Atropos19
Posts: 56
Joined: 8/3/2006 Status: offline
|
The question, I think, is how many ppl it actually does "work for." Are there actually guys who get off on sending anonymous women money? And girls who get off on soliciting/receiving said funds? Maybe. But I think the vast majority of girls seeking "money slaves" here (and elsewhere) are simply amateur con artists and opportunists, and their marks are, for the most part, lonely sad sacks who have a hard time getting pretty girls to pay attention to them. If that were as far as it went, I might still say what the hell... there is a service being exchanged, so have at it. But in my experience (and judging by what I see on these girls' profiles)... the promised service isn't being rendered. The sad sacks keep getting bilked, and the attention they're desperately trying to pay for remains forever just over the horizon. Like a morsel of meat being dangled before a starving dog. And, try as I might, there's just no way I can respect someone who's willing to treat another human being that way. Immanuel Kant said it best (and I'm paraphrasing here, so bear with me): "Act as if to treat humanity, whether in your own person or that of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means." Note that he doesn't say you can't treat another person as a means, only that you can't treat another person *merely* as a means. So, for instance, in a typical prostitute/client relationship... as long as both parties respect each other as human beings and are clear about what each one expects to take from the encounter, I say game on (providing certain health and safety concerns are addressed and so on). In this situation, the women are deliberately preying on the vulnerability of a lonely (or, at the very least, naive) person. Therefore they fail the moral test.
< Message edited by Atropos19 -- 12/1/2010 1:37:43 AM >
|