Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: False flag nuclear attack?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: False flag nuclear attack? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 7:28:58 PM   
outhere69


Posts: 1302
Joined: 1/25/2011
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
quote:

ORIGINAL: jlf1961
quote:

ORIGINAL: Hillwilliam
By the way, fusion, cold or hot, does NOT produce Tritium. It produces Helium. Different (non dangerous) element.

Dont confuse him with scientific facts and the laws of physics. The fact that fusion is done using deuterium and tritium to make Helium is a fundamental fact that is lost on the op.

fusion is the combining of nuclei.  when you combine 2 deuterium nuclei you have fusion and produce tritium and 4HE

see you learn something new every day.

I talked about this 4 years ago, ask lucky LOL

IN fact I was all ready to order me up a 50 gallon drum of heavy water!  At least until I found out they charged 400 bucks an oz.  LMAO

Jesus.  You were supposed to be powering your house on a fusion reactor several years ago.

D+D is the only one yielding tritium; all the other practical fusion reactions yield Helium3 or Helium4.

You also need to see excess neutrons of the right energy distribution.

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 101
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 8:59:15 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline


well I started the project and it appeared to work as expected.   My purpose was using it for a super efficient heater and pull off as much residual electricity as possible for a bonus.  I got the expected sharp knee reduction in current and it heated a gallon of water much faster than my stove with considerably less power which was expected but the electrode didnt last very long and needed continual adjusting.   Frankly I have not even thought about it since then.....  Use as a heater requires long term stability and no one wants to be adjusting it constantly.   Now I came up with fix but that would have required a complete redesign that would have been a rather large undertaking (and expense) and while I was mulling it over I got distracted and built another device that was something that is frankly marketable and produces about 130% eff in heating but I had industry in mind but mainly wanted it for the home but it had to be downsized to the point the point the 30% savings went up in smoke.  So that shot that in the ass, at least for home use.  Anyway I completed the foundational work so its ready go in as much as concept to design so I may still produce them at some point....   But I so fucking hate marketing a new product and even with patents others  have workarounds and china gets it and your done.  So I shelved it and just continue to use my burn any damn thing furnace. LOL

thats how that story on that episode stands.  It was fun though I have always enjoyed designing shit.  Right now I am as everyone can tell heavy into law and playing in the courts and I find it difficult to jump from one from on frame of mind to another in a snap of a finger to any real depth and maintain my present focus.  I want to get down to the bottom of getting all our rights back (if we ever really had them) not only for me but so that the courts respect peoples rights without them having to wade through the syntax and procedural minefield fight for what these trustees swore an oath to protect in the first place!  the problem is that most people not only do not know what their rights are but have no clue how to traverse that mine field the bar has set for them.   I might pick it up the fusion toys again at some point if my interest swings that way.  (I have to many LOL) 

Meantime I still heat for free except for the cost of running the blower which is peanuts so its no rush.  




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to outhere69)
Profile   Post #: 102
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 9:13:45 PM   
pahunkboy


Posts: 33061
Joined: 2/26/2006
From: Central Pennsylvania
Status: offline
Why does a false flag have to be nuclear?   I could throw 200 marbles in the mall and create confusion. 

(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 103
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/2/2011 10:17:48 PM   
tweakabelle


Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007
From: Sydney Australia
Status: offline
200 marbles won't get you on TV will they?

_____________________________



(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 104
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/3/2011 3:40:52 AM   
Politesub53


Posts: 14862
Joined: 5/7/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: pahunkboy

Why does a false flag have to be nuclear?   I could throw 200 marbles in the mall and create confusion. 


Some would say you have already lost your marbles.

(in reply to pahunkboy)
Profile   Post #: 105
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/3/2011 7:03:57 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Real0ne
well I started the project and it appeared to work as expected.   My purpose was using it for a super efficient heater and pull off as much residual electricity as possible for a bonus.  I got the expected sharp knee reduction in current and it heated a gallon of water much faster than my stove with considerably less power which was expected but the electrode didnt last very long and needed continual adjusting.   Frankly I have not even thought about it since then.....  Use as a heater requires long term stability and no one wants to be adjusting it constantly.   Now I came up with fix but that would have required a complete redesign that would have been a rather large undertaking (and expense) and while I was mulling it over I got distracted and built another device that was something that is frankly marketable and produces about 130% eff in heating but I had industry in mind but mainly wanted it for the home but it had to be downsized to the point the point the 30% savings went up in smoke.  So that shot that in the ass, at least for home use.  Anyway I completed the foundational work so its ready go in as much as concept to design so I may still produce them at some point....   But I so fucking hate marketing a new product and even with patents others  have workarounds and china gets it and your done.  So I shelved it and just continue to use my burn any damn thing furnace. LOL

thats how that story on that episode stands.  It was fun though I have always enjoyed designing shit.  Right now I am as everyone can tell heavy into law and playing in the courts and I find it difficult to jump from one from on frame of mind to another in a snap of a finger to any real depth and maintain my present focus.  I want to get down to the bottom of getting all our rights back (if we ever really had them) not only for me but so that the courts respect peoples rights without them having to wade through the syntax and procedural minefield fight for what these trustees swore an oath to protect in the first place!  the problem is that most people not only do not know what their rights are but have no clue how to traverse that mine field the bar has set for them.   I might pick it up the fusion toys again at some point if my interest swings that way.  (I have to many LOL) 

Meantime I still heat for free except for the cost of running the blower which is peanuts so its no rush.  


So, you can obviously provide design schematics for what you got for not only peer review, but it would (should you actually produce them and they work) certainly make alot more people get interested and even support your law work.

Failing that, we are all considering this another one of your delusions of granduer delusions.  

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 106
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/4/2011 8:13:57 PM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
Sure ron!

Her you go, give us your peer review;





_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 107
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/5/2011 6:34:53 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
Yes, exactly.............shortfingers is hallucinating more asswipe, as per usual. 

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 108
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/5/2011 7:16:27 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
some peer review, you first have to get it! LOL

_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 109
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/5/2011 7:17:59 AM   
mnottertail


Posts: 60698
Joined: 11/3/2004
Status: offline
I got it, you are blowing smoke from your ass, as always.

_____________________________

Have they not divided the prey; to every man a damsel or two? Judges 5:30


(in reply to Real0ne)
Profile   Post #: 110
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/5/2011 7:27:08 AM   
SaintIntensity


Posts: 177
Joined: 5/25/2007
Status: offline
if I start laughing at this BS I'd never stop
and the wireless power transmission? you know, the other part of the combo that would make you the richest man on the planet - but you can't be bothered to produce/market (errr if it worked, someone would do all that for you for, say, 10% of the cake, I can guarantee that! )

jesus you could run a city from the fumes off the crap that gets spouted by some on here, thats for sure!

(in reply to mnottertail)
Profile   Post #: 111
RE: False flag nuclear attack? - 2/5/2011 7:38:12 AM   
Real0ne


Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SaintIntensity

if I start laughing at this BS I'd never stop
and the wireless power transmission?
you know, the other part of the combo that would make you the richest man on the planet - but you can't be bothered to produce/market (errr if it worked, someone would do all that for you for, say, 10% of the cake, I can guarantee that! )

jesus you could run a city from the fumes off the crap that gets spouted by some on here, thats for sure!


who let you our of your cage anyway?

do you know how to use a computer? 

How many times do I have to tell the idiots out here to look up konstintan meyl who has PROVEN it to work how many fucking times now at glascou and 2 other universities.

I see you still enjoy getting fucked ragged LOL




_____________________________

"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile

Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment?

Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality!

"No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session

(in reply to SaintIntensity)
Profile   Post #: 112
Page:   <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> Dungeon of Political and Religious Discussion >> RE: False flag nuclear attack? Page: <<   < prev  2 3 4 5 [6]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078