have started well before the present president, as the time to put all the required people into vital government/Military positions would take a very long time. So, at the least to even give any creditablity to the theory, you'd have to believe they must have started installing the appropriately minded people beginning with the Bush Senior administration, continued through the Clinton Administration, and completed the setup with Bush Jr. So, if the conspiracies are true.The  Clintons and Bushs would have to be in bed along with the military leaders, and at least part of the Congress. I'm sorry it's just to far fetched that the vast majority of the government would do this just so we could invade the middle east.  It gets to point where you talking about 10000 to 1 odds of this occuring.

As we could of just invaded Afghanistan and Iraq anyway, without all of this. It just wouldn't be popular but hey the acceptance caused by 9/11 really only lasted to afghanistan. I mean if that is what they did it for, it was a failed attempt if you ask me, as this country already is split over Iraq, and the issue over Iraq isn't even really related to 9/11. It doesn't seem to be much of a factor in the current Iran debate either.






Rule -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 6:17:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

The sixth and final cause for denial: The patent absurdity of the claim being denied.

Metal usually is heavier than water. It is therefore patently absurd that metal ships can float.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Arpig

WHY?

Why did the Government do it?

I could tell you why, but suspect that you would call the reason 'patently absurd'.
Nevertheless, I have high hopes for you. Seriously. Anybody who asks why is close to supplying the answer himself. So start digging until you hit gold.




Moloch -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 6:27:14 AM)

Here  http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm .
I used to torch 18 wheeler truck frames for a living, if you get a peice of aluminum hot enough it will "vaporize".
I swear Im gonna hit somebody with a roll of aluminum tin foil!
There are people WHO WITNESSED THE PLANE SMASH INTO THE BUILDING, that is all the proof I need, but I guees Im wrong they are clones controlled by the "men in black" to lie to the public.




Rule -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 6:34:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

You believe 1000's are being quiet?


Sharp mind on course in a rowing boat. Disbelief keeps the rowing boat from changing into an ocean liner. Think bigger.
 
quote:

ORIGINAL: NeedToUseYou

It gets to point where you talking about 10000 to 1 odds of this occuring.

Those are good odds. The odds of winning the lottery are a lot worse. I am sure that a mind like yours can improve very much on those odds, as you already are nearly spot on. Keep digging. Kick out your disbelief too: it is obstructing you.




Arpig -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 7:06:03 AM)

quote:

Metal usually is heavier than water. It is therefore patently absurd that metal ships can float.

Actually Rule, a very simple scientific principle known as displacement makes it patently obvious that metal ships will float...metal is heavier than water, but the water displaced by a ship weighs more than the ship...see, its really very easy...the ship is hollow, so it is lighter than the water it displaces....so the metal ship bit is just bullshit (much like the 9/11 conspiracy).
quote:

I could tell you why, but suspect that you would call the reason 'patently absurd'.

In other words..."I have no logical reason whatsoever to support my inane theory, so I will pretend there is indeed a very compelling reason but I won't tell you what it is, on the excuse that you won't believe it, and therefore deflect the question"

Sorry Rule, not good enough, give a compelling reason for the US government to have murdered thousands of its own citizens, or shut up...baseless innuendo might fly in Amsterdam, but since we can't go down to the local hash house to start our day, we tend to require a little thing called a motive.......
The ball is in your court, put up or shut up




mistoferin -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 7:13:19 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: pollux

I'm not sure just what propaganda it is you feel intelligent people are being suckered by, but in case you're addressing your post to people who think the official version of events is accurate...


Nope...that wasn't my intended audience at all. I thought I was being pretty clear but just to make sure there is no confusion...I am not even slightly convinced of this whole conspiracy theory. Like I said....I don't trust the government much but this is stretching it just a bit far. For instance....if there really was no plane that hit the Pentagon....just exactly where are all those folks from flight 77? Do you think maybe the government has them stored away at someplace like Area 51?

Quite frankly, I don't think much of the level of intelligence shown by most of those connected with the powers that be to begin with.....now you all are expecting me to believe that literally thousands of them were involved in this highly involved plan, its execution...and the ensuing cover up? Puh-lease folks. Don't you think that might just be a slight overestimation of their intellectual capablities?




MHOO314 -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 7:30:44 AM)

which in My humble opinion, would mean piles of rubble OUTSIDE the building, versus the paper bag theory--and uhm where is the FAA report in the search for the black box?
 
One last thought, thousands of gallons of jet fuel would cause a flash fire igniting the entire area around the building and send it as a ball of flame deep inside---hmmmm where are the pictures of that? We saw that at the Twin Towers, but none at the Pentagon?
 
IMHO, if anyone thinks we are above conspiracy, please--if anyone thinks we didn't know ahead---please--the world is based on two things, money and control--money and control buy everything.




Arpig -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 8:18:44 AM)

So why did the Gvt do it????  No answer = no conspiracy




MHOO314 -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 8:39:41 AM)

Where is the passenger list? Where was the memorial service for the passengers who died? Where is the lone sister or wife or husband of a passenger who stood up and said, my xxx died on that flight, where are the claims for that plane from the enemy?
 
What people saw was "something" streaming through the sky--but one would think a plane streaming at that height that fast would have taken oit a heck of a lot BEFORE it hit the building and there would have been no question what it was.  Having been an investigative police officer, people under duress are the most subjective to suggestion in an effort to reconcile what they saw--sorry I dont buy.

 
If you think the govt doesn't have its hands in sticky messes think again, the govt will and would think nothing of sacrificing a few lives to rally the support of the American people--it has and it will continue, in the name of "freedom from tyranny and oppression".




subtoFemDommes -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 8:43:31 AM)

quote:

which in My humble opinion, would mean piles of rubble OUTSIDE the building, versus the paper bag theory--and uhm where is the FAA report in the search for the black box?
 
One last thought, thousands of gallons of jet fuel would cause a flash fire igniting the entire area around the building and send it as a ball of flame deep inside---hmmmm where are the pictures of that? We saw that at the Twin Towers, but none at the Pentagon?
 
IMHO, if anyone thinks we are above conspiracy, please--if anyone thinks we didn't know ahead---please--the world is based on two things, money and control--money and control buy everything.


Sorry Ma'am; the black boxes were recovered as was substantial debris. The conspiracy theorists just raise the leading questions about "why hasn't/didn't" or make wild speculations about what would or wouldn't be logical without any scientific testing, just analogous inference.

Speculation on what would or would not have happened in such an event is useless, whether as to the debris field or the effect of the fuel in a specific structure, but that's what makes the conspiracy theorists rich -- they can speculate and infer and ask leading questions forever. 

To refute their illogical, unsubstantiated blather takes painstaking, incredibly detailed work and the people who are capable of doing that really don't spend their lives refuting conspiracy theorists.  They are people with much more productive things to do.  Not to mention, if I claim that there are people on Venus because "obviously it reflects too much light and there are cities under the cloud cover generating it" I can go on forever pointing to every logical refutation of that as some sort of "conspiracy to keep the truth from people" and also infer a million underlying benefits to the conspirators.  They on the other hand have to refute me with a trip to Venus and even then, I'll say they faked the trip and threatened and cajoled and paid off all of the people who had to participate in the faking.  etc., etc., etc,. ... it's why you never can win this sort of argument, you can only offer facts until you loose interest.

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html

How many people would believe that if I can shoot you when you're under 3 feet of water with a .45 caliber bullet moving at 775 feet per second and maim or kill you, that a .50 caliber bullet, weighing from a little to twice as much and moving at 5 times the speed would essentially be useless in shooting at something under 3 feet of water.  That was an old "myth" about supersonic bullets, but until the Mythbusters proved it to be true (of every supersonic round tested) it was just a myth.  No one had actually invested the time and money to prove it.  So there, we have a myth substantiated, but only by scientific method. 

I use the ballistics example because I've had decades of research in the field; an expert I know has both participated in some of the landmark tests in the field and is abreast of every new one that comes out and what it's taught both him and me is, what you think will happen when objects collide at high speed is useless.  You will never know until you try and see.

One can make conspiracy claims and speculate all day long about anything, especially when people can be sucked in by the emotional component (which of course, the conspiracy theorists claim the  conspirators use) but all of it means nothing without evidence and I've read as much of the conspiracy evidence of 9/11 as anyone can stomach, had my good friend who lives and breathes it filter it my way, and none of it stands the light of day when you actually take the time to examine the other available evidence that one has to go and look for because no one is making money or political hay touting it as some huge government conspiracy.


quote:

Where is the passenger list? Where was the memorial service for the passengers who died? Where is the lone sister or wife or husband of a passenger who stood up and said, my xxx died on that flight, where are the claims for that plane from the enemy?


It's right here; You can call the relatives and talk to them.  i'll start finding them if You'd like...

http://www.cnn.com/SPECIALS/2001/trade.center/victims/AA77.victims.html





Amaros -> RE: Sept. 911 Rare footage. What really happened at the Pentagon? (4/25/2006 8:59:16 AM)

Oil of course - th neo-cons started planning for invading Iraq back in the late eighties - you'd a thunk they'd have got it right.


As far as conspiricy goes I'm undecided - it's plausible, but there isn't any direct evidence, and it's just as plausible that it happened as descrbed is the official version - albeit they may have left it out if that last airliner was shot down.

It is, however possible to fly these things remotely, and I've heard good arguments to support that theory too.

In any case, I'd be suprised if Bush were directly involved, he seemed pretty stunned afterwords - if there was any colusion, I'd be more likely to suspect the more rabid right wing financial arm of the party who have the most to gain from a war - there doesn't need to be any direct aid, a lot of how conspiricies actually work involves simply looking the wrong way at the right time.

If you're aghast that I coud imagine such a monsterous thing, try googling operation Northwoods.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.320313E-02