Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: consideration?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: consideration? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 6:55:04 PM   
CeriseNin


Posts: 286
Joined: 4/8/2010
Status: offline
CalifChick for the win.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 81
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 6:56:02 PM   
FukinTroll


Posts: 6277
Joined: 2/6/2007
From: Under a bridge
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

status:  successful first date, first base
status:  three dates, third base, and if we don't fuck on the next one I'm moving on
status:  fourth date, we've had sex
status:  dating, but haven't met his parents yet
status:  dating, but only every other weekend, as he has his kids the other weekends and we're not ready to introduce me to his kids
status:  not sure if I want a future with this guy, kinda iffy on how he treats waitstaff
status:  friends with benefits until one of us finds someone we want to be monogamous for
status:  can't decide if we should divorce or not
status:  fucking my boss, biding my time until we break up and I sue for sexual harrassment and hostile work environment

Cali




Oh FFS! I thought you said you were keeping the particulars of our relationship off of this site. I want the fukin Porsche back and the house in France... and my girlfriend you hussy!


_____________________________

I'm the guy your girl is thinking about when she is fucking you!

TrollTopia
Greedy Groupie!

The Mods have me on speed Spank!! Gotta luv'em.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 82
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 7:03:13 PM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline
edited to say... you're right darling, I'm sorry.





< Message edited by CalifChick -- 1/19/2011 7:05:52 PM >


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to FukinTroll)
Profile   Post #: 83
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 7:04:50 PM   
FukinTroll


Posts: 6277
Joined: 2/6/2007
From: Under a bridge
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

Loki, the one-armed midget wrestlers were the part of our relationship that I agreed to ke........

Oh.

Yeah.


call me
 




Edit! Edit! Edit for fuk sake!!!!!

P.S. yer fukin lawyer keeps intercepting the calls.


_____________________________

I'm the guy your girl is thinking about when she is fucking you!

TrollTopia
Greedy Groupie!

The Mods have me on speed Spank!! Gotta luv'em.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 84
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 7:12:45 PM   
FukinTroll


Posts: 6277
Joined: 2/6/2007
From: Under a bridge
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

edited to say... you're right darling, I'm sorry.



DAMN IT!


_____________________________

I'm the guy your girl is thinking about when she is fucking you!

TrollTopia
Greedy Groupie!

The Mods have me on speed Spank!! Gotta luv'em.

(in reply to CalifChick)
Profile   Post #: 85
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 7:23:23 PM   
CeriseNin


Posts: 286
Joined: 4/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautyDebased

*smiles*

I generally choose to ignore those who find fault or feel the need to throw insult at others, as someone happy with their life I don't have that need but I guess, each to his/her own.

I am also pretty sure a Dom knows he is being monitored by the sub during a time of consideration, for my Master and I we saw it as an engagement, just not a vanilla one as it were, before I was collared to him and in my eyes became the luckiest slave girl on earth.


Beauty.

Oh for God sake, hahaha.

As someone with a happy life, I don't feel the need to be a coward; But hey, to each their own.

< Message edited by CeriseNin -- 1/19/2011 7:27:40 PM >

(in reply to BeautyDebased)
Profile   Post #: 86
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 10:39:17 PM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FukinTroll

::SNIP:: uniformed flying monkeys ::: SNIP:::



HEY now!!!

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to FukinTroll)
Profile   Post #: 87
RE: consideration? - 1/19/2011 11:51:26 PM   
BeautyDebased


Posts: 96
Joined: 3/20/2009
From: My Masters Feet
Status: offline
Wow.....It's just something I do :(,

I am sorry if you read it that way, none of my posts have been condescending, just stating that being under consideration can work or I kinda thought that's what I was doing.

I hope that gives others hope too, if you misunderstand me I do apologize but it was never intended.

I never realized some people on the forums were so aggressive, maybe trying to help isn't a good idea.

Some of the smilies are creepy too, I use an emote instead...and have on many forums, most never thought anything of it, myself included...kind of shocked at the replies really, I'd have thought it someone didn't like how I responded or if maybe I was doing something that may appear mean they would have the courtesy of IM'ing me.

Saying someone looks like a idiot or stupid because of a few words on their profile isn't nice either, I don't care what people have on their profiles, everyone's entitled to do it their way, whatever works for them.





Beauty.

< Message edited by BeautyDebased -- 1/19/2011 11:56:25 PM >


_____________________________

-Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you-

MAT 7:6.

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 88
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 12:01:03 AM   
BeautyDebased


Posts: 96
Joined: 3/20/2009
From: My Masters Feet
Status: offline
quote:

status: successful first date, first base
status: three dates, third base, and if we don't fuck on the next one I'm moving on
status: fourth date, we've had sex
status: dating, but haven't met his parents yet
status: dating, but only every other weekend, as he has his kids the other weekends and we're not ready to introduce me to his kids
status: not sure if I want a future with this guy, kinda iffy on how he treats waitstaff
status: friends with benefits until one of us finds someone we want to be monogamous for
status: can't decide if we should divorce or not
status: fucking my boss, biding my time until we break up and I sue for sexual harrassment and hostile work environment



Of course not,

To do so would be silly, however, to announce what we saw as our engagement seemed like a nice thing to do, we assumed it would allow others hope, that you can meet someone here and have it work.

Because that's what it was to us, something of an engagement period before I was collared to him.



Beauty.


_____________________________

-Give not that which is holy unto the dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you-

MAT 7:6.

(in reply to Aynne88)
Profile   Post #: 89
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 3:40:07 AM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: LadyPact

Without the quoting, I think there may be a communication issue.  To Me, when someone says they don't "get" something, it means that they don't understand, not that they don't practice it.  That they can't wrap their minds around how other people might think or live differently. 

Unfortunately, this seems to be another area where opinion seems to be trumping experience and knowing people who have chosen a different way. 



Just for you, here is the OP and my initial response to it. Please note that the OP refers to what she's seen in profiles and NOT that which she has seen in r/l relationships. She further asks for our thoughts on *consideration online*.

quote:

quote:

ORIGINAL: TNDommeK

I have often seen on profiles "under consideration by <insert name here>" Im just curious but what are your thoughts on consideration online?


Focus:
"Under consideration" is about separating a naive newbie sub from the greater informed and knowledgeable community so as she'll never know that the "dom/me" likely has less clues about domination than she does.

It's about him maintaining exclusive access. Sure, it's a control dynamic - just as kidnapping and imprisoning someone is. IE, it really only benefits one of the two parties concerned....

We poke fun at the fakes and wannabes all day but they do have a gift for getting to and isolating the new meat, first. My personal favourite is when the sub "under consideration" puts in her profile that all contact with her must first go through "Sir/Lord/Master Emptyhead" for his approval.

As if any self respecting Dom/me is gonna skip through those hoops....



Topics digress.... And one of the most common ways to sidetrack a discussion is when someone comes along and makes it all about them - regards it as a personal attack against their life choices in order (apparently) to take offense. Cues LadyNTrainer.

At some point (and I played my role), this went from the online wankers manipulating newbies - and please don't tell me this is news to you - to a r/l anti-poly meltdown. Hell, looks like I've even pissed off the cane toad from up in the soggy north (IB).

Ignoring the condescending overtone, you're right, I have no r/l experience of a poly relationship. That's choice (the horse*) - not ignorance or lack of opportunity etc. The few I've known of r/l (from a distance) seemed to change the regular cast more often than the old "Boston Legal" series. Which only reinforces my poly prejudices (the cart*)....

And still that's not the topic or the gist of my original reply.



quote:

The new trend seems to be that as long as a person wants to shout about how they are only going on uninformed opinion, it's all good.


Nope; it's the old trend of people going out of their way to get offended. Incapable of seeing a bigger picture than themselves.

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to LadyPact)
Profile   Post #: 90
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 9:31:53 AM   
CalifChick


Posts: 10717
Joined: 10/28/2007
From: California
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautyDebased

I hope that gives others hope too, if you misunderstand me I do apologize but it was never intended.

...kind of shocked at the replies really, I'd have thought it someone didn't like how I responded or if maybe I was doing something that may appear mean they would have the courtesy of IM'ing me.



So you're new to the internet then? It is neither a courtesy nor a discourtesy to send you a private message to call you to task on your behavior. It's just something SOME people do, so to imply that not doing so is discourteous is just more of the same unclever behavior.

See, that edit button disappears after a while, so your passive-aggressive putdowns of people who disagree with you belie your words now. Surely you can see how your words are condescending: "I generally choose to ignore those who find fault or feel the need to throw insult at others, as someone happy with their life I don't have that need but I guess, each to his/her own." Translated, this means, "I'm happy with my life, but apparently you people are unhappy with your lives and therefore find fault with others and throw insults."

Cali


_____________________________

AKA "The Undisputed Goddess of Sarcasm", "Big Bad Cali" and "Yum Bum". Advisor to the Subbie Mafia, founding member of the W.A.C. and the Judgmental Bitches Brigade, member of the Clan of the Scarlet O'Hair-a's and Team Troll

(in reply to BeautyDebased)
Profile   Post #: 91
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 9:48:06 AM   
CeriseNin


Posts: 286
Joined: 4/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautyDebased

Wow.....It's just something I do :(,

I am sorry if you read it that way, none of my posts have been condescending, just stating that being under consideration can work or I kinda thought that's what I was doing.

I hope that gives others hope too, if you misunderstand me I do apologize but it was never intended.

I never realized some people on the forums were so aggressive, maybe trying to help isn't a good idea.

Some of the smilies are creepy too, I use an emote instead...and have on many forums, most never thought anything of it, myself included...kind of shocked at the replies really, I'd have thought it someone didn't like how I responded or if maybe I was doing something that may appear mean they would have the courtesy of IM'ing me.

Saying someone looks like a idiot or stupid because of a few words on their profile isn't nice either, I don't care what people have on their profiles, everyone's entitled to do it their way, whatever works for them.





Beauty.

You know what else isn't nice? Wrapping your bullshit insults in smiles and fake niceties. Either have the guts to say it straight out, or don't even bother.

(in reply to BeautyDebased)
Profile   Post #: 92
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 9:49:57 AM   
GreedyTop


Posts: 52100
Joined: 5/2/2007
From: Savannah, GA
Status: offline
as always *adores Cali*

quickly adding Cerise to the HELL YEAH list..

_____________________________

polysnortatious
Supreme Goddess of Snark
CHARTER MEMBER: Lance's Fag Hags!
Waiting for my madman in a Blue Box.

(in reply to CeriseNin)
Profile   Post #: 93
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 12:42:13 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: CeriseNin


quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautyDebased

Wow.....It's just something I do :(,

I am sorry if you read it that way, none of my posts have been condescending, just stating that being under consideration can work or I kinda thought that's what I was doing.

I hope that gives others hope too, if you misunderstand me I do apologize but it was never intended.

I never realized some people on the forums were so aggressive, maybe trying to help isn't a good idea.

Some of the smilies are creepy too, I use an emote instead...and have on many forums, most never thought anything of it, myself included...kind of shocked at the replies really, I'd have thought it someone didn't like how I responded or if maybe I was doing something that may appear mean they would have the courtesy of IM'ing me.

Saying someone looks like a idiot or stupid because of a few words on their profile isn't nice either, I don't care what people have on their profiles, everyone's entitled to do it their way, whatever works for them.

Beauty.

You know what else isn't nice? Wrapping your bullshit insults in smiles and fake niceties. Either have the guts to say it straight out, or don't even bother.


Since you've quoted it, I've gotta assume you read the same post I just did.... So the gist of your reply here is that a new poster needs to demonstrate the same crude, aggressive and cliquey style as you just have, or not at all?

BeautyDebased, no-one likes a "smiling assassin" - it makes you appear sociopathic (and creepy). If you're gonna confront a stranger(?) as you did initially with sirsholly, then put yourself in a r/l situation and ask yourself if you'd be smiling at the time. Me. I don't mind a smiling assassin in r/l, because one has fair and reasonable opportunity to reply with a "Liverpool kiss".... Such is how it provokes.

Overall, I'd say thicken your skin a tad, that people will jump at a chance to get offended, esp when they have a point. I thought your "smile" was a nervous afterthought to take the edge off your words rather than overt condescension. But it made you an easy target for a (small) "feeding frenzy" - and the above post is how cowardly mob-rule tends to degenerate.

Focus.


_____________________________

Never underestimate the persuasive power of stupid people in large groups. <unknown>

Your food is for eating, not torturing. <my mum> (Errm, when I was a kid)

(in reply to CeriseNin)
Profile   Post #: 94
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 12:54:26 PM   
CeriseNin


Posts: 286
Joined: 4/8/2010
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Focus50


quote:

ORIGINAL: CeriseNin


quote:

ORIGINAL: BeautyDebased

Wow.....It's just something I do :(,

I am sorry if you read it that way, none of my posts have been condescending, just stating that being under consideration can work or I kinda thought that's what I was doing.

I hope that gives others hope too, if you misunderstand me I do apologize but it was never intended.

I never realized some people on the forums were so aggressive, maybe trying to help isn't a good idea.

Some of the smilies are creepy too, I use an emote instead...and have on many forums, most never thought anything of it, myself included...kind of shocked at the replies really, I'd have thought it someone didn't like how I responded or if maybe I was doing something that may appear mean they would have the courtesy of IM'ing me.

Saying someone looks like a idiot or stupid because of a few words on their profile isn't nice either, I don't care what people have on their profiles, everyone's entitled to do it their way, whatever works for them.

Beauty.

You know what else isn't nice? Wrapping your bullshit insults in smiles and fake niceties. Either have the guts to say it straight out, or don't even bother.


Since you've quoted it, I've gotta assume you read the same post I just did.... So the gist of your reply here is that a new poster needs to demonstrate the same crude, aggressive and cliquey style as you just have, or not at all?

BeautyDebased, no-one likes a "smiling assassin" - it makes you appear sociopathic (and creepy). If you're gonna confront a stranger(?) as you did initially with sirsholly, then put yourself in a r/l situation and ask yourself if you'd be smiling at the time. Me. I don't mind a smiling assassin in r/l, because one has fair and reasonable opportunity to reply with a "Liverpool kiss".... Such is how it provokes.

Overall, I'd say thicken your skin a tad, that people will jump at a chance to get offended, esp when they have a point. I thought your "smile" was a nervous afterthought to take the edge off your words rather than overt condescension. But it made you an easy target for a (small) "feeding frenzy" - and the above post is how cowardly mob-rule tends to degenerate.

Focus.


No, but your strawman is amusing. If someone is insulting me, fine, not everyone is going to like me; but don't pretend you're* not one of the assholes while taking cowardly swipes at people.


*general use

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 95
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 1:42:07 PM   
salemartist


Posts: 195
Joined: 12/17/2010
From: Salem
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: kalikshama

/demands cookies first/




I see your cookie skills are coming along nicely...
I may have to put you under consideration after all

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 96
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 1:43:22 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
Thanks to LillyBoBeep for showing me this website, which may have contributed to the perversion of "under consideration": http://www.submissivewomensecrets.com/

Run a free ad on one of the free submissive women sites I'll reveal and submissive women will in effect apply for your consideration! Many of their emails will start off with "Dear Sir please consider me". Then they will wait hopefully for your decision! That's right - they will apply to you for your consideration!

All you have to do is run a free online ad and wait for their "Please consider me" introductory emails and pics, then sit back and choose the submissive sluts you find most attractive and instruct them on how and when you'll meet. (Many will ask how you want them to dress and what kind of makeup to wear in order to please you.) Then after you meet you can train them to sexually satisfy you in any way you choose.


(in reply to TNDommeK)
Profile   Post #: 97
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 1:46:52 PM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

I see your cookie skills are coming along nicely... I may have to put you under consideration after all


No, those were the cookies I was demanding from lilredsubmarine, who wants to have my babies. She hasn't come through yet, so you shouldn't consider her.

(in reply to salemartist)
Profile   Post #: 98
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 2:01:52 PM   
sexyred1


Posts: 8998
Joined: 8/9/2007
Status: offline
Cracking up at this thread, love Cali and CeriseNin's comments.

Also love the "smiling assassin" comment. I find it incredible that people are so afraid to speak up and be themselves on a message board.

But of course, if you do that, some people see you as a upfront bitch and some people could not stand that moniker. I am another one who despises the 'smiles" thingie. Ugh.

Oh and for the record? I don't care for the consideration thing either. Why announce that? It is like blogging publically about your relationship status or putting it on Facebook. Who cares really? Only you and the person involved should.

I, of course, tell it like it is, always, upfront bitch be damned.

< Message edited by sexyred1 -- 1/20/2011 2:03:49 PM >

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 99
RE: consideration? - 1/20/2011 2:11:48 PM   
salemartist


Posts: 195
Joined: 12/17/2010
From: Salem
Status: offline
at this point im considering making my own damn cookies

(in reply to sexyred1)
Profile   Post #: 100
Page:   <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: consideration? Page: <<   < prev  3 4 [5] 6 7   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094