Real0ne
Posts: 21189
Joined: 10/25/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Real0ne quote:
ORIGINAL: jack8007 quote:
legal or lawful eh? do you even know the difference? Please educate us. I've only been practicing 25 years, I want to hear this. Kool! I enjoy teaching attorneys the law :) Legal or Lawful? It is crucial to define the difference between legal and lawful. The generic Constitution references genuine law. The present civil authorities and their courts use the word legal. Is there a difference in the meanings? The following is quoted from A Dictionary of Law 1893: Lawful. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. “Lawful” properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; “Legal”, a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a “legal” process however defective. See legal. Legal. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual “Legal” looks more to the letter [form/appearance], (presumptions) and “Lawful” to the spirit [substance/content], (substantive merits) of the law. “Legal” is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; “Lawful” for accord with ethical principle. “Legal” imports rather that the forms [appearances] (in other words bullshit fictions) of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; “Lawful” that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. “Legal” is the antithesis of equitable, and the equivalent of constructive. 2 Abbott’s Law Dic. 24. be nice now :) oh what area do you practice btw? Ok People now we get to see how attorneys play ball.... this is gonna be fun! quote:
ORIGINAL: jack8007 quote:
Legal or Lawful? So what's the difference?!?! I have to agree, you are leagues from clear. Now I would expect anyone who is not in the law profession to say that but for you to say that immediately throws up big red flags. You have 2 adjectives that are largely interchangeable, even if by grammatical convention lawyers may often refer to an act as "lawful" or not - I've never heard ANYBODY try to make the distinctions you're trying to make, nor even give a shit. Why would they give a shit? There is no money in it. Bullshit make turn on me's and the corrupt courts lots of money. In fact, when I translate my prose from legalese for my clients, I translate "lawful" as "legal", because real people don't say "lawful". Ok here, this should be perfectly clear to you. Quantum syntax translation just for you no charge, understandable read in either direction and dierctly translatable into 5000 dialects. quote:
LAW: For the law is with the substance and morals. LEGAL: For the legal is with the false construction and void morals. Dont tell me I already know... you dont get it LOL. Black's isn't free online, and I sure don't give enough of a shit to break mine open & copy it. Bottom of the barrel toilet paper dictionary by comparison. I have every damn one of them and when I am lazy I qoute from them, but they are bottom of the barrel dictoinaries. The dictionaries you cited are - well, let's say unknown - Black's is the only generally recognized legal dictionary. ah huh! LOL Like I said a POS, the supreme court uses bouviers btw LOL But most importantly, you haven't tried to explain what difference it makes to your original point. yes I did, why are you pretending. Maybe you arent a real attorney.... Lots of people say they are a lot of things. An attorney would have had no problem understanding the distinctions so whats your malfunction? I will grant, you won't see job openings for "lawful secretaries", but how does that make a difference to your point? It looks to me like we are left with your distinction without a difference, in which case I refer you to CA Civil Code sec. 3533, "The law disregards trifles." See also, "sea lawyer". Yeh modern legal roman law disregards lots of shit. 50 words all mean the same thing. turn on me's to dumb to make distinctions. See misfeasance and trespass on the case. Oh shit that last one is common law! quick get your cross!! And don't be listening to any of them common law boys about strawmen, etc, or you'll wind up sharing a cell with Wesley Snipes. Come on dont come on here and tell everyone you are a fucking attorney and you dont even know the difference between civil, common and commercial law. damn. speaking of common law..... quote:
WISCONSIN CONSTITUTION: ARTICLE XIV. Common law continued in force. SECTION 13. Such parts of the common law as are now in force in the territory of Wisconsin, not inconsistent with this constitution, shall be and continue part of the law of this state until altered or suspended by the legislature. failure to respond with peculiar specificity to the merits in fact is tacit acquiescence that you agree with everything I have said. there is a legal construction just for you turn on me!
< Message edited by Real0ne -- 3/2/2011 10:12:50 PM >
_____________________________
"We the Borg" of the us imperialists....resistance is futile Democracy; The 'People' voted on 'which' amendment? Yesterdays tinfoil is today's reality! "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session
|