gungadin09 -> RE: TV's - No offense but please stop showing up as Female Dominants (2/26/2011 4:36:54 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: YourToDeny Women unlike men have much less a need to advertise their single-ness i think you're referring to the fact that men outnumber women on this site, and especially, male submissives outnumber female Dominants. What this means is that if we have non-women posting themselves as women, we get a disproportionate amount of men in the search - I have hidden at least a hundred men from the search (every time I see a wrongly classified page I hide it) and they are still overwhelming the submissive male's search for a dominant female. This hampers the effectiveness of the website. As far as i am concerned, you're welcome to discard anyone from your search, for any reason. i don't think the term *bigotry* applies to romance or sex. What gets you hot gets you hot, and what doesn't, doesn't. i don't think the same concepts of "fairness" apply here as would apply if you were hiring someone for a job, for example. If you aren't interested in transvestites or transgender individuals, or *anyone*, you are free to pass them by. Having said that... i find it REAL hard to believe that biologically female Dominants are literally being "drowned out" by all the lying TV and TG Dominants out to deceive poor, unsuspecting male submissives. The reason you're having difficulty finding Someone is because, as you said yourself, submissive males far outnumber Dominant females. That's not anybody's fault, it's just a fact. Technically, the number of TVs or TGs identifying as women does not affect the number of submissive men on the site, but rather the number of Dominant women. What that means is that you may have to screen potential cantidates to make sure that they are biologically female, if what you are searching for is a biological female. i can understand your frustration if they're downright *lying* about it. But this is the internet, and people sometimes lie. That problem is experienced by everyone, not just you. Incidently, it's a free website, and you get what you pay for. Moral grounds: it seems wrong for a TV to post as a dominant female and assume a position of power under false pretenses to try to manipulate submissive males who are looking for what they truly want. Seriously: how many TV or TG dominants have approached you, (or you approached them) and *flat out* claimed that they were biologically female, only to have you find later that it wasn't true? What are these "false pretenses" you're talking about? Come closer... i have a secret to tell you. It may shock you to hear it. You pass by people every day whose biological gender is not obvious at a glance. Gasp. Yes, it's true. And yet, as a society we don't require people to wear labels for easy indentification. In real life, you have to ask. i'll grant you this: it would be easier for you if all TVs and TGs identified themselves as such. If i were TV or TG i would explicitly state it in my profile, to avoid any misunderstandings or resentment. Surely you aren't the only person on this site for whom *biological gender* makes a difference. However, please try to see things from the opposite point of view. If you feel put upon as a male submissive trying to find a match, think of how much more disadvantaged TVs and TGs must feel. And i can understand not wanting to walk around the site (so to speak) while "wearing" that label. After all, in real life, it's probably *not* immediately obvious. It might be unfair to expect it to be here. Again I make this protest with the utmost respect for those involved in this practice, and I mean no offense... In that case, perhaps it would be better not to refer to people as non-women, pseudo women, or to make statements like females have less of a need to advertise their singleness (singleness?), or males have a desperation to be selected and females don't. pam
|
|
|
|