Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: False flag nuclear attack?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: False flag nuclear attack? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:28:29 AM   
DarkSteven


Posts: 28072
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
I have no clue about the veracity of anything else, but the SB is NOT in two weeks time.  It's this weekend.

_____________________________

"You women....

The small-breasted ones want larger breasts. The large-breasted ones want smaller ones. The straight-haired ones curl their hair, and the curly-haired ones straighten theirs...

Quit fretting. We men love you."

(in reply to Moritarion)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:37:53 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Rule,   YES.

There will be nukes.

I do not think tho- that the collapse is bad enough for that yet.    False flags are a fact of history.  Happens more often then anyone realizes.   Lets say Tazz files a police report- the police figure a victim is also a perp.  Why is that?  Maybe because in police science-  people them selfs cause false flags- and factor in the govt is for the people-- same logic applies.

Oh- and another thing- you confuse this as a board which has adult participants....  try not to frighten the children. !

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:38:17 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Moritarion
Thanks for the Google comment. ... I used Google and could not locate your source - hence my polite request for the source.

That is odd. I found it on my second try just now at the top of the page. Do you know what TPB is short for? (I gotta be circumspect as some subjects are frowned upon here.) Google it in combination with "false flag" and 'nuclear'.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Moritarion
London is the world's biggest and most powerful financial center - it cannot be viably backed up in any fashion which makes it such a tempting terrorist target.

I suppose that London is a bit more of a bite than the twin towers, so that may be an impediment. On the other hand a dirty bomb affects only a few city blocks and most people there use the subway anyway, so yes: it might be a target.

(in reply to Moritarion)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:40:20 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Think Pad Buttons (they are programmable).

Equally as sensible as this  asswipe.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:41:29 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DarkSteven
I have no clue about the veracity of anything else, but the SB is NOT in two weeks time.  It's this weekend.

Ah, perhaps I ought to look out of the window then.

(in reply to DarkSteven)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:42:39 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
Do you have a toilet paper fixation, Ron?

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:44:39 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Nope, but one does not need to microscopically inspect horseshit to know its horseshit, one can simply scan across or akimbo.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:45:03 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Dont listen to him.  He is on medications.


So why Seattle?

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 6:50:56 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
Dont listen to him.  He is on medications.

Ah.

quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy
So why Seattle?

The USA did a preventive study some years ago on a nuclear attack on Seattle. The conclusion of the study was that more people escaped from the city by way of the bridges than expected. I got the impression that they were disappointed and were wondering what to do about it. Edited to add: If I recall correctly, that study is very hard to google. I do not recall whether I ever found it again.

Such exploring studies are often performed in preparation of an attack. The same happened for example as regards the vulnerabilities of the twin towers.

< Message edited by Rule -- 2/2/2011 6:52:01 AM >

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:21:17 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
http://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/1446/seattle_vulnerable_to_nuclear_terrorism.html

Seattle moved into the center of the cross hairs when the mastermind of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, put the Northwest's tallest building on his top 10 target list. Later, U.S. forces found photos of the Space Needle in an al-Qaida hideout in Afghanistan./snip

space needle?  I wonder if that is an Illuminati symbol.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:25:21 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
~FR

Keep feeding his delusions, everyone.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:43:04 AM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Door to door vacumn sales men throw dirt on your rug,  WHY?


False flag.

(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:44:40 AM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
The recent invention of an invisibility cloak offers terrorists and suicide bombers in particular a defence against exposure and capture that has left law enforcement circles 'reeling' with shock and anger.

"How are we supposed to pick them out in a crowd now?" demanded Sgt A N Tibombar of the crack Seattle anti-terrorist squad. "This is fiendish. Pure Evil. There's no defence against an invisible nuclear bomb. Seattle doesn't stand a chance now."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-claim-to-have-created-invisibility-cloak-2201667.html


Edited with an invisible hand using invisible ink

< Message edited by tweakabelle -- 2/2/2011 7:51:39 AM >


_____________________________



(in reply to tazzygirl)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:47:46 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline
You still believe in the tooth fairy too!

Look up the definition of a flase flag. It in no way fits what you are trying to make it fit with a salesman.

_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:53:54 AM   
kalikshama


Posts: 14805
Joined: 8/8/2010
Status: offline
quote:

That a false flag nuclear attack was being planned, I suspected years ago. I was a bit surprised, though, to see a book torrent in two parts about such an attack on TPB. The author says that the book is unfinished and that he felt forced to prematurely put it on TPB because the attack is imminent, mentioning a quaint event called the Super-bowl which is to occur in two weeks time.


Black Sunday

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:03:47 AM   
Rule


Posts: 10479
Joined: 12/5/2005
Status: offline
Thank you. I recall a movie somewhat like that.

According to Wikipedia Obama is a democrat. Generally, democratic presidents fatten up the economy in preparation for war and subsequently republican presidents implement the war, is my impression. Thus I deem it unlikely that there will be a false flag nuclear attack on USA soil during the reign of a democratic president.

(in reply to kalikshama)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:06:35 AM   
tazzygirl


Posts: 37833
Joined: 10/12/2007
Status: offline


The "Super genious" repudiates his own OP.

~damn that Palin!

< Message edited by tazzygirl -- 2/2/2011 8:07:44 AM >


_____________________________

Telling me to take Midol wont help your butthurt.
RIP, my demon-child 5-16-11
Duchess of Dissent 1
Dont judge me because I sin differently than you.
If you want it sugar coated, dont ask me what i think! It would violate TOS.

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:16:34 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SaintIntensity

"hey honey, there's been a nuclear attack in Europe"
"hell, woman, be quiet - we need this field goal to tie"

yeah because those 3 points override the "end of the fucking world" importance of such an event

just as mad as the other loons on here - gold/legal bullshit/foreskins - sounds like alchemy to ME

3 Stooges movie has been greenlit - we've had it online for YEARS here!

sad, mad, and pathetic losers ahoyyyyy


the idea that anyone who claimed the government would not pull a false flag op is the ravings of a mad lunatic has now gone full circle to prove that those who put head under pillow get fuckem up ass!

Even wiki puts it out there!



Operation  Northwoods memorandum (March 13, 1962).[1]

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a series of false-flag operation proposals that originated within the United States government in 1962.

The proposals called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington." Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
"The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere."
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted and the proposals included in the plan were never executed. James Bamford summarizes Northwoods as follows:
Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.[2]


now you were saying what again?

Oh thats only one of several pages btw

I feel safe and warm and cozy now knowing that my government is protecting me!






< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/2/2011 8:19:39 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SaintIntensity)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:23:48 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: tweakabelle

The recent invention of an invisibility cloak offers terrorists and suicide bombers in particular a defence against exposure and capture that has left law enforcement circles 'reeling' with shock and anger.

"How are we supposed to pick them out in a crowd now?" demanded Sgt A N Tibombar of the crack Seattle anti-terrorist squad. "This is fiendish. Pure Evil. There's no defence against an invisible nuclear bomb. Seattle doesn't stand a chance now."

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/scientists-claim-to-have-created-invisibility-cloak-2201667.html


Edited with an invisible hand using invisible ink


invisibility? LOL

who needs to be invisible when a li6 nuke is the size of a fucking softball?

Oh yeh and the sweet part about it is if a government drags their feet even a little bit there is little to no radioactive footprint left after about a week to 2 weeks LOL

I am glad that the government has control over them and protects me from evil.





< Message edited by Real0ne -- 2/2/2011 8:28:15 AM >


_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to tweakabelle)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:26:23 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Except that you have absolutely no credible proof of these assertions (lol, like that is something new).

Are you saying this again? 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: False flag nuclear attack? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4 5   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094