tweakabelle
Posts: 7522
Joined: 10/16/2007 From: Sydney Australia Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
ORIGINAL: Aylee quote:
ORIGINAL: tweakabelle quote:
The second consists of non-functional or status diversity. It is not useful. I see no reason to celebrate it. Aylee, the example you gave to illustrate what you call "non-functional or status diversity" is not "non-functional or status diversity" - it is just plain stupidity. When I hear of someone attempting to build a house using just plumbers, I will give your claim serious consideration. Do you have a serious example of what you mean by this? By serious I mean something that is not a strawman-type example, not contrived and likely to occur in the real world. Between now and then ('cause I fear I might be waiting a while for your example) could you offer an example of any area of human behaviour where human performance is not characterised by diversity as requested? If you are unable to offer such an example, do you then agree that a fundamental characteristic of human behaviour is its diversity? Again, there are TWO types of diversity here. Useful and non-useful. If I am going to build a house I am only interested in one type. Can you do the job I need you to do? So, I need a plumber, an electrician, yadda, yadda. I am not interested in hiring someone based on race, language, age, sex, culture and hetero/homosexuality. Celebrating an achievement is one thing. YAY! You made it through boot camp! Celebrating your genes is ridiculous. YAY! My genes give me a skinnier body than you! So have fun judging and placing value you on people because of their skin color or religion or sexual partner. Don't ask me to join in. Unable or unwilling to provide a single serious example of your cherished "non-useful" diversity Aylee. Unable or unwilling to abandon your strawman example. Unable or unwilling to nominate a single instance of human behaviour/endeavour that isn't characterised by diversity. Unable or unwilling to resolve the contradictions pointed out in your position. Unable or unwilling to answer whether diversity is a fundamental feature of human behaviour of not. Instead a series of comical attempts at a comical defence of a comical (mis)understanding/caricature of diversity. This position screams denial to me. The diversity of life, of humans, of human behaviour, of Nature is all around us every second of every day. We can choose to recognise it, or choose to deny it. Like kids caught with their hands in the cookie jar who deny stealing the cookies, those who choose denial are only fooling themselves. Ultimately they are the only losers. It is obvious that I am unable to communicate with you. I do not think that making a personal judgment on someone based on race, language, age, sex, culture and hetero/homosexuality is useful. You believe that it is. I hope you enjoy your time deciding just who is a worthwhile person based on the color of their skin, their first language, how old they are, if they are an innie or an outie, where they grew up and who they want to fuck. I think that is rather hate-filled and ugly, but it is your life and your decision. Good luck with that. You don't find it difficult to communicate with me. You refuse to. You refuse to answer any question put to you. You attribute totally fictitious views to me, views I despise and reject totally and have done so consistently for as long as you have known me. Views I specifically rejected as recently as a few hours ago. Views I find offensive to the core. If you haven't the intellectual or moral honesty to deal with questions you don't like that is your problem. To maliciously attribute hate to me to cover your own cowardice tells me much more than I need to know about you. I had long suspected your views were rooted in fear ignorance and insecurity. You have just demonstrated my suspicions were correct. I feel so so sorry for you.
_____________________________
|