joether -> RE: Why can 't we do this in the US? (3/6/2011 3:59:21 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub There is nothing special... that is my point... to be a naturalized citizen you must show a rudimentary grasp of English so this law would not affect citizenship in any way. Last I checked, one does not need to show a rudimentary degree of American-English to become a US Citizen. In fact, one does not even need to learn American-English to live, work, and play in the USA. HOWEVER, learning the language of the land, would open doors previously barred from the individual. More job options, travel to different parts of the country, and even taking part in goverment (they pay taxes, why not be proactive in goverment?). Creating any sort of law, even an Amendment that demands that the offical language of the USA is English (or as we generally know it as, American-English), would be thrown out of court. 1st Amendment would trump the law in a heart beat. "Freedom of Speech", is generally a concept surprisingly not widely understood. I didn't write the laws, but that is how its understood. If you look to the true motive of the person(s) demanding that American-English be made the offical language, generally hold rather racist viewpoints towards groups of people that do not, as part of their culture and region (i.e. chinatown in Boston, MA), speak American-English. Its disguised on the idea, that it would reduce the cost to hire people to translate material from one to the other or vise versa. Again, 1st Amendment would trump any law that requires a US Citizen, a legal/illegal alien, diplomate, or any other person, found under the US Goverment, to speak only in American-English. If the SCOTUS voted 8-1 regarding the Westboro Baptists Church to protest at soldier's funerals....take a wild guess how they would vote on something as plainly obvious as limiting the 1st Amendment. quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub English is just the majority language now… if it were Spanish I would say the same… it is not which language that is important just that there is a common language to allow all citizens to communicate. Venture to certain parts of the USA, and you'll find that American-English is not the majority language spoken. It would be like stating the only people that live in the USA, are direct decendants of Europe. quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub I also believe all school children in all school districts no matter their ethnic configuration should be taught in English as the primary language and I think the national language should guarantee this. I agree, but not for the reason(s) you discribe, but what I did, above. Their parents will teach them their native language without a doubt; but the schools will teach them English. In the end, the student is bi-lingual, which is a benefit to us as a whole in the nation. quote:
ORIGINAL: kdsub A common language is not discrimination it is the opposite… It is an attempt to bring all people of different ethnic backgrounds together by communication. Kind of like communism for languages? A common language has been shown not to reduce playground bullies anymore then not knowing it. But what if someone simply refuses to learn English? You going to threaten/force them to learn the language with stiff penalties? That is a case that will lose in court. You want a common language that EVERY person on this planet understands? Try music....
|
|
|
|