Aylee
Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007 Status: offline
|
Reply to Aqua, As I understood the new rules it is a "no visible" policy. But as to why those things are a bad idea. If a LEO arrests someone and has a visible tat, piercing, or gold teeth things, and the law breaker ends up going up the river for 20 years, it is far easier for the bad guy to identify that officer to his buddies for retaliation. (wow, that was a run on sentence.) Making a this policy a "none at all" policy keeps the department from lawsuits about appropriate and inappropriate tattoo, et cetera, decisions. If a prospective employee has a "FTW" tattooed across his neck and is denied employment, he cannot sue the department because Officer Snuffy has a yin-yang on his neck. All types of employment have their "personal expression" restrictions. Usually it falls under, "dress code." Why should LEOs be different?
_____________________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.
|