Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 6:02:52 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Your hysterical, thank you for my morning laugh.



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 6:25:50 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Does this not point to a basic problem with the ethos and ethics of the organization?  Or is this just the result of political maneuvering on the part of ACORN opponents?


Neither.

It was never "voter fraud" it was "voter's registration fraud". 

We have a handful of people scattered across the country who wanted to be paid for work they didn't do.  They duplicated names from each others list or just filled in names.

Normally they would just get fired or at worst have the company try and take the pay check back.  Since this involved voter registration their stupidity earned them an arrest. 

The people convicted were petty thieves who picked the wrong pocket.


Let's try the actual news.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/101418199.html

http://articles.cnn.com/2008-10-22/politics/voter.fraud_1_voter-registration-acorn-workers-number-of-swing-states?_s=PM:POLITICS

Neither of your "actual news" contradicts anything in the article I posted links to.

Mighty nice of you to "give a pass" to an organization which has had 15 convictions to date on attempts to suborn citizen's rights to elect the officials they chose.

Firm

The organization does not have 15 convictions. 15 employees have been convicted. Want to bet more than 15 convictions for actual vote fraud and suppression have occured with people employeed by the GOP and entities it funds?

I thought you had learned your lesson about guilt by association.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 7:14:25 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Let's try the actual news.
http://www.jsonline.com/news/crime/101418199.html

http://articles.cnn.com/2008-10-22/politics/voter.fraud_1_voter-registration-acorn-workers-number-of-swing-states?_s=PM:POLITICS



Are you trying to imply The Daily Caller is not actual news?

It's one of the finest news sources for the conservative mind.

It ranks right up there with The American Thinker, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck.

You are attacking the source, without disputing the facts.

You don't have to trust the source, but when you only attack it as a source which doesn't hew to your particular ideological mindset, without any proof or explanation of how the facts are incorrect, it simply makes you look ... like an Alinskite.

As well, I think it's funny ... when I simply asked a question, you seem to be afraid to enter into a discussion, and state your opinion, but rather cast aspirations on a source so that you don't even have to discuss the issue.

rml ... you are a smart guy, but act like an ideologue and true believer in their worst possible definitions.

Firm



Actually there was a point behind that.

Conservative news sources tend to exaggerate the facts to pander to their base.

And before you say it I realize liberal news sources do the same, but to a much lesser degree.

Before Obama was elected we saw the same thing that Republicans and the conservative media did to Clinton, taking minor issues and blowing them completely out of proportion.

And is it just continuing.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 7:14:51 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Well Ken by Firm's reasoning Delay's conviction on money laundering and conspiracy means the entire Republican Party is guilty.  Right?

Since he was the house Majority Speaker and the money was funneled through the Republican National Committee they are all guilty.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 7:44:59 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Well Ken by Firm's reasoning Delay's conviction on money laundering and conspiracy means the entire Republican Party is guilty.  Right?

Since he was the house Majority Speaker and the money was funneled through the Republican National Committee they are all guilty.


Obviously.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 8:02:53 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain


No, what applies for Republicans is vote early and vote often. That's what I heard working in conservative election campaigns and that's what I saw Ann Coulter do and they never did anything to punish her. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain


I agree with you. ACORN got the vote out for the Democrats, that's his or Republicans real problem with them.

So "One man, one vote" only applies if they are voting Republican, huh?

Firm






Brain, that quote comes from James Michael Curly, mayor of Boston, Mass in the 30's I believe.
Others may have adopted it but I believe he is the origional one who that saying is attributed to.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 12:04:41 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

Actually there was a point behind that.

Conservative news sources tend to exaggerate the facts to pander to their base.

And before you say it I realize liberal news sources do the same, but to a much lesser degree.

Before Obama was elected we saw the same thing that Republicans and the conservative media did to Clinton, taking minor issues and blowing them completely out of proportion.

And is it just continuing.

Actually, all you are demonstrating is that your confirmation bias is alive and well.

You still have not disputed a single fact in the article.

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/25/2010 12:06:35 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 12:22:10 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

out of 400,000 - 500,000 employees.... hmmmm... not seeing the widespread fraud yet. But, its always a possibility.

So ... you don't see multiple employees, across the nation, who have all been convicted of similar crimes says anything about the organization which hired them?

Nothing about the employee vetting process?  Nothing about, perhaps, "any means to achieve the goal"?  And nothing about the care taken by the organization to ensure that the employees understood that illegal activities would not be tolerated?


Personally, no - of course not. But if you do, I'd certainly be interested in hearing you explain why.

Panda,

I was asking, not telling.

Certainly, my own biases (which I recognize) wants to lead me to the conclusion that there is something wrong with the organization, but I'm willing to learn.

I will say, however, that the people who are defending ACORN have put up a good defense that will be useful the next time someone starts screaming about how "all" Republicans are corrupt, due to the actions of a few.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to ThatDamnedPanda)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 12:23:46 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Well Ken by Firm's reasoning Delay's conviction on money laundering and conspiracy means the entire Republican Party is guilty.  Right?

Since he was the house Majority Speaker and the money was funneled through the Republican National Committee they are all guilty.

Not only do you not know my "reasoning", you do not appear to understand how to "reason" yourself.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 12:25:44 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Lucylastic

List of Republican party offenders
http://www.republicanoffenders.com/

incomplete list and less tidy list,  the offender democrats
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/2029856/posts

and this is going back oh 20 years and less... I think theres some perspective here, if more investigations were done into any government or private corporation , it would be the same

has anyone outside of acorn ever had such numbers of investigations and accusations(ok yeah the govmnt as a whole maybe). How  many were false? how many were found not guilty, how many were accused and lost their jobs to have charges dropped?

turn over any rock and you will find shit.. it  depends how much dirt and shit you really want to uncover and how you abuse it.

Id love to see the fraud and crimes in the insurance company, the financial companies, they seem to be largely ignored tho.
Strange that

Thanks Lucy.  Interesting links, and I agree (somewhat) with your comments.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to Lucylastic)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 1:06:25 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Yes, how silly of me.  You meant nothing by posting a right wing source which insinuated Acorn was guilty of voter fraud rather than using any of the available news sources.

Sorry you didn't invoke the arguments and yelling you were hoping to start.



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 51
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 5:03:58 PM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDamnedPanda

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

out of 400,000 - 500,000 employees.... hmmmm... not seeing the widespread fraud yet. But, its always a possibility.

So ... you don't see multiple employees, across the nation, who have all been convicted of similar crimes says anything about the organization which hired them?

Nothing about the employee vetting process?  Nothing about, perhaps, "any means to achieve the goal"?  And nothing about the care taken by the organization to ensure that the employees understood that illegal activities would not be tolerated?


Personally, no - of course not. But if you do, I'd certainly be interested in hearing you explain why.

Panda,

I was asking, not telling.

Certainly, my own biases (which I recognize) wants to lead me to the conclusion that there is something wrong with the organization, but I'm willing to learn.

I will say, however, that the people who are defending ACORN have put up a good defense that will be useful the next time someone starts screaming about how "all" Republicans are corrupt, due to the actions of a few.

Firm




The "all because of a few" excuse tends to be a republican trait.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 52
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 5:56:10 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tazzygirl

The "all because of a few" excuse tends to be a republican trait.

I tend to believe it's a human trait.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 53
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 5:57:48 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Yes, how silly of me.  You meant nothing by posting a right wing source which insinuated Acorn was guilty of voter fraud rather than using any of the available news sources.

Sorry you didn't invoke the arguments and yelling you were hoping to start.

What facts are untrue in the article?  Please be specific, or admit that it is nothing more than your biases speaking.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 54
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 7:41:51 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
Shall we start with title, "Voter fraud conviction"?  Shall we continue with this statement, "2010 has been a banner year for Acorn voter fraud convictions"?

You do understand the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud?  The individuals were convicted of voter registration fraud.  The article tries, where it can get away with it, in  making it seem as if there was voter fraud during the election.  Second which convictions were of Acorn?  They were for individuals who were stupid in trying to make a buck without doing the work. 

The news articles make that clear.  The right wing source you picked attempts to muddy the waters on that subject.

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Certainly, my own biases (which I recognize) wants to lead me to the conclusion that there is something wrong with the organization, but I'm willing to learn.


You finally made a true statement.  It was your bias that you used to post the article form the right wing source rather than the actual news articles.  The news articles are clear that these were individuals and refer to Acorn as the victim.  Clearly, as the news articles point out, neither the false names or the people who signed themselves up multiple times were going to be voting that way.  There was no benefit to Acorn, unless you can come up with a scheme which has Acorn printing false id's and trying to have people vote under those registrations.  If you can then I am all on board for nailing them to the wall.

It's your normal smoke and mirrors act.  You accuse everyone else of bias to distract from your own.

By your own conclusion if something is wrong with the organization known as Acorn for what these individuals did then something is wrong with the organization known as the Republican Party.  Tom Delay was the Majority Speaker when the acts he has been convicted for happened.  Doubly the RNC was involved in laundering the money. 

Ahhh, but I did see you stayed completely away from that topic when it was posted.


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 55
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 7:54:28 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Actually, all you are demonstrating is that your confirmation bias is alive and well.

You still have not disputed a single fact in the article.

Firm




And all you are demonstrating is your belief in this bullshit theory of confirmation bias is alive and well.

Tell me Firm, does belief in confirmation bias indicate a confirmation bias toward believing in confirmation bias?




< Message edited by rulemylife -- 11/25/2010 7:59:14 PM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 56
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 9:50:05 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

Shall we start with title, "Voter fraud conviction"?  Shall we continue with this statement, "2010 has been a banner year for Acorn voter fraud convictions"?

You do understand the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud?  The individuals were convicted of voter registration fraud.  The article tries, where it can get away with it, in  making it seem as if there was voter fraud during the election.  Second which convictions were of Acorn?  They were for individuals who were stupid in trying to make a buck without doing the work. 

The news articles make that clear.  The right wing source you picked attempts to muddy the waters on that subject.

You have an interesting way of thinking, fl.

I spent a little while looking for the exact federal regulation or law that defines "voter fraud", and was unsuccessful, but decided to not waste any more time down your rat hole.

First, you are attempting to narrow and impose a definition that doesn't seem to apply.  Apparently, what we are both talking about is better defined as "Electoral fraud":

Electoral Fraud Law & Legal Definition

Electoral fraud refers to is illegal interference with the process of an election. The definition of the term varies from country to country. Generally it includes illegal voter registration, intimidation at polls and improper vote counting. Even though technically the term 'electoral fraud' covers only illegal acts, the term is also used to describe acts morally unacceptable, outside the spirit of electoral laws or in violation of the principles of democracy.

Electoral fraud is also termed voter fraud.

And, from one of your own links that you attempted to use to "prove your case", the very same term ("voter fraud") is used for the same offense:


Former ACORN worker convicted of election fraud
By Bruce Vielmetti of the Journal Sentinel
Aug. 24, 2010

A former employee of an embattled community organizing group pleaded guilty Tuesday to voter fraud in connection with the 2008 presidential election.

Maria Miles, 37, of Milwaukee, admitted to submitting multiple voter registration applications for some people and to scheming with other Association of Community Organization for Reform workers to sign people up several times in an effort to meet the organization's voter registration quotas.
So, it appears that the term "voter fraud" is pretty generic, and perfectly acceptable to use in the context the original article is using it.

Firm




_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 57
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 10:01:11 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY
Certainly, my own biases (which I recognize) wants to lead me to the conclusion that there is something wrong with the organization, but I'm willing to learn.


You finally made a true statement.  It was your bias that you used to post the article form the right wing source rather than the actual news articles.  The news articles are clear that these were individuals and refer to Acorn as the victim.  Clearly, as the news articles point out, neither the false names or the people who signed themselves up multiple times were going to be voting that way.  There was no benefit to Acorn, unless you can come up with a scheme which has Acorn printing false id's and trying to have people vote under those registrations.  If you can then I am all on board for nailing them to the wall.

It's your normal smoke and mirrors act.  You accuse everyone else of bias to distract from your own.

By your own conclusion if something is wrong with the organization known as Acorn for what these individuals did then something is wrong with the organization known as the Republican Party.  Tom Delay was the Majority Speaker when the acts he has been convicted for happened.  Doubly the RNC was involved in laundering the money. 

Ahhh, but I did see you stayed completely away from that topic when it was posted.

As I pointed out above, you seem to be the one letting your biases get away with you.

As far as your attempts to avoid answering any questions about ACORN's possible culpability or responsibility for the actions of their employees, I can understand the desire to avoid any such thing: it conflicts with what you wish.

We can discuss culpability and responsibility for any organization for the actions of people who are part of their organization.  For the specific example you and others are advancing, I'd say that Tom Delay wasn't an employee of the Republican Party, and I doubt you'll find any Republican (or Democrat for that matter) who would say that their party endorses or encourages breaking the law for personal gain (and yes, I understand the issues with "politicians").

The next level of questions is whether or not an organization in which employees are directly trained and supervised by that organization has any responsibility when it has been found (through legal convictions, not even "just accused") of violating the very mandate that the organization says it has ("getting out the vote", "making every vote count" or whatever way you wish to say it).

No one (including you) has even tried to answer this question, only deflect, blame others, and insult.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 58
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 10:03:39 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Actually, all you are demonstrating is that your confirmation bias is alive and well.

You still have not disputed a single fact in the article.

Firm




And all you are demonstrating is your belief in this bullshit theory of confirmation bias is alive and well.

Tell me Firm, does belief in confirmation bias indicate a confirmation bias toward believing in confirmation bias?

Regardless of my opinion of flcouple's arguments, I have to say that he is head and shoulders above you, rml.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 59
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 11:01:44 PM   
Aylee


Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain


No, what applies for Republicans is vote early and vote often. That's what I heard working in conservative election campaigns and that's what I saw Ann Coulter do and they never did anything to punish her. Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.



Wait.

You saw Ann Coulter vote multiple times?

How did you manage that?

_____________________________

Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 60
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109