Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/25/2010 11:30:28 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Actually, all you are demonstrating is that your confirmation bias is alive and well.

You still have not disputed a single fact in the article.

Firm




And all you are demonstrating is your belief in this bullshit theory of confirmation bias is alive and well.

Tell me Firm, does belief in confirmation bias indicate a confirmation bias toward believing in confirmation bias?

Regardless of my opinion of flcouple's arguments, I have to say that he is head and shoulders above you, rml.

Firm



Firm, don't get them going on "Community Organizers!"
One of them's head will be spinning in circles and the other will be spitting pea soup!

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 12:40:49 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

Actually, all you are demonstrating is that your confirmation bias is alive and well.

You still have not disputed a single fact in the article.

Firm




And all you are demonstrating is your belief in this bullshit theory of confirmation bias is alive and well.

Tell me Firm, does belief in confirmation bias indicate a confirmation bias toward believing in confirmation bias?

Regardless of my opinion of flcouple's arguments, I have to say that he is head and shoulders above you, rml.

Firm



I think that would be an example of confirmation bias.



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 4:44:45 AM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
How much are you going to be charging for the tickets for this act and what is Pops pay as side kick?

The answer is actually no, you do not know the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud.

So apparently you believe that Mickey Mouse and the members of the Dallas Cowboys football team were actually going to show up and vote on these registrations?  The people who signed themselves up multiple times were going to attempt to vote for each registration?

Where was the motive?  What was the benefit?

To the "individuals" it was money.  They found a way to pick up a check without doing the actual work.  Normally this would have just gotten them fired, but now we've added voting into the mix so they've broken the law. 

Was there really a need to put those people in jail?  No, a suspended sentence and fine would have done the job just fine.  Their biggest offense was being dumb.

You believe that if they had actually been instructed and taught to do this, these people would not have immediately thrown that out to save themselves?

What was the motive and benefit for Acorn?  They got wasted time, wasted money, and accused of fraud.  You believe there was a grand scheme to actually have a vote cast for Mickey Mouse?  There was a scheme to somehow have these people who registered themselves multiple times actually cast a vote for each time they wrote the name down?

I'll, say this again, if you can find that scheme I am all for nailing them to the wall. 

If you want to argue that there was not enough over site I would probably agree.  When you look at some of the people hired it is reasonable to expect problems.

I would say it should be mandatory for EVERY group that does voter registration to cross check their list for obvious false names and multiple sign ups.  They are not going to catch all of them but the complete burden should not be on the election officials. 

I do have to say you really have slipped.  You generally do a much better job of covering up your bias and pretending it doesn't exist.

< Message edited by flcouple2009 -- 11/26/2010 4:45:32 AM >

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 9:57:03 AM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
In many of the cases of voter registration fraud laid upon ACORN it was ACORN which turned in the guilty parties, as required by law. When was the last time a right winger organization with knowledge of vote fraud, illegal vote suppression or voter registration fraud turned in an employee?

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 10:54:25 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

In many of the cases of voter registration fraud laid upon ACORN it was ACORN which turned in the guilty parties, as required by law.

Would you care to source that?

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 11:07:45 AM   
willbeurdaddy


Posts: 11894
Joined: 4/8/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Brain


No, what applies for Republicans is vote early and vote often.


Actually that is a Democratic expression regarding Chicago/Daley politics.

_____________________________

Hear the lark
and harken
to the barking of the dogfox,
gone to ground.

(in reply to Brain)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/26/2010 12:42:20 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

In many of the cases of voter registration fraud laid upon ACORN it was ACORN which turned in the guilty parties, as required by law.

Would you care to source that?

Firm


http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us/politics/11acorn.html

Can find others if you insist but searching through google keeps bringing up all the right wing drivel and that is tedious since I know that you'll simply try and handwave away anything presented.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 67
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 10:39:30 AM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

In many of the cases of voter registration fraud laid upon ACORN it was ACORN which turned in the guilty parties, as required by law.

Would you care to source that?

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/11/us/politics/11acorn.html

Can find others if you insist but searching through google keeps bringing up all the right wing drivel and that is tedious since I know that you'll simply try and handwave away anything presented.

I thought about just letting this go, as you are rarely rational in your responses, but I decided to go ahead and point out the problem with your "proof" article of October, 2008.

From your source:

“Rumors of Acorn’s voter fraud have been greatly exaggerated and to a large extent manufactured,” Bertha Lewis, the organization’s interim chief organizer, or chief executive, said Monday in a conference call to announce that the organization had registered 1.3 million people to vote.

Ms. Lewis said it was Acorn itself that informed state officials about some questionable registrations collected by its employees that are now under investigation. Acorn said it had terminated the workers involved.

Does Nixon's "I am not a crooked" right a bell?

That's your sole defense, ya know.  A leader in the organization makes an unsubstantiated claim of innocence: and in your mind, that makes it so.

Right.  I know a salesman that has some swamp land in Florida for sale, DK ...

Actually, all you have really done with your "proof" is bring the question of Obama's culpability into the issue.  A quote from your own article:

“Even before I was an elected official, when I ran Project Vote voter registration drives in Illinois, Acorn was smack dab in the middle of it, and we appreciate your work,” Mr. Obama said, according to a post Mr. Graham-Felsen made in February.

"What did he know, and when did he know it?"

Damn.  And I thought this thread was dead.

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/27/2010 10:40:23 AM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 68
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:00:05 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
Actually I said I could provide further evidence but that it was annoying to dig through all the right wing blogs returned by the search. Your handwave is of course what I predicted so here is another link:
http://www.kmbc.com/politics/10214492/detail.html


(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 69
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:06:31 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

Actually I said I could provide further evidence but that it was annoying to dig through all the right wing blogs returned by the search. Your handwave is of course what I predicted so here is another link:
http://www.kmbc.com/politics/10214492/detail.html

That the best you got? 

Now I can understand why you don't want to waste any time looking.  So far, you've not only not proved your case, you've even hurt it more.

I''ll refrain from embarrassing you on this one, and see if you actually come up with anything of that actually supports your position.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 70
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:08:02 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
What's in the article firmy wants so badly to dismiss
quote:

ACORN officials in Kansas City said they turned in the four people who were indicted.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 71
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:26:42 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
You should refrain from embarrassing your self.  You have gone along way to show you bias knows no limits and your reading comprehension is sketchy at best.

But keep on trucking the comedy routine is great fun.

Did you ever find where I said Palin was a Presidential candidate?  Just wondering since you were so adamant I had.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 72
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:31:34 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

What's in the article firmy wants so badly to dismiss
quote:

ACORN officials in Kansas City said they turned in the four people who were indicted.


That's the way to selectively quote DK!

Let's put that sentence into context:

First, this is a story from 2006, and does not involve any of the 15 convictions that are under discussion.

Second, consider the actual sequence of events:

The Kansas City Election Board told KMBC they found suspicious forms, such as seven applications from one person and an application for a dead man.

...

ACORN officials in Kansas City said they turned in the four people who were indicted.

"We're very happy that they were indicted," said Claudie Harris with ACORN.

It's a little unclear about the timeline, but these paragraphs seem to suggest that it was like this:

1. Election Board finds irregularities.
2. Election Board calls in law enforcement.
3. There is an investigation.
4.  Unknown people working for ACORN were implicated.
5.  ACORN "turns in" the four people already directly indicted.

Of course, if you have better information, I'm willing to reconsider the timeline.

However, based on your own article, it appears that ACORN did not "find a problem" and then go to the authorities in any attempt to be above board, and honest.  Rather, it appears that they waited until some of their people were actually indicted, and then gave up the names.

This is far from your what you seem to be claiming.

Want to try again?

btw, the thought that came into my mind, when I read the ACORN comment "We're very happy that they were indicted," was that a more accurate summation would have been "We're very happy that they were indicted, and not us."

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 73
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:35:32 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

You should refrain from embarrassing your self.  You have gone along way to show you bias knows no limits and your reading comprehension is sketchy at best.

But keep on trucking the comedy routine is great fun.

Did you ever find where I said Palin was a Presidential candidate?  Just wondering since you were so adamant I had.

You didn't even read either of his articles didja, fl? 

You might consider following the link at the bottom of his second one, as there is even more juicy stuff in that one, although, again, those incidents are from 2006.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 74
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 12:40:09 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

Firm, don't get them going on "Community Organizers!"
One of them's head will be spinning in circles and the other will be spitting pea soup!

Seems like you are a good prognosticator, popeye.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to popeye1250)
Profile   Post #: 75
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 1:46:03 PM   
flcouple2009


Posts: 2784
Joined: 1/8/2009
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

How much are you going to be charging for the tickets for this act and what is Pops pay as side kick?

The answer is actually no, you do not know the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud.

So apparently you believe that Mickey Mouse and the members of the Dallas Cowboys football team were actually going to show up and vote on these registrations?  The people who signed themselves up multiple times were going to attempt to vote for each registration?

Where was the motive?  What was the benefit?

To the "individuals" it was money.  They found a way to pick up a check without doing the actual work.  Normally this would have just gotten them fired, but now we've added voting into the mix so they've broken the law. 

Was there really a need to put those people in jail?  No, a suspended sentence and fine would have done the job just fine.  Their biggest offense was being dumb.

You believe that if they had actually been instructed and taught to do this, these people would not have immediately thrown that out to save themselves?

What was the motive and benefit for Acorn?  They got wasted time, wasted money, and accused of fraud.  You believe there was a grand scheme to actually have a vote cast for Mickey Mouse?  There was a scheme to somehow have these people who registered themselves multiple times actually cast a vote for each time they wrote the name down?

I'll, say this again, if you can find that scheme I am all for nailing them to the wall. 

If you want to argue that there was not enough over site I would probably agree.  When you look at some of the people hired it is reasonable to expect problems.

I would say it should be mandatory for EVERY group that does voter registration to cross check their list for obvious false names and multiple sign ups.  They are not going to catch all of them but the complete burden should not be on the election officials. 

I do have to say you really have slipped.  You generally do a much better job of covering up your bias and pretending it doesn't exist.


Let's try backing up because your poor reading comprehension missed this post.

I'll ask again what was the benefit?  You believe there was some grand scheme to actually have people show up and vote on the registrations?

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 76
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 2:03:02 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

quote:

ORIGINAL: flcouple2009

How much are you going to be charging for the tickets for this act and what is Pops pay as side kick?

The answer is actually no, you do not know the difference between voter fraud and voter registration fraud.

So apparently you believe that Mickey Mouse and the members of the Dallas Cowboys football team were actually going to show up and vote on these registrations?  The people who signed themselves up multiple times were going to attempt to vote for each registration?

Where was the motive?  What was the benefit?

To the "individuals" it was money.  They found a way to pick up a check without doing the actual work.  Normally this would have just gotten them fired, but now we've added voting into the mix so they've broken the law. 

Was there really a need to put those people in jail?  No, a suspended sentence and fine would have done the job just fine.  Their biggest offense was being dumb.

You believe that if they had actually been instructed and taught to do this, these people would not have immediately thrown that out to save themselves?

What was the motive and benefit for Acorn?  They got wasted time, wasted money, and accused of fraud.  You believe there was a grand scheme to actually have a vote cast for Mickey Mouse?  There was a scheme to somehow have these people who registered themselves multiple times actually cast a vote for each time they wrote the name down?

I'll, say this again, if you can find that scheme I am all for nailing them to the wall. 

If you want to argue that there was not enough over site I would probably agree.  When you look at some of the people hired it is reasonable to expect problems.

I would say it should be mandatory for EVERY group that does voter registration to cross check their list for obvious false names and multiple sign ups.  They are not going to catch all of them but the complete burden should not be on the election officials. 

I do have to say you really have slipped.  You generally do a much better job of covering up your bias and pretending it doesn't exist.


Let's try backing up because your poor reading comprehension missed this post.

I'll ask again what was the benefit?  You believe there was some grand scheme to actually have people show up and vote on the registrations?

Straw-manning will get you nowhere, fl.

Read what I wrote, not what you wish I had said.

Firm


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to flcouple2009)
Profile   Post #: 77
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 2:16:48 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

What's in the article firmy wants so badly to dismiss
quote:

ACORN officials in Kansas City said they turned in the four people who were indicted.


That's the way to selectively quote DK!

Let's put that sentence into context:

First, this is a story from 2006, and does not involve any of the 15 convictions that are under discussion.

Actually I said this
quote:

In many of the cases of voter registration fraud laid upon ACORN it was ACORN which turned in the guilty parties, as required by law. When was the last time a right winger organization with knowledge of vote fraud, illegal vote suppression or voter registration fraud turned in an employee?

And you demanded sources. I presented the unrefuted statement by the organizations leaders and a news story detailing one instance. I never said anything about a time frame.

Now why don't you respond to the question I asked?

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 78
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 2:25:19 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

And you demanded sources. I presented the unrefuted statement by the organizations leaders and a news story detailing one instance. I never said anything about a time frame.

I requested sources.

The unsupported statement of the party of interest is not, by itself, "proof" of anything, unless you already wish to believe them.

And the statement was refuted.  By me.

I deign not to address the rest of your rhetorical tricks and deflection attempts.

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 11/27/2010 2:27:33 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to DomKen)
Profile   Post #: 79
RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions - 11/27/2010 2:51:16 PM   
DomKen


Posts: 19457
Joined: 7/4/2004
From: Chicago, IL
Status: offline
So you're sticking to your hypocritical guilt by association claims despite teh hypocrisy of it being made clear to you. So much for your repeated claims of open and fair mindedness.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 80
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: Acorn's 2010 Convictions Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4] 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094