joether
Posts: 5195
Joined: 7/24/2005 Status: offline
|
The information in the article doesn't talk about Climate Change. As the data (for climate change) takes in to account, normal, observable changes. Anyone with a decent understanding of Climate Change would understand this rather quickly. Conservatives however, can not seem to understand Climate Change to begin with a reasonable discussion. Unless your going to convience me that before 1820, there were 8.6 billion people? Using modern day technology on a daily basis? And to use that technology, would mean having the facilities to power it all? That really is your arguement, and sadly, displays how little you actually understand of the current information, let alone 'Climate Change'. Droughts on a regional level in those times, effected people. Less resources, meant more likelyhood of devistation and war. Many enviroment events were thought of as 'of the Gods'! or, 'God's Wrath'. Earthquakes, volcano explosion, or massive flooding, would create 'times of instability'. I believe that is what the authors are pointing out, rather then, stating this clearly disproves Climate Change. Conservatives seem to latch on to any bit of information, regardless of how flimsy it is, that justifies their morals and judgements. In many ways, Climate Change it is much like the Theory of Evolution debate. Funny that its conservatives whom are against science, and liberals that are for it. Then again, it makes sense, as to perform science, one must be able to be open rather then narrow minded. But, if you think the information presented in this study disproves Climate Change; by all means, present it.
|