Prinsexx -> RE: no limits period (1/20/2011 2:25:34 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: asubsydneymale quote:
I have been asked to take part in a play session that will have a period where there will be no limits, no permanent marks or injuries will occur, nothing illegal, no scat. During the no limits period, I will be bound, blindfolded and have been informed that excessive screaming will result in my mouth being taped, I want to and don't want to - what do you think ? I think that the concept of limit is a function of relationship. By that I mean that in some relationships I have consented to no limits and in some I have negotiated a safe signal. My final word here is that I would not know what I was consenting to no matter how defined the activities if I did not know whom I was playing with. This may also be partially die to the fact that I don't do 'play' activities that are distinct from relationship. The closest I have come to that is when I have been 'loaned' as a submissive but then what I would term 'full rights' to limitations have been put in place. As a woman in the dominant position I am wary at the moment of submissive males who insist on no limits. It is not that I do not trust myself and my abilities to take responsibility but it feels rather odd to me at this time that submission is deemed better or greater because it is of a no limits nature. Is it a public play session? Is it someone you already know? Is it someone who is using this limited period of no limits as a test? If so as a test of whom? You? Or themnselves? Taking away the rights to limits under unknown conditions seems rather foolish, in my opinion and I would need to have those questions above answered before I could advise further or even have empathy with the situation.
|
|
|
|