Aylee
Posts: 24103
Joined: 10/14/2007 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle Aylee, can you nominate a single area of human endeavour that is not characterised by diversity? Some test where humans failed to perform across a range of results? Where everyone is the same? Or everyone performs to the same standard? If one exists, I've never heard of it. Or any area of everyday life where humans all perform to the same standard? Cooking? Running? Thinking? Talking? Writing? Working? Posting to CM? Tastes? Fashions? Likes and dislikes? Any area, discipline, or skill? Test humans in any area and you will get a range of results. People perform across a range of diversity. All humans are diverse. We're the same and we're different at the same time. We are diverse. That diversity is all around you and me and everyone else every second of every day. That diversity is the impetus for change and renewal. Without change and renewal things become stagnant and die. The tendency to diversify through random mutation is the driving force of evolution - without it, we wouldn't be here. Humans as we know them wouldn't have evolved. The world as we experience it would have died off long ago without this tendency to diversify. Tweakabelle, Let's say that I am going to build a house. For this I will need a diverse workforce. An architect, plumber, electrician, roofer, the sheet-rock dude, the window dude, you get the idea. If instead, you bring me a diverse workforce consisting of a black dude, white dude, gay dude, a woman, a catholic, a Mormon, you get the idea, and they are ALL plumbers, I will never get my house built. The first is functional diversity. It is very useful. I do not bother celebrating it though. The second consists of non-functional or status diversity. It is not useful. I see no reason to celebrate it. SexyBossyBBW (henceforth to be referred to as SBBBW) just posted a list of a bunch of people. Given her objections to my opinion on the usefulness of non-functional diversity I can only take from that she believes that color, religion, sexuality, ethnicity, language, et cetera is what makes a person worthwhile. She lists Barack Obama. So what is important to her about Obama is that he is black / half-black, whatever. NOT that he was elected President of the United States. I do not feel that color, religion, sex, et cetera are important. I do think that focusing on these kinds of differences creates problems. It is just surface crap that has nothing to do with your abilities or worth as a person. SBBBW seems to think that the surface stuff is the sum of a person. So, when I build my house I want and would values a functionally diverse work crew. Their non-functionally diverse aspects make no difference to me.
< Message edited by Aylee -- 3/27/2011 9:33:45 AM >
_____________________________
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam I don’t always wgah’nagl fhtagn. But when I do, I ph’nglui mglw’nafh R’lyeh.
|