popeye1250
Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006 From: New Hampshire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hlen5 quote:
ORIGINAL: NorthernGent ........No problem, Hlen...take your point...you think you're caught between the devil and the deep blue sea. Exactly! I suppose my response is this: either you're (United States foreign policy) is exclusively altruistic in all of this, or there's something in it for you (the United States). I err on the side of cynic, and think it's all about you (the US). Just curious as to why you'd help a country thousands of miles away that most people couldn't find on a map. The reason for helping any country with civil unrest is to put our money where our mouth is. We speak of ourselves as egalitarian and democratic and now people are throwing off the yokes of dictators left and right (directions people, not political descriptions!!). I'm not advocating that we must do something, but I'm just answering your question. Actually I've thought of another reason - If we can pay off Mubarak for thirty years to have stability in the region, why can't we go to the right side and pay for social justice for the people of the Middle East? hlen, because they're not our people and not our responsibility? I believe Sen. Christopher Dodd said about 15 years ago that "foreign aid is the most detested govt. program to the American People." I really don't think that's changed since then. Personally I want to end all "foreign aid" and I'm not even as militant about it like many people are. Read some of the opinions in the Yahoo News articles about it that pop up from time to time like whenever they mention Haiti! All Oblunder has to say is, "sorry but the U.S. is not the world's police force or rescue service." The bottom line is that all that money belongs to the Taxpayers, not to "the govt."
_____________________________
"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"
|