steve2011 -> RE: Bdsm is wrong (1/10/2011 5:01:35 PM)
|
I've not made any assumptions, i've merely replied with opinion, if it isn't valued why are people still replying to my thread? If you don't wish to change good luck to you, i've said that all along, I don't beleive it's healthy, I beleive it's a false self, me saying that may anger certain people on here but it's certainly not abusive. quote:
ORIGINAL: angelikaJ quote:
ORIGINAL: steve2011 I thought you'd be able to relate tio the bar scenario. WOuld it be easier if I said I approached a gang of youths injecting heroin and told them it was wrong? I know for sure i'd get an abusive/hostile reaction there in the same way that I have here. quote:
ORIGINAL: angelikaJ Ah, so A) I am nitpicking and B) you are making assumptions without actually getting out and meeting anyone to see if your theory holds any water. You might find a whole bunch of happy well adjusted folks. Again, I was addressing your blanket statement that BDSM was wrong and the examples you gave. The bar example was just the most recent. I could easily do the same with each one. That is the problem with generalisations. And no, it really isn't being nitpicky if you were to go back and read the rest of the post and see the context of the whole and not just scan without comprehension. My point wasn't really about the bar and if you couldn't see that then that is exactly why the rest of your data analysis is wrong. I am not being hostile. I am just trying to convey flaws in your logic and analysis. You have an opinion that BDSM is Wrong. You have an opinion that it has roots in abuse and perpetuates abuse in adults. Now, granted, people would still disagree with you had you said that, but I would not be arguing against your logic. I would accept your opinion as a valid opinion for you. If you were to try to apply it as being try for everyone then I would be reminding you that it is an opinion and not fact. I find spanking to be hot. I know that the roots of it are not because I was spanked as a child. I know that it may be because I came across scholarly books my dad left behind that made mention of Victorian discipline. They were analytical in nature. I was perhaps 10. I have no desire to "be cured". (My analytical nature now, however has more to do with my reading all of Sherlock Holmes when I was 12-13.) There is ZERO abuse in my relationship with the man who is my Master. Not physical, nor emotional. There is consentual impact play that brings me to very yummy places. Neurotransmitters are involved, as is turning down my left brain chatter. My relationship is more than just that though. You are making assumptions about people that (according to you) have little or no first hand knowledge of. The moment you made a blanket statement and then tried to justify it without looking into the opposing viewpoint your case as it were lost ground. So, what might happen if you were wrong?
|
|
|
|