Hillwilliam
Posts: 19394
Joined: 8/27/2008 Status: offline
|
Here is my prob with the cameras (3 actually) 1. No due process. The owner of the car pays a fine whether he was driving or not (at least here). I don't have a prob paying for my mistakes but not those of others. If someone else is driving my car, why should I pay their tickets? That's liberal thinking. "someone made a mistake. It might have been you or maybe it wasn't but you pay. They say you can get them dismissed. That is BS. we had a guy who proved, by showing the police report, that his car was stolen before it ran a light. the sheriff even got involved. He finally paid up after a collection agency hurt his credit. It just wasn't worth $100. this guy was a victim twice. Once when his car was stolen and then when he was extorted. 2. The cameras don't treat everyone the same. If you just bought your car and have a temp tag, you get away scot free. Same for folks who drive with stolen tags (more than you would realize) or who have tags obscured by mud or snow. 3. They take the mark 1 mod 0 eyeball out of the equation. I dare you to be able to read your newspaper and not find a story about a routine traffic stop that turns into an arrest for DUI, wanted felon, drugs, stolen property or etc. In the OP, how many of those drivers do you think were drunk off their ass? I'd bet a very high percentage. The ones who weren't involved in collisions went home, slept it off and when they got the ticket in the mail I bet they said "Holy SHIT I'm glad that wasn't a cop" The more cameras there are, the fewer police are involved in traffic stops and the more drunk drivers will drink again to maybe kill next time.
_____________________________
Kinkier than a cheap garden hose. Whoever said "Religion is the opiate of the masses" never heard Right Wing talk radio. Don't blame me, I voted for Gary Johnson.
|