leadership527
Posts: 5026
Joined: 6/2/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CelticPrince At times being screwed is ok if the correct result is reached. now me lad, I do know that you have the capacity to have we readers understand the deeper meanings that run through the veins of you and carol! Enlighten us friend. ROFL.. I didn't mean to imply that there were any SPECIAL meanings between Carol and I. To my knowledge, the only thing I think of as "special" between us is that we are deliriously happy. I have very little confidence that I understand what D/s means to most of the posters here too. I wouldn't even know how to begin the conversation in this venue and format (I make a stab at it below which I believe fails miserably). It's the kind of thing that can be discussed over the coffee table with a great deal of difficulty and becomes utterly impossible in more restricted and combative environments. At the view from space level, consider the answer that various answers that said, "It gets me hot". I'm not about to argue that that's not dominance and submission -- clearly it is. But it's also incomprehensible to me because the thing I'm thinking of is not sexually linked. So then my answer of "I've always been this way" gets to be muddy... "what way" exactly? Oh, that "dominant" way? What way is that? I think a lot of the problem I have expressing it in precise words in a short post in an adversarial forum such as a discussion board is that the thing I'm looking at when I personally say "dominance" is primal. The problem with primal things is that they exist below the level of intellectual thought and so aren't really subject to all the words that go along with intellect. My favorite example of this is trying to describe an orgasm. At least me, I just cannot because if I'm having an orgasm, then my brain isn't working at the level of words. It's busy saying "GOOOOOOOOOOOOOD!" So when I'm being "dominant", my lizard brain isn't dealing in contracts, commitments, obligations, promises, consent, or any of that. That is all WAY too civilized by a few hundred million years. In addition, the thing I'm referring to is not limited to my interactions between myself and Carol. I experience this everywhere in my life. So whatever it is, it's not sexually linked. I don't want to have sex with every man and woman I meet. So then I end up struggling to say exactly what does happen between us (much like trying to describe an orgasm). Carol obeys because I want her to obey because I am more dominant than her. She never consented to being mine. I took her the moment her life and mine came together (yes, from our very first meeting... not even a date). I had no more choice in that than she did. It happened because I was incapable of doing anything different and she was incapable of responding any other way. On one hand, it is an absolute level of control that is unfettered by the need for justification or agreement. On the other hand, it is an incredibly nuanced dialog between us that has very little to do with "command" and "obedience". Even the word "authority" isn't really right. What is right is "dominance". Now, having said all that, wasn't that a mouth full of self-referential gobble-de-gook? I think it was. Yet for all that, after a good year of chewing on exactly that question... "what is dominance [to me]?" that is the best I've got. Do I personally think that this viewpoint is any more true, real, good or any other adjective than some other meaning for the word "dominance". No, not particularly. Well actually, I could argue that it was "less true" on a BDSM site than a lot of other views seeing as it isn't drawn from BDSM. Do I think that other people have more spins on this than I can imagine? Yes. Hence, my original statement... it's hard as hell to discuss these things. More and more I'm coming to the conclusion that we are all talking words to each other and very little meaning gets conveyed .... at least on a topic like this. To make an analogy, this question is a lot like asking, "Why did you become a slave?" You'd get a ton of answers. But the problem is each and every respondent would be meaning something different by the word "slave" and so it's really hard to put those answers into any sort of context. I'd venture to guess that the reasons most people became a [sex] slave are vastly different than the reasons most people became a [service] slave. Probably, each set of reasons looks stupid to the other... or at least so alien as to be unrecognizable. Even worse, it probably wouldn't be hard to get 50 different views of what a [sex] slave is and what a [service] slave is *laughs*.
_____________________________
~Jeff I didn't so much "enslave" Carol as I did "enlove" her. - Me I want a joyous, loving, respectful relationship where the male is in charge and deserves to be. - DavanKael
|